The News You Need for Nov. 18
Inclusive leadership, a Kentucky workplace tragedy, and the Son of Sam Law
Inclusive Leadership in Workers’ Compensation: Fostering Connection and Collaboration for Recovery?
Inclusive leadership is a style that emphasizes collaboration, open communication, and valuing diverse perspectives within a team. In the context of workers’ compensation, inclusive leadership encourages employers to view each injured employee as an essential, valued member of the organization, even during the challenging recovery period. This approach is particularly impactful in workers' compensation, as it ensures that the voices of injured employees are heard, respected, and included in decision-making processes that directly affect their well-being and reintegration into the workplace.?
By practicing inclusive leadership, employers create an environment where recovering employees feel supported, understood, and encouraged to participate actively in their recovery journey. Through thoughtful communication and collaboration, inclusive leaders can help injured employees maintain a solid connection to their workplace, reducing feelings of isolation and fostering a smoother, more successful transition back to their roles.?
Why Inclusive Leadership Works in Workers' Compensation?
Inclusive leadership has several unique advantages in the workers' compensation setting, where collaboration and mutual understanding are critical. This approach benefits the employer and the employee, promoting engagement, morale, and a shared sense of responsibility in recovery.?
The Challenges of Inclusive Leadership in Workers' Compensation?
While inclusive leadership offers considerable benefits, it also comes with potential challenges, especially in workers' compensation's structured and often highly regulated realm.?
How Employers Can Effectively Navigate Inclusive Leadership in Workers' Compensation?
Inclusive leadership can create a supportive environment for injured employees if approached thoughtfully. Here are some strategies for applying inclusive leadership principles while navigating the complexities of workers' compensation:?
Practical Applications of Inclusive Leadership in Workers' Compensation?
Inclusive leadership can provide powerful benefits for injured employees and the broader organization. Here are practical steps employers can take to implement this approach effectively:?
Supporting Long-Term Success through Inclusive Leadership?
Inclusive leadership significantly benefits the long-term success of employees and the organization. When employees experience a recovery process that respects and values their input, they are more likely to feel loyal, engaged, and motivated to contribute positively upon their return.?
Inclusive leadership offers a powerful approach to supporting injured employees within the workers' compensation system. It fosters a sense of belonging, empathy, and collaboration. Employers can create an environment where everyone feels valued and connected by including employees in decisions that affect their recovery.?
In our final article in this series, we will discuss how applying these leadership theories creates a comprehensive framework for claims adjusters and employers to support injured workers effectively throughout recovery. By integrating these leadership styles, we can elevate the entire workers' compensation experience for everyone involved.?
Two Dead Following Louisville Plant Explosion
Louisville, KY (WorkersCompensation.com) -- Hours after a factory exploded last week, first responders found the body of a worker they previously thought had been evacuated.
On Nov. 11, multiple workers were injured in the blast at the Givaudan Sense Colour facility. Originally, officials said no one was killed in the explosion, but later officials determined one worker died from their injuries at the hospital. Another was found in the rubble hours later.
The explosion happened around 3 p.m. and was felt as far away as Jeffersonville, Ind. Twelve people were taken to area hospitals. One was in critical condition and later died, officials said.
“We’d been told by the business that all employees were accounted for,” Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg said in a news conference. “Tragically, that was not the case.”
Brian O’Neill, chief of the Louisville Fire Department, said firefighters searched everywhere they could search in the aftermath of the explosion and found nothing. Givaudan originally told local officials that all of the employees were accounted for, but that wound up being false O’Neill said. Firefighters went back into the rubble and searched again, where they located the second victim. O’Neill said it took nearly 3 ? hours to get the victim out of the rubble.
“We are grieving with the families, friends, and loved ones of those that were lost and injured during this very difficult time,” representatives with Givaudan said.
The company said the confusion was due to “the extent of the explosion,” which forced them to evacuate workers to two different sites, a spokesperson told CNN.
“There was a miscommunication between the teams at the two locations when cross-referencing the staff list with those being transported to local hospitals. This initially led us to believe that all individuals were accounted for,” spokesperson Jeff Peppet said. “When it became clear this was not the case, we immediately coordinated with EMS at the site who re-initiated search and rescue operations.”
City officials said their thoughts were with the victims.
“I want the families of the victims to know the hearts of all Louisvillians are with them, and this city stands united with them as they face the difficult days, weeks, months, and years ahead,” Greenberg said in a post on X.
Some of the injured were transported to local hospitals. Dr. Jason Smith, with the University of Louisville Hospital Trauma Center, told the media that the trauma center had received seven patients, one of whom was the first victim. The other six patients were either stable or were treated and released. Greenberg said the employees with the most serious injuries were taken to the trauma center and those with less serious injuries were taken to other area hospitals.
Hospital officials said those injured in the blast underwent decontamination procedures before being transported to the hospital. All of the injuries, Smith said, were related to the blast itself and not with any air quality or other chemical contamination issues. Officials said there have been no air quality issues noted since the blast and that firefighters and the city will continue to monitor for any toxins in the air.
As of Thursday, the cause of the blast was still unknown. Officials evacuated a block and a half of homes near the scene because of their blown out windows. The area also experienced a power outage, but power was restored shortly after the scene was cleared, officials said.
The Louisville Fire Department is investigating what it called a “large scale incident” involving hazardous materials. Officials told residents affected by the blast not to touch debris that remains until investigators have had time to look at it for clues. The fire department will be assisted by several agencies including the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms and OSHA.
“We don’t have any reason to believe at the moment that there was any type of nefarious activity,” said Shawn Morrow of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
It’s not the first time the plant has been the site of an explosion.
In April 2003, according to a report from the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, the facility had a fatal explosion while under different ownership. In that explosion, a “process vessel became over pressurized” at the DD Williamson & Company released 26,000 pounds of aqueous ammonia into the air and sent debris flying into the air.
That blast killed 44-year-old worker Louis Perry, and forced 26 residents to evacuate and 1,500 people to shelter in place. Authorities do not believe this week’s explosion involved the same materials as that blast.
Did Son of Sam Law Bar Convict from Spending Workers’ Comp Settlement?
Chris Parker
What Do You Think?
New York, NY (WorkersCompensation.com) -- Generally, individuals and entities seeking to collect a debt cannot access an employee’s workers’ compensation benefits. But does that apply to crime victims seek monetary compensation from convicted criminals?
Consider the case of a man convicted of murder in 2022 and sentenced to prison. Prior to that conviction, he obtained a $41,000 workers’ compensation settlement. He was later resentenced and transferred to another facility, along with his remaining settlement funds – $28,000.
The New York State Office of Victim Services, on the victim’s behalf, filed an injunction asking the court to bar the convict from spending all but $1,000 of the funds. The office brought its action under Executive Law § 632-a, commonly called the Son of Sam Law.
The court explained that the Son of Sam Law, which is intended to help crime victims obtain compensation, allows victims or their representatives to sue the convicted criminals who harmed them when the criminals receive substantial sums of money from virtually any source and protect those funds while litigation is pending. The law, however, allows the convict to keep the first $1,000.
Could Victim Services stop the convict from using the funds?
A.?No. The funds did not represent profit, such as money made of a book deal.
B. Yes.?The law pertains to funds from virtually any source.
If you selected B, you agreed with the court in Matter of the New York State Office of Victim Services v. Johnson, No. CV-23-1131 (N.Y. App. Div. 11/07/24), which held that the petitioner had access to the settlement funds.
The court pointed out that the law was originally directed solely at profits from a crime. In 2001, however, the Legislature amended the law to allow a crime victim to seek recovery from “funds of a convicted person,” which includes “all funds and property received from any source by a person convicted of a specified crime."?
“Given this background, [the convict’s] settlement funds are subject to restraint and recovery under the Son of Sam Law even though he acquired them before his conviction,” the court wrote.
The court rejected the convict’s argument that the workers’ compensation law shields the settlement funds from restraint and recovery.?
The court acknowledged that workers' compensation benefits, including the settlement funds, are exempt from creditors’ claims pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 33.
“However, the later-enacted Son of Sam Law, as amended in 2001, does not include workers' compensation benefits in its list of carve-outs,” the court wrote. Concluding that the omission was intentional, the court stated that the Son of Sam Law supersedes Workers' Compensation Law § 33.