New Gen Payments Hub

Financial institutions are increasingly looking for novel ways to stay competitive in the evolving payments industry. The proliferation of challenger banks and fintechs, coupled with shifting customer preferences, means that companies must adapt quickly to emerging trends, or risk losing market share.

If these sound familiar, it’s because they’re not new. Once the focus was on financial institutions in the 2000s, payments hubs did not see widespread adoption due to a variety of reasons. And even in cases where hubs were implemented, the software is now often outdated. But with new approaches to hub architecture on the rise, payment hubs are worth revisiting, the report concludes.

A background on payments hubs

The value proposition of payments hubs “was that a hub would be a facility that integrated multiple payment systems and allowed a financial institution to approve, initiate, and repair payments from a central point, eliminating system redundancies… thereby reducing total cost of ownership.”

This was important because the way commercial banks made money had been changing over the preceding decades. Instead of generating the majority of their revenue through lending and other credit related services, banks have relied more on fees generated by transaction banking products, particularly payments. Payments hubs were thus an opportunity for banks to improve the efficiency of their payments operations and shore up margins, improving competitiveness.

However, the hubs never really caught on as expected. Adopting the hubs was a multiyear process that required large investments. As a result, only large financial institutions embarked on this endeavour, and even then, they took an incremental approach in order to minimize the risk of operational failure.

Changes in the payments landscape: opportunity with payments hubs

Although the first generation of payments hubs did not deliver on their original promise, due to a variety of factors, hubs can play a big role in the future.

One factor is that the rapid pace of technological change is rendering financial institutions’ legacy systems outdated. The surge in faster payment systems, such as U.S. Real-Time Payments (RTP) and E.U. SEPA Instant Payments, is causing banks to focus on modernizing with technology that supports faster payments. Additionally, the need to embed ISO 20022 messaging into the payments lifecycle, and new developments in cross-border clearing and settlement, requires updates to existing infrastructure.

Another factor is that new government regulations are requiring banks to change their infrastructure in order to comply with the rules. One well-known regulation is Europe’s PSD2, which is accelerating the adoption of open banking in that region. Canada’s ambitious modernization programme is another example. These trends are causing banks to explore payments hubs again.

“Banks have to re-evaluate and modernize their infrastructure because of new regulations and technological changes anyway, so it now makes sense to consider adopting payments hubs.”

There’s also the fact that customer preferences are changing. Consumers want seamless banking experiences that are responsive in real-time, just like the social media or e-commerce applications they commonly use. Businesses want value-added services tailored to their specific needs rather than standardized banking products. The current legacy systems that many financial institutions rely on simply are not dynamic enough to keep up with changing preferences.

The new payments hubs: digital ecosystems

The newest generation of payments hubs differ from their older counterparts in key ways.

While the original hubs required huge sums of money and a massive overhaul to a bank’s entire system, the new generation of hubs do not.

In contrast to the monolithic hubs of the past, the new payments hubs are more akin to digital payments ecosystems: service-focused, cloud-based, highly configurable, and API-centric. They are also fintech-friendly, as banks increasingly see fintechs as necessary partners in modernization, rather than business adversaries.

As a result, adopting new hubs does not require a company to “rip and replace” their entire payment infrastructure. This means that the new hubs are more accessible to smaller institutions that missed out on the last wave of hubs.

Crucially, the new hubs support real-time processing and ISO 20022 standards, and are much easier to upgrade to keep up with compliance. And these new, dynamic digital payments ecosystems enable institutions to provide the user experience that customers have come to expect. The report outlines some key features of the newest iteration of hubs:

• A design that supports open banking interaction through APIs
• Real-time infrastructure that supports both consumer and corporate payment requests 24×7
• Cloud-readiness for operating in public, private, or hybrid cloud models and able to mix and match where services and data run based on a bank’s deployment and data security requirements
• Omni channel to accommodate “anywhere, any way I want” client service requirements
• Standards-based with ISO 20022 as the default messaging choice for real-time systems globally, as well as next generation iterations of older RTGS and ACH systems
• Ability for every function to be accessed as a service or micro-service

By providing dynamic features in an easily integrated and upgraded form, modern hubs enable banks to offer customers the products they want, when they want them. The hubs also aid banks in complying with new regulatory obligations and shifting market pressures. And they finally deliver on the efficiency and time-to-market promises of the original hubs.