Newcomer injunctions.

Newcomer injunctions.

On an issue of granting "newcomer injunctions” the Supreme Court today delivered its judgement in Wolverhampton City Council and others v London Gypsies and Travellers and others. The case was in respect of Gypsies and Travellers, but the application extends to any occupation of land without permission.

Several local authorities had secured injunctions to prevent Gypsies and Travellers from camping on their land without permission. They were addressed to "persons unknown" because of issues of identifying Gypsies and Travellers in advance. ?At the time the injunctions were granted, they had not yet camped, or threatened to camp, on the land, or indeed committed any other relevant unlawful act. The injunctions were obtained without notifying any party, at hearings where the interests of Gypsies and Travellers were not represented.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against such injunctions brought by the Gypsies and Travellers.

It ruled that the court has the power to grant an injunction against “newcomers” on an interim or final basis and on an application made without notice to those effected.

Such “newcomer injunctions” will bind anyone who has notice of it while it remains in force, even though that person had no intention and had made no threat to do the act prohibited at the time the injunction was granted.

In deciding whether to grant an injunction and upon what terms, the court will be guided by principles of justice and equity.? That is, there are already sufficient safeguards in existence to protect the interests of those effected and unrepresented.

Thus, if there is an injunction in force preventing any newcomer from camping or otherwise squatting on a site, you have two options.? Apply to set aside or vary the injunction where the court will take on board those principles of justice and equity; or don’t camp or squat there at all.

Luke Weldon is a Partner at Carbon Law Partners specialising in real estate and commercial disputes. You can contact him on luke.weldon@carbonlawpartners.com or 07816 755 372.


Stefano Passarello

Accountant and Tax expert | Crypto Tax Specialist | Board Member | Co-founder of The Kapuhala Longevity Retreats

1 å¹´

Informative update??! The Supreme Court's judgment on newcomer injunctions is a significant development. Your commitment to keeping your audience informed about crucial legal matters, especially in property law and dispute resolution, is truly appreciated. ?????

赞
回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Luke Weldon LLM的更多文章

  • High rise cladding

    High rise cladding

    In the context of the highly charged and topical issue of cladding of high-rise properties and in the case of Octagon…

  • Landlord's consent to alter

    Landlord's consent to alter

    In the case of Jacobs v Chalcot Crescent (Management Company) Limited, the High Court considered an appeal by a…

  • Mind the Registration Gap

    Mind the Registration Gap

    Yesterday, Cooke J delivered her judgement on R M Residential Ltd (RM) v Westcare Estates Ltd. & Another, a decision…

    1 条评论
  • Modifying restrictive covenants revisted

    Modifying restrictive covenants revisted

    Those who read my article on 17 November 2023 will know my view on the Upper Tribunal’s decision on Kay v Cunningham…

  • Going to court is rubbish

    Going to court is rubbish

    Last month’s well-publicised neighbour dispute between a couple and a farmer highlights the folly that sits at the…

    1 条评论
  • Your home is your castle, but will EPC requirements bring down the battlements

    Your home is your castle, but will EPC requirements bring down the battlements

    “Adapting Historic Homes for Energy Efficiency: A Review of the Barriers” was published by the Government as a combined…

  • Parking and development rights

    Parking and development rights

    On Friday, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Duchess of Bedford House RTM Company Ltd & Ors v Campden Hill…

    1 条评论
  • Kay v Cunningham on modifying restrictive covenants.

    Kay v Cunningham on modifying restrictive covenants.

    The case concerned a Grade II listed dwelling known as Lea Hurst which was the home of Florence Nightingale. Occupation…

  • Court rules on disrepair in commercial leases

    Court rules on disrepair in commercial leases

    The Court of Appeal in Gill v Lees News Ltd has provided further direction on the “fault” grounds under the Landlord…

  • Telecoms Code - Interim rent and ADR are coming...

    Telecoms Code - Interim rent and ADR are coming...

    Last year there came the trips-off-the-tongue Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022 (PSTIA)…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了