Next-Generation Accountability: A Menu of Options
Brian K. Creasman, Ed.D.
Superintendent of Fleming Co. Schools | 2020 Kentucky Superintendent of Year | AASA National Superintendent Certification | Published Author (6x) | Husband to Valerie and Father to Georgia (I'm her biggest fan!)
In the context of Next Generation Accountability Models, a "Menu of Options" refers to a set of various indicators or measures that are utilized to gauge local accountability in education systems. These indicators are designed to provide a comprehensive view of school or district performance beyond traditional standardized test scores.
The term "Menu of Options" suggests a customizable approach, where education stakeholders can select from a range of indicators that best reflect the unique characteristics and goals of their local education system. These indicators may encompass various aspects of educational quality, student achievement, equity, school climate, student engagement, teacher effectiveness, and community involvement.
By offering a diverse set of indicators, a Menu of Options allows for a more holistic assessment of educational outcomes and supports a broader understanding of school performance. This approach aims to encourage innovation, flexibility, and responsiveness to the specific needs and priorities of individual schools or districts, ultimately fostering a more nuanced and meaningful community-based accountability framework.
In terms of the work happening in Kentucky, what does a "Menu of Options" look like?
The "Menu of Options" in Next-Generation Accountability Models empowers local control and customization. This buffet of diverse indicators, going beyond standardized tests, allows stakeholders to tailor accountability to their specific community needs. School boards, administrators, faculty/staff, parents/guardians, and most importantly, students themselves, all have a voice in selecting indicators through the "Menu" metaphor.
The "Menu of Options" aligns perfectly with the core principle of Next-Generation Accountability: raising expectations in a way that's relevant to each community. This means no single indicator defines a domain's quality. Instead, a combination (triangulation) of indicators paints a more complete picture. For example, a "Student Achievement" domain might include test scores, but also student self-assessment of learning and growth.
领英推荐
Student voice is CRITICAL. Including student-centered metrics allows districts to measure what truly matters to learners, strengthening accountability with students, not just to them. The traditional method, relying solely on standardized tests, devalues student voice and reduces accountability to a single data point. The Menu of Options fosters a sense of ownership and investment in learning among students, moving beyond this narrow approach.
The diverse indicators encompass various aspects of educational quality. Just like Kentucky's 171 school districts, the chosen indicators can vary greatly. What's important to one district might not be the same for another. However, many districts may choose similar indicators while still making the determination at the community level based on local priorities.
Next-generation models often include common Accountability Domains as core assessment categories. These provide a foundation for comparison across districts. While some districts may choose a more traditional approach, the Menu of Options allows them to select additional indicators within domains like student achievement, school climate, and teacher effectiveness.
The Menu of Options fosters a more holistic assessment by offering a diverse array of indicators. This approach moves schools away from a narrow focus on test scores and supports a broader understanding of a school's performance. It encourages innovation and flexibility, allowing schools and districts to prioritize indicators that directly address their specific needs. Ultimately, the Menu of Options aims to create a nuanced and meaningful accountability framework that fosters continuous improvement tailored to each local context.
Some states may require a common set of indicators for all districts. This ensures consistency but allows districts to showcase additional indicators for a more complete picture of student readiness. This aligns with the need for common ground that most legislatures, including Kentucky's, likely seek in accountability models.
The “Menu of Options” presents an exciting opportunity for continuous improvement and innovation in education. It challenges each district to think beyond traditional metrics and to consider a broader, more holistic view of student success and school performance. It invites us to redefine accountability in a way that is meaningful, relevant, and responsive to our unique local contexts.
Nat'l Keynote Speaker & Author. I believe in developing values-driven leaders & inspiring teams to peak performance. Guatemalan farmboy raised without electricity—college grad, worked for Apple, Tesla, Salesforce, & Uber
11 个月Sounds like an exciting step forward! ?? Brian K. Creasman, Ed.D.