Newfound Relevancy…Or Is It?
As we all gather in our homes during this unusual circumstance and try to be productive—or not—one ancillary factor is bound to be an increase in TV viewing. In a few of the conversations I’ve had with some of my colleagues they’re seeing it as a boon for traditional TV. I’m not as optimistic as they are.
I agree that viewership will increase across the board and all time periods will benefit but I think that streaming will grow more than traditional. Traditional Daytime and News programming will see the greatest increase mostly because of the attention in these situations to news and, in the case of Daytime, simply more available viewers. Primetime viewing will also go up because restaurants, theaters, venues are closed. The problem is the traditional sellers (cable and broadcast networks) aren’t in a position to monetize this opportunity. At all. In fact, it may hurt them even more. Here’s why.
The sellers will have increased supply of viewership but their deals for March thru June and many through August, are already done. Most of those deals were done well before any inkling of the COVID-19 pandemic was apparent. No one could have predicted we’d all be home now for an extended period. There aren’t as many marketers bold enough to throw extra money into the market as there are pulling their schedules (movie studios, cruise lines, airlines, etc.). The boon is for the marketers already in who will get bonus impressions due to the surge in viewership.
The TV networks/stations won’t be able to upcharge until their selling period for the upfront and third quarter scatter, which will be late second quarter. Their risk is to overpromise ratings continuing at this level only to return to normal ratings when people get back to their normal routines.
The networks/stations price on supply/demand, as I’m sure you know, but for them to make more money they need more demand and lower supply. They need more marketers bidding on fewer rating points to get increases. They need multiple brands to have to buy more units to achieve the same weekly ratings as they had the prior year. What we’ll have here is the opposite. More supply and less demand. Pricing will actually go down. This is the game they chose to play when thy pushed for consolidated selling seasons instead of an open fluid market. They’ve been milking a system they created for their benefit and now at a time when they are relevant, they cannot capitalize.
Read more of our thought pieces here.
Director of Media at Baldwin&
5 年Good post David, thanks for sharing. Curious to see if networks and addressable streaming services try to monetize by increasing CPMs for marketers redeploying buys initially meant for broadcast sports. 92 out of the top 100 broadcasts were live sports in 2018 so the pause on live sports is causing serious disruption to those brands.
Go-To-Market Executive @ High Hawk Partners
5 年Who still has traditional TV :) ? What will be tested is the wear out effect for ads... I am starting to get the shakes when I see Mathew McConaughey ice fishing
CEO at Vee24
5 年Good points David. A few things come to mind: 1. Flipping through the over-the-air networks, I'm shocked programming still seems quite normal. I expected news to dominate and all else to be cancelled. 2. I wonder about brand safety and being associated with the negative situation, unless of course the product solves a specific challenge in these strange times. 3. Totally agree on streaming growing more than traditional. But, how is it that it's all still working?!? In my home, it seems we now have Netflix/Prime + YouTube + video conferencing all on at the same time 9-5. Even my 1 year old's day care is starting a video circle time later this week!