The New Enterprise Performance KPI: Time To Decision
Economic, social, and political uncertainty.?
This is the very real business context for 2023.?
What do you, as a business leader, need to be focused on to ensure that your organization is able to overcome these obstacles and achieve your growth and profitability goals for the year?
A preponderance of research (and real-world experience) suggests you should be paying attention to a very telling but under-the-radar KPI: Time-To-Decision.?
WHY SPEED?
Let’s start with McKinsey, who has spent a good amount of time on the connection between decision making and company performance. To lay the foundation, McKinsey recognizes that not all business decisions are the same. In fact, they use an "ABCD" framework to differentiate decisions and the different approaches required for each:
Ad-hoc - infrequent, low risk, unanticipated decisions
Big Bet - infrequent, high-risk decisions that have the potential to shape the future of an organization
Cross Cutting - more frequent, high risk decisions made by a series of small, interconnected decisions made by different groups as part of a collaborative, end-to-end decision process
Delegated - frequent, lower risk decisions that can be pushed down in the organization.?
Yet despite the differences across these groups, the return on each type of decision largely depends on the same metric: SPEED.?
To this point, a recent McKinsey global survey sought to compare and contrast top-rated decision-making organizations versus everybody else. The answer they found was simple and straightforward: the best organizations make good decisions fast and execute them quickly. And the organizations that did so were 2X more likely to report superior returns on decisions and posted higher overall company growth rates.
In case you’re skeptical of McKinsey’s findings, know that strategic management research has been confirming the connection between decision speed and company performance since 1988.
For example, in one of the first studies of its kind, researcher Kathleen Eisenhardt (now at the Stanford Technology Ventures Program) examined a group of 19 firms concluding that the faster the decision speed, the greater the sales and profitability.?
This connection has since been reinforced by researchers like J Robert Baum and Stefan Wally who conducted a 4-year longitudinal study across 318 companies in 10 different industries and identified that strategic decision making speed predicts the firm’s subsequent growth and profitability.
THE CONNECTION
But why is there such connection between speed and overall company performance??
At executive and cross-cutting levels, uncertainty makes achieving clear direction harder and creates delays and second guessing downstream in execution. At the edges, a similar lack of clarity slows critical response time, frustrating customers and limiting your ability to nimbly capture opportunities as they arise.
All of this friction is the exact opposite of the kind of focus needed to achieve overall company results - especially in dynamic environments like 2023.
The conclusion? To succeed now, you can't just make good decisions, you need to make them fast.
For example, Dave Girouard is a current startup founder (Upstart ) and former president of Google Enterprise, learning much of his decision making approach from people such as Eric Schmidt and Larry Page. Girouard says today, he’s building a culture at Upstart “deeply driven by the belief that fast decisions are far better than slow ones and radically better than no decisions.”
GET FASTER
Ok, so if decision speed is so connected to company overall performance inclusive of sales, growth, and profitability - how do we manage it?
At HiveWise, our core focus is improving both strategic and operational decision making. We have benchmarked increases in decision making speed with our clients as much as 85%. Based on our experience, there are a range of proven approaches to managing and optimizing decision velocity.?
1. Create A “Decisions That Matter” Inventory - One of the first steps to managing decision speed is to get your arms around the full scope of the decisions you face. Work together to identify the strategies, problem-solving, prioritizations, new policies, and fast responses that will be required of your team in the foreseeable next quarter and beyond.?
2. Prioritize & Delegate - It's then important to prioritize this inventory across multiple criteria to ensure the right people are focusing on the right things at the right time. A key part of this step is deciding to delegate as much as possible out to the edges of the organization to ensure enough time and resources are available to address high-risk / high impact decisions. Note: the next section (formalized decision process) is equally important to delegated decisions since much of that process will take place with less direct executive involvement/ oversight.?
3. Formalize Decision Process (Every Time) - Formalized decision processes don’t only outperform informal “make it up as you go” approaches, they also keep teams focused, encourage trust, and reduce Time-To-Decision. This includes.?
4. Single System of Record - We can’t manage what we can’t see… and it’s impossible to “see” decision making if these processes aren’t managed in a central place. Decision making is one of the last critical business processes that have no system of record. In fact, managing decisions today is equivalent to managing sales pre-CRM… we basically just check in with people and ask them how they are doing. This isn’t sustainable, and a decision system of record is quickly becoming core business infrastructure.?
Centralizing key decision data such as the people involved, process steps taken, data used, and calendar days spent can not only increase governance, but will create an entirely new form of intellectual property. The ability to centrally reference past decision cycles will enable your team to develop, improve, and share best-practices. You will be able to start setting goals for Time-To-Decision metrics for different types of decisions, making sure that resources and time spent align with the associated value and speed requirements of the business. ?
THE BOTTOM LINE
If you only take one thing away from this article, I hope it’s this: one of the most important things to increasing speed and outcomes of decisions (large and small) is to start by deciding how to decide first.?
Dave Girouard puts it this way, “if, by way of habit, you consistently begin every decision-making process by considering how much time and effort that decision is worth, who needs to have input, and when you’ll have an answer, you'll have developed the first important muscle for speed.”
I encourage you to adopt as many of the above approaches as you can and see how it impacts your ability to move faster as a team. Take initial steps, measure the results, and scale the success until it becomes the new normal at your organization.?
By the way, if you take a SECOND thing away from this article, I hope it’s this:?HiveWise is the software platform designed to make everything we just talked about easier. Not only to enable your organization to speed up individual decision making (and execution) - but all the decisions that matter.?
It won’t be enough to ensure one or two decisions are fast, explainable, and broadly supported. We need to turn this into the standard operating procedure for how your organization works. That’s how you turn big audacious enterprise goals into achievable reality - even in a crazy time like this. And this is why Time-To-Decision isn’t just an important metric for individual decisions or managers, it’s an important enterprise performance metric - one that is tightly tied to your organization's performance across sales, growth and profitability.?
The time to get faster is now. Let's go.
Innovation, Transformation & Change | Board Director | Investor | Advisor
1 年This resonates on so many levels! For many organisations, the way they make decisions is heavily reactive, and the implications should be laid out upfront. This often translates to a steep learning curve that has massive cost implications. A structured approach to decision-making based on the type of decision (the ABCD framework is great!) can mitigate the inefficiencies and the ineffectiveness - time and money are always vital indicators of ROI.
Innovation Leader at the Intersection of Health, Wellness + Performance | Founder & CEO | Doctoral Candidate Studying Stress
1 年This makes total sense, Mark. From my purview I don't see that companies have an answer to distributed decision making which is now the norm with hybrid. I always think from the perspective of "what product are you replacing." And with this lens on there's a clear need. Chat channels like Slack have become de facto decision making tools as well as decks, docs, etc. with comments embedded, exec meetings, etc. but these are very noisy and inefficient (and ultimately analog!) processes. And the output often gets overridden by the HiPPO anyway. Organizational waste and inefficiency. I see this as a hygiene habit to start where companies can first quantify the speed to decision, then work towards effectiveness of decision then ultimately go towards an OODA loop model or something akin to what Bridgewater does to codify and learn from organizational knowledge as decision heuristics / models.
CEO 5.0 - Regen Ecosystems Pioneer - CSR booster - Frugal Innovation Impact maker - B Leader Affiliated - Circulab? transformer - New Mobility designer - Green IT expert - CEC CoFa
1 年Hi Mark, Many thanks for this post which is clearly explaining this new and dangerous KPI. This KPI booster in the classic business will probably help to dominate such as the trading robots and the planet boundaries will follow this hyperbolic process and some big collapse issues ... There is no planet B.
Global Broadcast Director (Digital, Media, Insights) at Boucheron
1 年Great post Mark. Building on "clarifying the objective", hand-in-hand with that is having a clear shared vision and strategy that provides the mental framework for faster and better decision making. Convoluted and wavering decision making arrives when stakeholders are not sufficiently empowered or informed. One thing I always go back to is the slogan on the wall of Facebook's first office: 'done is better than perfect' which holds true when 'done' doesn't mean 'we kicked the can a little further down the road' but instead means 'we are all clear on the direction and velocity that we're kicking this can'?