New York City Taxi Limo Commission Needs Data About Your Rides?

New York City Taxi Limo Commission Needs Data About Your Rides?

On Monday, the Future of Privacy Forum joined with the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Electronic Frontier Foundation,  The Constitution Project, and Tech Freedom to write the NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) about its proposed rules that add new trip reporting requirements for for-hire vehicle (FHV) bases, such as Uber, Lyft and others.

The proposed rule would create significant privacy risks by mandating that FHV bases collect and transmit passenger drop-off time and location data, which can be highly sensitive information. The proposed rule poses particular risks in light of the TLC’s current data collection—FHV bases must already report the date, time, and location of passenger pick-ups—and the history of similar passenger data held by TLC becoming publicly available in response to Freedom of Information requests. With the addition of drop-off data, the TLC’s data set would provide the TLC and the public with a comprehensive view of the movements of individual New Yorkers.

The Commission has proposed this rule change in order to reduce the risks associated with fatigued driving. However, it is unclear how the collection of precise location information—information that includes details of the day-to-day activities, lifestyles, and habits of millions of individuals—will achieve this end. Driver fatigue results from long periods of time on the road, which is information the TLC could ascertain from collecting trip duration rather than pick-up and drop-off location information of individual passengers. At minimum, the TLC should explore ways to: 1) tailor the data collection more narrowly to the stated purpose by focusing on trip duration rather than the location of passengers’ trips; 2) collect less precise, more general geographic information; and 3) enact policies and procedures that detail the privacy and security protections for such sensitive data.

The deadline to comment on this proposed rule is tomorrow but you can comment by just sending them a quick email. Or you can show up on Thursday to speak. Find the full rule and details about how to attend or comment here.

Note that once one city agency has this data, others may seek it as well! Consider weighing in. The FPF, CDT, EFF letter can be found here.

Jules Polonetsky is CEO of the Future of Privacy Forum, a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy leadership and scholarship, advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies.


Héla Ben Miled Bey

Chargée de projet senior Commission de Venise et Instance Nationale de Prévention de la Torture chez Conseil de l'Europe

8 年

The collection of information location is not adequate or relevant with the purpose of reducing the risks associated with drivers fatigue. Data collection must be limite to what is necessary

Marc Schultz

Director of Data Privacy and Security at Paytronix Systems

8 年

We must insist on transparency (meaningful and timely disclosure) with attention to the appropriateness of what data is collected and assurances it is being protected during the time it is in the custody of the the collector. When any of these elements are missing our trust is challenged. The proposed collection and described sharing needs to be refined.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jules Polonetsky的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了