Next-Generation Microelectronics for CubeSats and Small Satellites: The Future of Low-Cost Space Missions

Welcome to SysEng, AI, Microelec, MBSE Insights. I'll provide insights and inspiration on Systems Engineering, Microelectronics, and AI, aimed at fueling innovation and nurturing professional growth in the dynamic tech landscape.

? Click subscribe to be notified of future editions

Today, we'll explore the latest advancements in microelectronics, power management, thermal control, radiation-hardening, and propulsion systems that are transforming CubeSats into powerful tools for space exploration. It highlights how these innovations are enabling CubeSats to perform complex missions, extend their operational lifespan, and venture beyond low Earth orbit into deep space.

CubeSats and small satellites have transformed space exploration, offering affordable, compact solutions that allow universities, research institutions, and companies to conduct missions that were once the domain of large, costly satellites. These miniaturized satellites, known as CubeSats, follow a standardized design typically measuring 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm, with a mass of around 1.33 kg per unit, referred to as "1U." CubeSats can be built in configurations like 1U, 3U, or 6U, depending on mission requirements, and their low cost, modular design, and versatility make them ideal for a wide range of space missions. Originally developed for educational purposes, CubeSats have evolved into a robust platform for scientific research, Earth observation, telecommunications, and even deep space exploration.

However, despite their many advantages, CubeSats face limitations due to their small size and limited power capacity. To overcome these challenges, recent advancements in microelectronics, power management, thermal control, radiation-hardened systems, and propulsion technologies are enabling CubeSats to perform more complex and demanding missions, even in deep space. This article explores these key developments, highlighting how they are shaping the future of CubeSat missions.

Advancements in Microelectronics for High Performance and Low Power

CubeSats are fundamentally constrained by their small size and limited power availability. Recent innovations in microelectronics are helping CubeSats achieve higher performance without compromising on power efficiency, a critical factor for long-duration missions.

One key development is the introduction of low-power phased-array receivers, such as a 256-element Ka-band CMOS receiver, which supports data rates up to 24 Gb/s with minimal power consumption. This technology enables CubeSats to maintain efficient communication with Earth while operating with limited energy resources (Fu et al., 2023). Similarly, advances in electric power system (EPS) architectures, including modular and distributed EPS designs, enhance CubeSat reliability by improving fault tolerance and optimizing power distribution (Edpuganti et al., 2021).

These innovations not only improve performance but also open the door to more sophisticated CubeSat missions, enabling them to handle complex tasks like real-time data processing and inter-satellite communications. The ability to maintain high performance while operating on low power is a game-changer for CubeSats, allowing them to take on roles previously reserved for larger satellites.

Power Management: Extending Mission Lifespan and Capabilities

Power management is critical for the success of CubeSats, especially for missions that involve long periods of operation in space. Recent advancements in solar panels and energy storage technologies are significantly extending the operational capabilities and lifespans of CubeSats.

High-efficiency solar panels with Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) capabilities ensure that CubeSats can maximize energy capture, even in varying light conditions. Gallium nitride transistors reduce the size of power converters, allowing more efficient placement of solar panels on CubeSats (Yaqoob et al., 2022). Improved battery management systems and redundant converters further enhance energy storage, ensuring that CubeSats can continue to operate during periods without sunlight.

These advancements in power systems provide CubeSats with greater autonomy and resilience, enabling them to sustain operations over extended mission durations. As CubeSats are deployed in increasingly complex and remote environments, the ability to manage power efficiently will be essential to their success.

Thermal Management for Extreme Environments

Managing temperature fluctuations in space is crucial for CubeSat operations. Without proper thermal control, sensitive electronics can either overheat or freeze, leading to mission failure. Both passive and active thermal management solutions are being developed to handle these challenges.

Deployable radiators, which use triangular fin arrays actuated by bimetallic coils, are an effective passive solution, reducing CubeSat body temperatures by up to 45°C. Meanwhile, phase change materials (PCMs), such as open-cell copper foam combined with vanadium oxide-based materials, provide reliable heat absorption and release during temperature transitions (Elshaer et al., 2023). These materials maintain the temperature balance within CubeSats, ensuring that components operate within safe limits.

Although active systems like heaters offer more precise control, passive solutions are generally favored for CubeSats due to their limited power and space constraints. These thermal management innovations will become even more critical as CubeSats undertake missions in environments where extreme temperature fluctuations are the norm.

Radiation-Hardened Electronics for Deep Space Exploration

CubeSats destined for deep space must withstand high levels of radiation, which can degrade or damage electronics. New radiation-hardened technologies are making CubeSats more resilient to these harsh conditions, extending their operational life in radiation-heavy environments.

Nanoscale air channel devices (NACDs), for example, have shown exceptional radiation resistance, with no degradation observed after exposure to high levels of radiation. This makes them well-suited for deep space missions (Fan et al., 2023). Dynamic biasing techniques, which adjust device bias during periods of intense radiation, further enhance the durability of electronic components by significantly extending their lifespans (Schrape et al., 2021).

With these innovations, CubeSats can now venture into regions of space that were previously too dangerous due to high radiation levels. This resilience will be essential as CubeSats take on more ambitious missions beyond Earth's protective magnetosphere.

Propulsion Systems: Expanding CubeSat Reach Beyond LEO

One of the most exciting advancements for CubeSats is the development of miniaturized propulsion systems, which allow these small satellites to travel beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) and perform deep space exploration. These propulsion technologies, including electrospray and ion thrusters, offer high efficiency while fitting within the small form factor of CubeSats.

Electrospray propulsion systems, which use ionic liquids as propellant, are ideal for CubeSats because they provide highly efficient thrust with minimal space requirements (Cisquella-Serra et al., 2022). Ion thrusters, such as the Advanced Cusp Field Thruster (ACFT), offer low power-to-thrust ratios and high total impulse, making them a viable option for long-duration interplanetary missions (Bl?ttermann et al., 2024).

These propulsion systems enable CubeSats to perform orbital maneuvers, station-keeping, and even interplanetary transfers, significantly expanding their operational range. With the capability to explore beyond LEO, CubeSats are now poised to take on more ambitious roles in space exploration, including missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

Conclusion: A Bright Future for CubeSat Missions

The future of CubeSats is incredibly promising, thanks to the rapid advancements in microelectronics, power management, thermal control, radiation-hardened systems, and propulsion technologies. These innovations are transforming CubeSats from simple educational platforms into sophisticated tools capable of performing complex scientific, commercial, and exploratory missions. As these technologies continue to evolve, CubeSats will become an essential part of the space exploration ecosystem, offering low-cost, high-impact solutions for missions across the solar system and beyond.

References:

1.????? Xi, Fu., Dong-Gyun, You., Xiaolin, Wang., Yun, Wang., Carolyn, Jill, Mayeda., Yuan, Gao., Michihiro, Ide., Yuncheng, Zhang., Jun, Sakamaki., Ashibir, Aviat, Fadila., Zheng, Li., Jumpei, Sudo., Makoto, Higaki., Soichiro, Inoue., Takashi, Eishima., Takashi, Tomura., Jian, Pang., Hiroyuki, Sakai., Kenichi, Okada., Atsushi, Shirane. (2023). 1. A Low-Power 256-Element Ka-Band CMOS Phased-Array Receiver With On-Chip Distributed Radiation Sensors for Small Satellite Constellations. IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits,? doi: 10.1109/jssc.2023.3312535

2.????? B. Hussein, A. M. Massoud and T. Khattab, "Centralized, Distributed, and Module-Integrated Electric Power System Schemes in CubeSats: Performance Assessment," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 55396-55407, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176902.

3.????? B. Hussein, A. M. Massoud and T. Khattab, "Centralized, Distributed, and Module-Integrated Electric Power System Schemes in CubeSats: Performance Assessment," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 55396-55407, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3176902.

4.????? A. Edpuganti, V. Khadkikar, M. S. E. Moursi and H. Zeineldin, "A Novel Multiport Converter Interface for Solar Panels of CubeSat," in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 629-643, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3098584.

5.????? Yen-Sheng, Chen., Yu-Hong, Wu., Chia-Chi, Chung. (2019). 5. Solar-Powered Active Integrated Antennas Backed by a Transparent Reflectarray for CubeSat Applications. IEEE Access,? doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012133

6.????? A. Edpuganti, V. Khadkikar, H. Zeineldin, M. S. E. Moursi and M. A. Hosani, "Enhancing Lifetime of 1U/2U CubeSat Electric Power System With Distributed Architecture and Power-Down Mode," in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 901-913, Jan.-Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2021.3128373.

7.????? Mohammad, Yaqoob., Abderezak, Lashab., Juan, C., Vasquez., Josep, M., Guerrero., Marcos, E., Orchard., Angelina, D., Bintoudi. (2022). 3. A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,? doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3175093

8.????? Bayan, Ahmad, Hussein., Ahmed, Massoud., Tamer, Khattab. (2022). 5. Optimized Load-Scheduling Algorithm for CubeSat's Electric Power System Management Considering Communication Link. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems,? doi: 10.1109/taes.2023.3290547

9.????? Josh, Cannon., Rydge, B., Mulford., Brian, Iverson. (2023). 1. Triangular fin array passively actuated by bimetallic coils for CubeSat thermal control. Applied Thermal Engineering,? doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122239

10. Abdelrahman, M., Elshaer., A.M.A., Soliman., M., Kassab., A.A., Hawwash. (2023). 2. Experimental and numerical investigations of an open-cell copper foam (OCCF)/phase change material (PCM) composite-based module for satellite avionics thermal management in a thermal vacuum chamber (TVC). Journal of energy storage,? doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109572

11. Masaki, Yamagata., Yurina, Wakita., Yoshihiro, Tsuruda., Kikuko, Miyata. (2022). 4. Feasibility study of low-temperature operable electric power supply for CubeSats using passive thermal control with VO2-based solid–solid phase change material. Thermal science and engineering progress,? doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101601

12. A., ElHefnawy., A., Elmaihy., Ahmed, Elweteedy. (2022). 5. Passive thermal control design and analysis of a university-class satellite. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,? doi: 10.1007/s10973-022-11542-x

13. Linjie, Fan., Biyao, Zhao., Baihong, Chen., Yue, Ma., Jinshun, Bi., Fazhan, Zhao. (2023). 1. Radiation Immune-Planar Two-Terminal Nanoscale Air Channel Devices toward Space Applications. ACS Applied Nano Materials,? doi: 10.1021/acsanm.3c04292

14. Oliver, Schrape., Marko, Andjelkovic., Anselm, Breitenreiter., Steffen, Zeidler., Alexey, Balashov., Milos, Krstic. (2021). 2. Design and Evaluation of Radiation-Hardened Standard Cell Flip-Flops. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I-regular Papers,? doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3109080

15. M. Holliday, T. A. Heuser, Z. Manchester and D. G. Senesky, "Dynamic Biasing for Improved On-Orbit Total-Dose Lifetimes of Commercial Electronic Devices," in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 3326-3336, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3148974.

16. O., Anagnostou., Valentino, Liberali., M., Mews., Seyed, Ruhollah, Shojaii. (2019). 4. An innovative radiation hardened CAM architecture. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment,? doi: 10.1016/J.NIMA.2018.11.054

17. Albert, Cisquella-Serra., Marc, Galobardes-Esteban., Manuel, Gamero-Casta?o. (2022). 1. Scalable Microfabrication of Multi-Emitter Arrays in Silicon for a Compact Microfluidic Electrospray Propulsion System. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,? doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c12716

18. David, Villegas-Prados., Javier, Cruz., Mick, Wijnen., Pablo, Fajardo., Jaume, Navarro-Cavallé. (2024). 5. Emission and performance characterization of ionic liquids for an externally wetted electrospray thruster. Acta Astronautica,? doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.03.013

19. Hans, Bl?ttermann., Nils, Gerrit, Kottke., Max, Vaupel., Martin, Tajmar., Franz, Georg, Hey. (2024). 4. Endurance testing and characterization of a novel candidate for CubeSat propulsion: The Advanced Cusp Field Thruster (ACFT). Acta Astronautica,? doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.03.074

20. Paulo, C., Lozano., Brian, L., Wardle., Padraig, Moloney., Suraj, Rawal. (2015). 2. Nanoengineered thrusters for the next giant leap in space exploration. Mrs Bulletin,? doi: 10.1557/MRS.2015.226

21. Eric, Hand. (2018). 3. Interplanetary small satellites come of age. Science,? doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.361.6404.736