Newton's cosmology today? (Booklet)

Newton's cosmology today? (Booklet)

v. 4 n. 27

cosmology (on-line dictionary):

  1. the branch of philosophy dealing with the origin and general structure of the universe, with its parts, elements, and laws, and especially with such of its characteristics as space, time, causality, and freedom.
  2. the branch of astronomy that deals with the general structure and evolution of the universe.

NOTICE title and cover image changes.


The articles list is much longer than usual because of the scope of the subject, as indicated in the definition of "cosmology" above.

Conventionally, the small scale is described by quantum theory and the large scale by relativity. But Newton today might say that,

F = Gmn/r^2 plus special relativity .................. (small scale)

F = G(-w)(-z)/r^2 ..................................................... (large scale)

where the negative signs in the latter do not refer to visible matter. At the large sale the "attraction" would be between overlapped essentially spherical cosmic voids of dark energy or accelerated expanding space (each surrounded by a relatively thin shell of galactic superclusters some 200 million light year thick) to eventually form a single larger spherical void, overall structure of visible matter shells directly proportional to size of the Universe. When gravity is identical with accelerated expanding space, the cosmological constant of general relativity is implicit.

Since the vectors of the expanding dark energy (proposed gravitational) fields are from the void centers to the peripheries of galactic superclusters, when the voids overlap slightly there is an indication of low visible matter density between the voids; then the fields of each void oppose and cancel in the overlap region, and the remaining fields continue to expand as the general accelerated Hubble expansion, as in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Overlapped cosmic voids forming a single larger spherical void with galactic supercluster shell.

Note that the mechanism of "attraction" is physically repulsive.

At the small scale the attraction appears to be between visible matter within solar systems. But the mechanism is the same as for the large scale, which, in this case, is the relative absence of accelerated expanding space between sufficiently close particles. When the equation is combined with special relativity, quanta are expressed. *

Locality is indicated in the large and small scale, where there was no known expressed mechanism for attraction of visible matter with the classical view of Newton's gravity at the small scale.

Articles in order of first presentation, with the exception of that starred (*) --

* (1) Gravitational basis of quanta? | LinkedIn

(1) An explanation of dark matter and dark energy from unmodified Newtonian gravity* | LinkedIn

(1) Where is the boundary between the small and large scale? | LinkedIn

What is gravity? (Part 1 of 3) | LinkedIn

What is gravity? Part 2: The equivalence principle or the identity principle? | LinkedIn

What is gravity? Part 3: The equivalence principle revisited | LinkedIn

The hierarchy problem: Why is gravity such a weak force? | LinkedIn

An equivalence (but not identity) of attractive and proposed repulsive Newtonian gravity | LinkedIn

Large-scale structure and dynamics | LinkedIn

Big Bang to Big Sponge | LinkedIn

A brief derivation of electron mass | LinkedIn

Particle spin as energy converter | LinkedIn

Dark matter as field instead of particle | LinkedIn

INERTIA, and the primacy of space | LinkedIn

How might gravity relate to the other forces? | LinkedIn

Mediating particles and gravity | LinkedIn

Weak/EM forces from gravity | LinkedIn

Particle and equivalence principle | LinkedIn

Since negative mass is theoretically possible, where might it be? | LinkedIn

(2) Why is there too much structure in the Universe? | LinkedIn

(2) Why does the predicted mass of the quantum vacuum have little effect on the expansion of the universe?* | LinkedIn

(2) The hierarchy problem with implicit fine tuning of gravity | LinkedIn

(2) What is the mass of the Universe? | LinkedIn

(2) The odd couple, H and G, for an explanation of the equivalence principle and centrality of inertia | LinkedIn

(2) Importance of a value for acceleration of the Universe | LinkedIn

(2) Is there a predictive explanation for radioactivity? | LinkedIn

(3) A rationale for beta decay from Newtonian gravity and special relativity | LinkedIn

(3) What are the happenings that shape the gravitational constant? | LinkedIn

(3) KEEPING IN TOUCH: A rationale for Mach's Principle | LinkedIn

(3) Why is the Universe accelerating? | LinkedIn

A boundary condition for a Big Bang singularity | LinkedIn

Gravity as dependent exclusively on acceleration? (Preliminary) | LinkedIn

Gravity as dependent exclusively on acceleration? | LinkedIn

(1) What is the nature of physical energy? | LinkedIn

(1) Natural constants from one source | LinkedIn

(1) Cosmic inflation or gravity? | LinkedIn

(1) How far does space extend? | LinkedIn

(1) Does space ever stop expanding, or trying to, regardless of scale? | LinkedIn

(1) An explanation for the equivalence principle | LinkedIn

(1) What is the shape of the Universe? | LinkedIn

(1) Is the cosmological constant constant? | LinkedIn

(2) What is the cause of "dark flow" in astronomy and astrophysics? (Suggested experiment) | LinkedIn

(2) A rationale for large scale dynamics and structure | LinkedIn

(2) Suggested simulation experiment for large-scale structure, with reference to the cosmological principle | LinkedIn

(1) Why is time in quantum mechanics Newtonian (but maybe not in the strictest sense)? | LinkedIn

(1) If light has no mass, why is it affected by gravity (discounting the equivalence principle)? * | LinkedIn

(2) How would the standard model be affected by a "photon with mass"? | LinkedIn

(2) Light from gravity? | LinkedIn

(2) An explanation for possible charm quarks in the proton by solutions to the 3-body problem | LinkedIn

(2) Affirming a physical mechanism for the production of possible intrinsic charm in the proton | LinkedIn

(2) Gluon or gravity? | LinkedIn

(2) Avoiding renormalization in quantizing gravity | LinkedIn

(2) The strong force in terms of Newtonian gravity and special relativity | LinkedIn

(2) Is proton spin related to the strong force? | LinkedIn

(2) The "crisis in cosmology" revisited | LinkedIn


Cover image: BingAI image creator

Dr. Amos A.

Astronaut at NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

1 年

Warren, Sir Isaac Newton?FRS?(25 December 1642?– 20 March 1726/27)[a]?was an English mathematician,?physicist,?astronomer,?alchemist, theologian, and author who was described in his time as a?natural philosopher. He was a key figure in the?Scientific Revolution?and the?Enlightenment?that followed. His pioneering book?Philosophi? Naturalis Principia Mathematica?(Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy), first published in 1687, consolidated many previous results and established?classical mechanics.[17][18]?Newton also made seminal contributions to?optics, and?shares credit?with German mathematician?Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz?for developing?infinitesimal calculus. Robert Charles Darwin, Charles Robert Darwin?FRS?FRGS?FLS?FZS?JP[6]?(/?dɑ?rw?n/[7]?DAR-win; 12 February 1809?– 19 April 1882) was an English?naturalist, geologist, and?biologist,[8]?widely known for his contributions to?evolutionary biology https://www.dhirubhai.net/in/dr-amos-ariny-022056220/ Website;https;//www.Facebook.com/aamor9. Email; [email protected] Website;www;twitter.com/aamor9 www.mit.academia.edu/amosariny www.nasa.gov. www.tumblr.com/aamor9 Wikipedia account, Winning science fair trophy 2011 photo, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ngora_High_School

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Warren Frisina的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了