New Nature article on the internationalization of science in Japan

Interesting article on the internationalization of science in Japan and Asia

https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v524/n7564/full/524S16a.html

This article just appeared in Nature, discussing benefits and difficulties of being a foreigner research in Japan if compared to the rest of Asia/Oceania. I quite agree with the picture described by Dr. Shigeo Koyasu about RIKEN and, on average, the relatively good scientific life at the institute for foreign staff. I have no regrets to have moved to RIKEN more than 20 years ago: this has been an outstanding human and scientific experience. My life would not have been the same.

I would like to note few points on internationalization, which shows quite a spotted features (both at RIKEN and outside): whereas some center or some laboratories are very international, other still have to find their way. This does not help, delaying the creation of a critical intellectual mass. There should be incentives for those that internationalize, and pressure for those that do not make of internationalization and a priority. Furthermore, colleagues should be convinced at first that internationalization is good for them. Research shows that diversity (including more women) leads to better science and more intellectual property. Science in USA is a clear demonstration that diversity plays an important role. At RIKEN, I can cite our main project, the FANTOM https://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/), which would not have worked at all without its complete internationalization from its inception 15 years ago.

Apart from trying to always create better conditions, I remain committed also to convince colleagues that a research experience in Japan (and in particular at RIKEN) is a very valid career option.