New Technologies for New Jobs

New Technologies for New Jobs

The unpreceded advancement of technology at the end of the previous and at the beginning of this century already makes it possible for most of the work now performed by humans to be done by robots supported by artificial intelligence.

There is a fear that there will be fewer jobs and unemployment will increase substantially. Such concern is undoubtedly justified, but the (neo-liberal) economists try to convince us that new technologies create new jobs. That we have nothing to fear.

Wait a minute. New technologies create new jobs. Is it really the purpose of new technology to create new jobs? I'm a little confused.

Let's look back a bit back to the time when a primitive man invented a spear that helped him catch wild game and a plug that made it easier to work on the field. Did he really create these tools to create more jobs? 

No, certainly not. He invented them to make life easier for him, to have more time for joy and rest. To create new technology only to create new jobs, to work more, and to create more stress definitely makes no sense. On the other hand, it also does not make any sense to develop new technology which causes that people lose their jobs.

What can we do then? Should we stop the development? Should we stop inventing? Not at all. We just have to rethink about what technology is meant for. We have to recognize that the only purpose of developing new technologies is to make life better, more comfortable, and more pleasant.

For a good life, we do not need jobs. We only need work to be done. We need food, we need housing, we need entertainment. "Bread and games," as it was said in Old Rome.

If we develop a technology that allows us to do the same work more efficiently, with less effort and in a shorter time, why should we still work same or even more than before? Why not work less and spend more time on personal development, family, friends, and entertainment? Is not this what the technology meant for -- to make life better?

With the invention of new technologies, we merely make rich men even richer. Due to increase efficiency, we create an abundance of products that nobody needs, which has a devastating effect on ecology. 

To increase the demand, we have to create new needs by aggressively advertising these products. More and more jobs are created in advertising, which produces nothing useful.

It is time to shorten work week (15 or less hours) to produce only goods that we need (no need to create new needs), which will raise the quality of our life (more free time, more time spent with family and friends) and at the same time help to preserve nature and prevent ecological disaster.Enormous and imp

Do you know that cost of human life is calculated (different for a doctor than for a craftman) and if the profit is greate than that cost, he is expendable.

Dick, please answer me to this question: What is the purpose of automatizatuo if the total amount of work (including production of machines and maintainance) is not reduced?

回复

In short, if efficiency increases (which you do agree) you need less human work for the same job. So...

回复

Dick, yes robots are not perfect but are getting better and better. Also, people are not perfect. They cause many accidents. However, capital does not care. What is cheaper is cheaper.

And also, not all the people have or will have the necessary skils for high tech. So we must let tjhem die, becouse there will be no jobs for them.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sa?o Toma?i?的更多文章

  • COVID-19 revealed the fragility of the current economic system

    COVID-19 revealed the fragility of the current economic system

    I do not want to go into whether the measures taken to combat the COVId 19 pandemic were right, too late, too early…

  • Why global debt can never be repaid?

    Why global debt can never be repaid?

    Global debt, the debt of the real sector to the financial sector, is rising steadily (see…

    9 条评论
  • Why is global debt continuously increasing?

    Why is global debt continuously increasing?

    Global debt is continuously increasing. According to Bloomberg, it already reached $244 trillion, which is much more…

    3 条评论
  • The paradox of economic growth

    The paradox of economic growth

    Economic growth -- why is it a paradox? On the one hand, the current economy depends on growth while on the other hand,…

    27 条评论
  • The dark side of Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies).

    The dark side of Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies).

    In 2008 Nakamoto published the paper "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" which was the beginning of the…

    14 条评论
  • Economy And Self-Service Breakfast

    Economy And Self-Service Breakfast

    Earth is under high stress. On the one hand, we extensively consume non-renewable natural resources, on the other hand,…

    7 条评论
  • I (naively) believed that Facebook is a free and democratic medium.

    I (naively) believed that Facebook is a free and democratic medium.

    It was many years ago when I was working on some project with a professor at MIT. At that time Facebook was something…

    5 条评论
  • Have we learned something from the crisis in 2008?

    Have we learned something from the crisis in 2008?

    All I can say as an answer to the question in the title: OBVIOUSLY NOT. Governments saved financial sector (banks…

  • GDP is not Good Indicator of Successful Economy

    GDP is not Good Indicator of Successful Economy

    The growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is usually considered as the indicator of a successful economy. To see why I…

    33 条评论
  • Why Economy Can't Grow Anymore

    Why Economy Can't Grow Anymore

    After reading many comments on my posts, I realized that practically nobody (99,9% of people) understands exponential…

    57 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了