The New Zealand Property Market disaster - and solution?

The New Zealand Property Market disaster - and solution?

Houston, we have a problem. You don’t know about us, but we’re a little country at the bottom of the world that has a huge and growing inequality issue. It’s not race, but homes. You’ll know a little about what I’m going to say, but spend the 2.5 minutes to read on, I have an idea. And some people aren’t going to like it.?

So what’s the problem - a growing, but now peak housing affordability issue. We’re literally the lowest in the world, if you invert it, we’re leading the world. House prices are nearing 12X the median income. Up from 3X just over 20 years ago. But unlike our world leading medal tally at the Olympics, for example, this is a dirty little not-so-secret. It's a statistic that no-one is crowing about.??

My own situation for transparency - it’s here for you to see on Linkedin, but to break it down. I invest in a range of asset classes - but NOT residential property. I own some commercial and industrial properties. These are rented to businesses who employ staff and pay taxes. I also work with entrepreneurs who want to buy their own building; I go in on one side of the transaction with them on the other. I’ve added significant value to every building I own. I have equities, a little crypto and am ‘long’ in the Angel investment space in New Zealand. I have been able to do this as I’ve started several companies that employ people, deliver products and services and pay taxes.?

I’m going to lay out my reasoning and then suggest a solution.?And hope my friends still want to be that way after reading this!

  1. So, I believe residential property is NOT an investment class, it is the place that we live, raise our families, love, get old, and die. And it should be both considered so, and treated this way by our government. Developers or people who add significant value to a house - this IS an investment as demonstrable value is being added.
  2. Buy, rent and hold. No, no, just no. I’m not implying that this is in any way illegal, but rather it's immoral - if you choose to define morality as “for the greater good” - which I clearly am. I know of one successful baby boomer business person who thought NOT to school himself in equities, venture investment, crypto, commercial property or ANYTHING else. He took his business profits and bought over 100 homes. Which are all rented. And no real value added to any of them. Maybe a lick of paint. And this ‘smart’ investor has seen his wealth increase by 30+% in just the last year… while helping increase the divide between the haves and have nots.?
  3. We’re staring into an abyss of poverty (see www.thefacts.nz for data) for the majority of New Zealand, where most are unable to enjoy the opportunity of owning their own home. If you understand our founding European fathers, they collectively left the UK and Europe to escape the massive inequality (aka Class System) that existed. They were butchers, bakers and candlestick makers and they wanted a better life for themselves and families. They wanted to own a home. And for generations this was a reality. And now, unless you own a home today, or you have a ‘property investor’ in the family, or wealthy parents - you will rent your home forever. This just doesn’t seem right to me.?
  4. Government laziness, lies, not following through on election promises (I mean really, Labour you should be embarrassed of yourselves - losing your capital gains tax opportunity) plus the huge conflict of interest that exists; many politicians own multiple homes. How can we expect them to pass legislation that will cost them wealth? It just won’t happen.?
  5. I’m reminded of the tragedy of the commons - where people who are left to self manage the volume of their grazing cattle in a late 1600’s Boston public space. The reality is that people didn’t take only what was enough for themselves, they take all they can. Kind of like Marxism (Communism) - which is why this form of governing failed.?

So what’s the solution? If we agree on the points I’ve raised above, therefore the only solution is a financial penalty? This is a complicated and nuanced arena, and appreciate I’m simply making a suggestion here that COULD work, but would need a huge amount of finessing.

Note - this doesn’t apply to developers. We need these risktakers:?

  • Income and Sale (Capital Gains) Tax; the longer you’ve held the (non primary residence) property, the higher the tax rate you pay on it. If you've overleveraged you’ve probably been greedy. And the greedy should realise those penalties.?
  • Any provable alterations or developments are tax deductible - if you add value, you realise the benefit of this deduction?
  • Introduce a cumulative effect, for every 10x properties you own, your tax rate increases by 10% net?

I suspect if you own multiple homes this will incense you. If you own one or none, probably not. So, for transparency's sakes, please - indicate which you are if you choose to comment.

New Zealand - politicians and residential property investors - well done. You’ve made Aussie banks and Real Estate Agents rich, and our children destitute.?

Thanks @geoffneal for your help on this, plus data insights!

Disclaimer

My wife and I own a modest apartment. I rented for 6 years before this (marriage dissolution and travel). I’ve owned my own home for 20ish years. During the GFC when my timing was terrible, I owned my (then) current home and couldn’t sell my previous one. As soon as the market recovered I sold the secondary property.?

Sanjay Bhowmick

Management & Entrepreneurship educator

1 年

Great write-up Josh and the evolution of your committment. Inspiring. You are right, of course, that housing is not a business or should not be. When housing as an industry is pushed to lead the economy rather than deriving benefit from the thriving of more productive human activities, nsocial decline is beecomes visible. I'd add a word of caution about your sweeping remark on communism's doom due to the Hardin's pronouncement of a theoretical inevitability of tragedy of the commons. It is now established that tragedy is not inevitable and that the tragdy would happen because the farmers don't communicate, as in the prisoners' dilemma payoff structure. It is found time and time again that, communities left to themselvs to govern their commons (with ownership responsibilities along with rights) have worked out ways for community wide wellbeing deriving from the commons, with mutually agreed plans and rules, graduatd sanctions for violations by members and non-members, etc (see lifelong worldwide research of Elenor Ostrom and team). I believe the mind shift needed for productive engagement that brings balanced economic benefits and soceital wellbeing could only begin, for the long term, with a more selfless cadre of educators.

回复
Trevor Keen

Founder & CEO at Conscious Healthcare SA

2 年

What a fantastic post Josh Comrie my wife Laura Keen are certainly greater educated in this space from having read it. It’s also made me think about my future investment strategy in regards to property. For transparency sake I own one investment property and currently rent. I love how you’ve put a real moral compass into investing If only the world was encouraged to lean this way we could all share our incredible skills and abilities to make the world a better place.

Hugh Lloyd

Tell them what you are going to tell them (#CV) Tell them (#interview) Tell them what you have told them (#referee)

2 年

Stamp duty would go a long way to reduce the short term and flipping market and is fundamentally user pays - in Australia a $2 million house would cost $94,862.40 to change ownership from one entity to another - this is separate from capital gains - https://stampduty.calculatorsaustralia.com.au/ Certainly take the heat out of the lower end flipping or short term gain market

回复
Josh Comrie

I help founders scale, solve and exit to freedom | Adviser | Founder | Speaker | Investor

2 年

Interesting wander into virtual property here from Scott Galloway. Most things from him are worthy! @profgalloway All of which raises a significant question: Where should people put their money? Typically, crises offer buying opportunities for the next generation, as they come into their prime earning years in the wake of a reset. Just as earthquakes relieve geological pressure, decreased asset values are a societal release, birthing a key component of any healthy economy: churn. But this time, our boomer-dominated government employed Covid-19 as cloud cover to protect and extend the wealth of the already rich. Suppressing volatility protects the incumbents; for the first time in U.S. history, a 30-year-old is not doing as well as his/her parents at 30. The result? Young people are creating their own asset classes and volatility. In 2021, these forces manifested in crypto and meme stocks, which offered a mix of volatility, a halo of technology, and a lively cast of aggressive carnival barkers (i.e. evangelists).

Simon Mundell

Strategic Adviser, Business Strategist, Global Keynote Speaker, Entrepreneur, Investor.

2 年

While property has personally given me great returns over the years it's not a 'productive asset' which is where investment is needed the most. The new lending laws coming into play soon will likely make this even more difficult. We should incentivise investments that will help improve productively. We consistently rank as having one of the worst productivity rates in the in the OECD. Combine this with limited access to capital (other than for bricks and mortar) then its not surprising that we are where we are. Josh for PM!!!!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了