A New Social Paradigm
Falcon wishing he had better social media...

A New Social Paradigm

We all know that Social Media is broken.

I’d like to propose a solution.

It’s not a simple solution, none of these things are.

It’s not profitable, at least not in the traditional sense, but that’s by design.

The back story we all know.

Where we are is that there are many social media platforms, some the result of intentional design, some the cumulative manipulations of many or few, whose express purpose is to extract value for their owners.

As with all capitalist endeavours, it’s not enough for profitability. It’s line go up, all the time. Which inevitably leads to no innovation, pure enshittifcation, and undermining of any ability for any content creators to actually make money from the platforms.

This, in turn, means they are only working for the exposure or for a convoluted and high-effort endgame of third-party advertisers, Patreon (etc.), and, of course, merch.

Companies end up squeezing their users until they simply quit.

And now, backfilling with AI slop.

In the end, the platforms will probably fail.

The content creators are struggling, suffering at the whim of lower revenues, poor discovery, and whatever insanity ‘this week’ from ‘the algorithm.’ Causing stress, burnout, and struggle.

The advertisers are getting fewer and lower quality impressions for their ads, many of which are being shown to people who don’t care. Costs keep going up, and the ROI is going down.

The content consumers desperately want good content, community, and experiences they can enjoy. As time goes on, they find themselves trying to filter out meaningless drivel, or, worse, just giving into the slop. Diversity is decreasing. Interesting content is going away. Personal connections are fading.

In the process, the only people being served are the investors - but, even then, only on the short term.

Social Media is coming to a cliff, and the only solution seems to be shingles of the old versions, like BlueSky, with the hopes of drawing in the audience away from the former powerhouse that has gone to hell.

Rarely do these platforms offer something new. Often, they offer less, simply with better manipulations. Like TikTok.

The framework for change.

I would like to propose a framework for change; one that is, perhaps, a bit naive, but I think stands to do very well. Because it’s not just different in the entire business model, but it is tailored to the needs of all parties. Even the investors, assuming the investors care at all about sustainability.

The only way social media stands to evolve with society, and not suffer the boom/bust cycles of tech is for it to be fundamentally different.

That means that creators need to be able to spend more time on creating, and less time trying to be brand managers, filters for scams, or otherwise selling their soul to whomever might want to pay for it.

It means that advertisers must be able to get higher value ad spots, better managed, and transparent.

Consumers need to be able to consume what they want to consume. Ads are a given, but should be meaningful and appropriate. The ads, themselves, shouldn’t be scams.

Algorithms need to evolve away from maximizing viewership in the most predatory way possible to something that suits the needs of creators, advertisers and consumers.

And, as mentioned, investors need to be willing to accept modest growth that is driven by innovation, quality, and value to other stakeholders.

All of that must be built on transparency. The business needs to be transparent to all. That means margins are known and understood. Methods are known and understood. And, most of all, everyone can understand how various algorithms work - how they’re weighted, what metrics they’re using, and how they can be tailored.

Complexity from Simplicity.

In general, the goal is to create a highly adaptive platform that is able to adapt to the shifting needs of its users, however defined. The core to that is a user management system that ensures that content created by a user, can be downloaded in bulk, with offline management tools. For a creator, that can be all of their statistics, videos, text. For a consumer, it can be references to all comments and interactions, subscriptions, and more. For an advertiser, it’s a breakdown of all campaigns, copy, reach, and leads.

Single point management for all of it, with the ability to be stored offline, and managed with absolute transparency. Security is built in from the start.

From that, one can build innovative delivery mechanisms. New ways to interact between each user type. New ways to create ads. Whatever. All are managed and stored in the user account that can always be offloaded by the user if they want.

Users own their data. It is not for sale, and while there may be means to sell one’s content to AI companies, it will always be opt-in.

AI content will be generally forbidden, at least within clear guidelines.

The platform concept.

Right now, there’s no longer anything particularly special about any particular social media platform. Some have distinct niches - like LinkedIn in the professional community - but that is only a function of the lack of interest of anyone else to try and enter the space.

Building a platform is non-trivial, even if you rip off a third party’s code. It takes time, expertise, and infrastructure.

The real innovation stands to be built around content control, delivery, and diversification.

Imagine, if you will, an app. The app has multiple tabs, just like any browser, across the top.

Each tab is a different style of social media; video, shorts, short form, long form, article, professional and forum. Each has its own tailored feed, that works much like sites like YouTube, Twitter, Discord.

Across the bottom, there’s another set of tabs.

Account, creator, consumer, advertiser, corporate.

The account is like every other site. The creator is where a creator uploads and manages their content. Meaningful stats, tools, management, security. The consumer is where you choose how to set up your feeds. Advertiser gives companies similar management tools. Corporate is a window into everything about the platform.

Each section is tailored to give the information that the user needs. Discovery, tracking, and algorithm information.

Granular tools where you can see how the algorithm breaks down for your needs. While impractical to describe the algorithm writ large, each user can have the ability to influence variables as they apply to their feeds in each vertical so that you, the user, can have meaningful control over what ends up in your feed.

Ownership

Ownership is usually where social media goes wrong. As previously described, investors want to milk it for everything, or it’s used for other manipulations.

In the end, I think the best scenario is much like the “corporate democracy” that I described in a previous article (link). Investors should make money. But the exit is planned; the users (consumers, advertisers, creators) are the ones buying out the stock at a controlled rate.

Or, conversely, they can hold the stock and receive predictable ROI in the form of dividends that are managed percentages from the performance of the company as a whole.

It’s not that people can’t make money, it just has to be sustainable.

Getting new users

The holy grail of any new platform is collecting users.

Typically, this is viewed as being difficult for many reasons, not the least of which is the mismatch between creators and users.

Firstly, I would argue that part of that is that creators have little reason to switch because the ROI is often tiny - unless you’re a high-profile creator being paid to lure both users and creators to a platform.

Second, when the systems are transparent, do not limit a creator from posting elsewhere, and there are clear financial gains by supporting the new platform.

Given the nature of the platform, there’s a real incentive for creators to upload existing content to the platform, and create new content for it. I would expect that this could create robust organic growth as creators draw their new audience to the new platform - because it will fans want to help creators do better.

The key is ensuring that the systems are robust and advertisers are developed so that the creators can be adequately paid for the effort. Through transparency guarantees and growth strategies are clear, my expectation is that creators would simply have no choice but gradually move to a platform that shows them respect and ownership.

Nothing is guaranteed.

But something has to change.

I would love to find people who are interested in moving this forward. What I’ve outlined here is merely a start. I have thoughts on actual structures, and how the whole thing would work, of course, but that's a discussion for another day.

Susan Furnell

AI RESET | Who Controls AI, Controls the Future

6 天前

I agree we need one. There are barriers though : 1. If there is a danger people will in the future be hounded for posting legitimate thoughts against the dominant narrative, it might need to be decentralised and anonymous . But if it’s decentralised, our voices might not reach prominent people like regulators and policy makers because they will mistrust such a libertarian system 2. For every reasonable voice speaking neutrally about some things and against the main narrative with logic and strategy , the new social media platform will attract a lot of cranks and conspiracy theorists who would also move to it. If there is no censorship , we can’t block these and most of us who aren’t conspiracy theorists but simply want to change the balance of power rationally don’t want to be on a platform riddled with this type of content 3. I think that for it to work there would have to be a plausible plan to get a lot of very high profile people with massive followings that people mind not hearing from to move to the new platform . They would need to tell their followers to move wirth them to the new platform . 4. There are failures to learn from if we do it eg Steemit tried this but never achieved main stream success .

回复
Tammy Graham

Hybrid Growth Leader for a Trust-Driven, AI-Powered World

1 周

This reminds me of when people realized the internet needed to move beyond Web 1.0. There’s a similar “epoch shift” vibe here. Social platforms that center creators and audiences rather than exploiting them are the natural evolution, and whoever pulls it off will be remembered as the one who redefined the social contract online.

回复

It should be safe, the same as our laws were meant to keep people and children safe, those thatnprovided the platforms now have a duty to sort things because they delivered criminals to inside our homes and to children behind our backs, through not designing safe environments for their customers, Failure to make reasonable adjustments, and failure to deliver safe products, So now there is no choice other than to correct this completely!

回复
Joel Iwashige

?? Ending overwhelm for biz owners. Coaching, support, and tools to build a business that reflects your superpowers, not your stress dreams.

1 周

My sense is that the Fediverse starts moving toward what you're talking about?

John Ogilvie

Since 2007, I've helped federal Cdn clients with their IT. Since 2020, I've helped a dozen clients sort out cloud. I'm a serial startup CEO, so I help my clients build great solutions, fast, clean, secure, and no drama.

1 周

Bluesky?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kris Holland的更多文章

  • Restructuring Canada for Resliency

    Restructuring Canada for Resliency

    So I have an idea. What's described here is a first draft, and is less broad or organized than such a thing should be.

    44 条评论
  • Corporate Democracy

    Corporate Democracy

    A movement. It’s funny - not funny - how the world can change so quickly.

    15 条评论
  • Building something new...

    Building something new...

    A while back, I talked about a #movement. I articulated some general ideas that got a lot of people excited.

    23 条评论
  • Crafting a movement.

    Crafting a movement.

    I had a conversation yesterday, here on #LinkedIn. The conversation was about change.

    24 条评论
  • Writing a script for a self promo piece.

    Writing a script for a self promo piece.

    Since I released my promo piece last year, I periodically get questions asking "how do I do that for myself/my thing?"…

    1 条评论
  • Autodesk did the right thing... sort of.

    Autodesk did the right thing... sort of.

    Recently I wrote an article in which I expressed my irritation of a promotion put forward by Autodesk. Offering 25% off…

    7 条评论
  • Best of intentions, worst of executions.

    Best of intentions, worst of executions.

    To all, followers, friends, passers by… Earlier this year, you may noticed my taking on a bit of a war with Autodesk…

    21 条评论
  • Looking at Onshape for CAD

    Looking at Onshape for CAD

    Introduction Following this introduction and my impressions, I have an interview with Onshape to address many of my…

  • Autodesk Permanent license holders -Get in touch ASAP

    Autodesk Permanent license holders -Get in touch ASAP

    *note, the time has passed. However, I will be chatting with other investors in the near future, so don't hesitate to…

    16 条评论
  • Addendum open letter to Autodesk permanent license holders.

    Addendum open letter to Autodesk permanent license holders.

    *note, if your'e a permanent license holder, please scroll to the link at the bottom for timely (and time sensitive)…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了