The New Era of Digital Currencies and "Green Fascism": Analyzing the Trends and Predictions
Kamil Sedzimir
Supply Chain and Logistics Leader | Quality Control Manager | Advocates for Regenerative Economies | NoConsensus.World Founder
As blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies keep growing in use, there are concerns and controversies surrounding the impacts that these technologies will have in the future, especially regarding finance and the environment. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, seen earlier as tools for decentralization and financial liberty, are increasingly becoming synonymous with introducing Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). These state-run digital monies are expected to revolutionize the functioning of economies and, by inference, change the very fabric of societies. Against this backdrop, let's consider the CHIA cryptocurrency project and its creation of "climate wallets," along with potential threats from the carbon credit market.
Chia Network: Net Zero Blockchain and "Climate Wallets"
Chia Network is an innovative cryptocurrency project. Unlike traditional cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, whose huge levels of energy consumption were roundly criticized, Chia does it differently. It is more environmentally friendly because it uses Proof of Space and Time, which is claimed to have less effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is being looked at with interest by both investors and environmentalists.
One important element of the Chia Network is the so-called "climate wallets" that allow the buying and trading of carbon credits. These credits provide for the compensation of carbon dioxide emissions through investments in environmental protection projects such as reforestation or lake preservation. There is a concern that this system could lead to digital appropriation of natural areas by owning the contracts of the carbon credits.
Carbon Credits: History and Controversies
The carbon credit market was largely initiated by Richard Sandor, known as the "father of the carbon credits market." He played a significant role in the creation of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), the world's first greenhouse gas emissions trading system. It is worth noting that Sandor, as Senior Vice President at Drexel Burnham Lambert, worked during the junk bond scandal involving Michael Milken. Milken introduced many controversial practices to finance that continue to impact current markets.
A significant portion of all carbon credits in the market are essentially considered junk and ineffective, and one can similarly draw a comparison here with junk bonds. Most of the credits do not achieve what they were intended to; instead, it is argued that the whole carbon credit market is motivated by greed and financial interests. It is very paramount to note that for every carbon credit transaction, there lie great financial interests that characterize many times the real ecological intentions.
CBDCs and Social Control
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are seen as the next step in the evolution of financial systems. Being state-backed and centrally managed, however, means that the state would ultimately take control of its people's monetary flows, leading to debates over privacy and individual freedom.
领英推荐
Among the things directly criticized in relation to the introduction of CBDCs is their applicability to strict social behavior control. For example, on the CHIA platform, 'climate wallets' could enable the government to implement taxes for exhaled carbon dioxide or high-emission products, and even for traveling over a few kilometers from an individual's place of residence. Such prohibitions might be broadly exercised in the name of "15-minute cities," such as are already being implemented in Denmark and the Netherlands.
Green Fascism: A New Form of Oppression?
All these changes raise worries that they can pave the way for the emergence of a system which can be called "green fascism." Governments could start exerting rigid control over people's lives under the pretext of protecting the environment, introducing additional forms of taxing and shrinking freedom. Such steps could bring the world to the point where air or water, as natural resources free so far, would become taxed and controlled articles.
The visions of the future by CBDCs and carbon credit markets should concern us much. Are we giving up our freedoms and privacy to gain environmental protection? What will be the long-term repercussions when we introduce CBDCs and "climate wallets"? Can this carbon credit market really save our planet or is it just another tool for gaining personal financial enrichment? Questions remain to be opened and deepened in scientific research and public debate. Society should understand the possible benefits and threats related to introducing new technologies and financial systems to make balanced decisions about its future.
Clarification of Points
Sources: