Newsletter, Image, Likeness Vol. 113: What The Hell Is Fair Market Value?
Darren Heitner
Founder of HEITNERLEGAL — Sports, Entertainment, Trademarks, Copyrights, Business, Litigation, Arbitration
The Weekly Longer NIL Thought.
What is "Fair Market Value," also called "FMV," and why does it seem that the NIL world is becoming obsessed with the phrase?
It's because, if the House v. NCAA settlement receives final approval, then all third parties who are construed as "associated entities or individuals" (certain boosters and all NIL collectives), may only pay NIL money to athletes if the money spent is "for a value business purpose to promote goods and services provided to the general public for profit, with payments at fair market value rates, consistent with existing NCAA rules." (Emphasis added).
So, what is fair market value? I've recently had multiple discussions with NIL collectives who wish to do everything in their power to include provisions in contracts to proactively prepare for any scrutiny. But the reality is that we have no clue what "FMV" is. Even worse, the entity that has been tasked with ultimately determining fair market value doesn't know how to calculate it.
This was recently brought to light by my colleague Tom Mars , who dug into Deloitte's prior admission that a "return on invested talent," similar to "fair market value," metrics are not a "silver bullet" and do "not mean that the value proposition of people can simply be reduced to numbers."
That's reassuring (sarcasm font). The company that will be tasked with determining FMV says there's an inherent problem in trying to reduce FMV to numbers.
It makes sense that Deloitte has problems assessing FMV. The value of the players is whatever someone else will pay in exchange for their services. That's not formulaic; it's determined on a case-by-case basis and certainly not something that can be analyzed by Deloitte.
Mars also found an article published by Deloitte from December 4, 2020, where the accounting firm said, "the potential ROI for brands investing in student-athletes through NIL is speculative." If the return on investment is speculative, then isn't the FMV also inherently speculative? And if so, how would Deloitte's position, if it decides to invalidate a deal because it doesn't appreciate the actual FMV of an athlete, be defendable if challenged? It probably isn't and I expect a lot of escalation in the future if the plan to empower Deloitte comes to fruition.
In the meantime, this is creating a lot of unnecessary hypothetical gymnastics exercises in NIL collective conversations.
Lead Named Plaintiff In House V. NCAA Expresses Concerns With Pending Settlement.
"Though many believe [Grant] House to be the sole architect and benefactor of the settlement, that’s anything but the case, he says. In reality, House holds some of the same, or similar, concerns and frustrations as many of those within college athletics," wrote Ross Dellenger. "The lead attorneys in the case have not communicated with him regularly enough, he says. In a point of clarity, House says he did not agree to the much-maligned roster limitations that could cost his own sport hundreds of positions and, like so many others, he was 'shocked' earlier this month at the attorneys’ requests for more than $700 million in fees.'"
“This isn’t the end-all be-all,” House said. “It’s not the answer we should stick with for the rest of time. It’s a starting point and a leverage point to go forward and develop this over time.”
领英推荐
6 Former FSU Basketball Players Sue Head Coach For $1.5 Million In Unpaid NIL Promises.
I represent the players, so I'll link to an article covering the litigation.
Michael McCann had a great breakdown of the case, as he does with most Sports Law matters.
UConn Head Coach Jim Mora Threatens Action Against Schools Tampering With His Players.
“A simple note to the schools and coaches that have blatantly broken @NCAAFootball rules by tampering with our players in the last 24 hours. We do know who you are, we will pursue all avenues to hold you accountable,” wrote Jim Mora. "We are excited that we’ve built a program where coaches have to cheat to beat us and we will protect that program. Think hard before you tamper with our players. #justgettingstarted"
Dartmouth Basketball Unionization Effort Comes To Early End.
On New Years Eve, the union that represents Dartmouth College men's basketball players decided to withdraw its petition to the NLRB that had sought unionization. The NLRB docket already shows that the case is closed.
Seth Greenberg Produced His 'Plan To Fix College Athletics.'
Final Thoughts.
That is it for Vol. 113 of Newsletter, Image, Likeness. Thanks to the more than 9,490 people who have subscribed to this newsletter thus far, and please feel free to share this free resource with others on LinkedIn or elsewhere.
Outside of LinkedIn, you can follow me on Twitter and Instagram. And if you ever require legal assistance, check out Heitner Legal.
Event Director
1 个月The evolving NIL landscape is fascinating. How might schools adapt if the settlement reshapes their contracts and compensation strategies?
American Athlete Foundation, PostseasonNIL.com
1 个月Even if it does not get Approved it has created a pathway for the Revenue Generating Football Players and I'm the leader to get them down that path, but this opening will close in the next 3-6 months, and it will be another decade before we have this opportunity again! We have enough public admissions, source documentation, and itemized payment receipts to declare a Group Market Value for the Football Players and we need to petition to get payments directly from the payors at the same time that they pay the conferences, bowl games, schools, ncaa, and everyone else. This will not count against the schools' salary cap, so they can continue to worry about their own separate issues of all of the other nonrevenue sports, regulatory compliance, ncaa rules, conference disbursement and their other projects that they have been funding with the players' portion of the revenue. www.PostseasonNIL.com
Plaintiff's Lawyer & Sports Agent Malpractice ? Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility Issues ? College Athlete Rights Advocate
1 个月There is no current market for college athlete advertising and endorsement services, the price of the transaction between willing buyers and sellers with full information in a free market. The NCAA has been adamant for over a century that such behavior defies its rules on amateurism and is otherwise illegal, as part of its overall goal of not paying players to play. When there is no market, there is no way to estimate what the market price would be, if the antitrust constraints did not exist. If there are few professional athletes with national advertising and endorsement contracts, why anyone thinks college athletes would fare any better is a wonder. NIL is just boosters paying to play, but somehow pretending they’re not, with everyone looking sideways, because the NCAA, Conferences, and Teams, don’t want to pay, but the players want “some” money, so this is the unenforceable bright idea by the lawyers talking amongst themselves, which will allow the class lawyers to walk off the field with a half-billion dollars plus more over ten years. This is the end of college rights discussions for a decade. Dumb House.
Media | Sports | Data | Tech
1 个月Great stuff as always, Darren!! And how very on brand for a consulting agency to come a non-answer answer.