A New Year’s Resolution for Forecasters: Stop It
Weather forecaster Michael Fish famously reassured BBC viewers in 1987 that no hurricane was headed for Britain. He was spectacularly wrong. Photo: Pa/Zuma Press

A New Year’s Resolution for Forecasters: Stop It

There are two kinds of forecasters: those who don’t know, and those who don’t know they don’t know. 
John Kenneth Galbraith, 1993

It’s the start of a new year – and, with that, come resolutions that see us promising to sweep out old habits and commit to new behaviours that ensure we end the year in better shape. One new year’s resolution that is likely to get investors of all shapes and sizes into better form is a commitment to stop forecasting.  

Imagine if, at the start of 2020, you were asked to estimate world economic growth for that year. Or, in 2021, you were asked to forecast the rate of inflation for the US economy for that year. Or, if at the start of 2022, you were given the opportunity to name the country that would have three prime ministers in two months. Each of these is an important investment question, as the outcomes have implications for currencies, interest rates, company earnings, and asset prices. Knowing the answers to these questions a year in advance, would give any investor a gigantic advantage. This is why so many investors devote so much effort to figuring out the answers to questions like these – and the start of the new year is the most-favoured season for this endeavour. Yet, again and again, the world delivers surprises – or even shocks – that show just how hard it is to figure out what tomorrow looks like, which is how we arrived at a 4.9% contraction in 2000; 7.0% inflation in the US in 2021, the greatest increase since 1982; and three prime ministers and four ministers of finance in the UK in 2022.    

At the end of each year, John Authers runs a fun exercise that shows just how powerful reliable forecasting is as an investment tool. In his column, Points of Return, Authers reports on the performance of the fictitious investment firm, Hindsight Capital, and the success of the firm’s strategy. And year after year Hindsight Capital delivers spectacular returns because its managers are in command of the one strategy guaranteed to beat all others without fail: hindsight.

In 2022, Hindsight Capital’s managers made some exceptional calls in January, including that Vladimir Putin really would invade Ukraine; China's economy would take strain from the omicron variant; inflation would not be transitory, and instead would entrench itself; and interest rates would hike far quicker and further than markets expected, putting pressure on security valuations around the world. As John Authers notes the potential gains for someone with this ability are infinite. Shorting Tesla Inc., FTX Tokens, and the ARK Innovation ETF would have delivered gains of 69%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. After the returns experienced around the world in 2022, most investors would grab these types of results with both hands if Hindsight Capital really existed.

But Authers suggests that identifying names with this type of razor-sharp vision makes the exercise a little unfair. Instead, he proposes that Hindsight Capital should be limited to identify broad themes. With this constraint in place, Hindsight Capital’s team bought US defence contractors and went short Ukrainian stocks (+244%); and they also went long the S&P 500 energy sector and short S&P 500 automakers (+354%). In a contrarian bet on autocrats, they went long Recep Tayyip Erdo?an and short Putin by buying Turkish firms and selling Russian equities (+234%). Hindsight Capital also invested in integrated oil and gas firms, which they funded by shorting global wind energy (+101%). As with every other year on record, seeing backwards delivered another set of fantastic returns for Hindsight Capital.  

While it's a fun exercise, there is a serious undertone to this thought experiment. All of Hindsight Capital’s calls were contrarian, at odds with market consensus. Individually, each of the ideas would have looked foolish based on the mood at the start of 2022. And if presented as a strategy, at best, the ideas would have been regarded as folly, and more likely lunacy. This is an important point to make at the start of each year where there is a penchant for identifying the big drivers of the year ahead – as if markets are somehow calendarized – and then positioning portfolios for those themes.

Whilst anecdotal, the annual quiz exercise, and the Hindsight Capital though experiment, show just how hard it is to peer into the murky distance. And these anecdotes are supported by rafts of empirical evidence that reach cross time, asset classes, and countries that show almost no relationship between forecasts and outcomes. Yet, the temptation to forecast persists, because the world is complex, and we are human. But we are bad at forecasting for the same reasons: the world is complex, and we are human. Put simply, the temptation to forecast is ever-present, powerful, and seductive. But this is a dangerous investment habit, and one that should be broken quicker than any other New Year's resolution.

We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.
 George Orwell, 1946.

Bob Newhart’s skit, where he acts as the therapist, Dr Switzer, to his patient, Katherine Bigmans, gives us all the guidance we need when it comes to the habit of forecasting. Newhart tells his patient that there are just two words that she needs to remember when it comes to changing her behaviour, and that he finds “… most people can remember them.” Bob Newhart goes on: “Here they are: Stop it!” 

If you want to do your investments a big favour in 2023, here’s the resolution when it comes to forecasting: “Stop it.” This leaves us with the question of what we should do in the place of trying to see around corners. Thankfully, there is an excellent substitute. 

With the benefit of hindsight, many of the greatest investors have three permanent features in their portfolios. They own good assets, at good prices, and they diversify to manage risk. And many – not all – add a good dose of patience. This might mean that at the start of the new year you own some high quality emerging market equity which looks extremely attractively priced; inflation-linked bonds to deal with not-so-transitory inflation; fewer dollars, which are expensive, and more South Korean won, which look cheap; some physical gold, which is a powerful diversifier; and perhaps TSMC, a shunned Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturing firm trading on 13 times earnings. And if you’re wondering what the event of 2023 will mean for these investments, stop it. This is a diversified portfolio of good assets, owned at good prices, which gives us the single best investment approach across all times and all markets. And while we wait for foresight to become hindsight, I wish you a wonderful 2023.    

------

A shorter version of this article by Adrian Saville was first published by Business Day on 8 January 2023.

Timothy van Blerck

Building payment products better

2 年

This together with the idea that everything magically resets on 1 Jan every year.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Adrian Saville的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了