A "NEW ENLIGHTENMENT" IS NEEDED TO TRANSCEND OUR EXISTENTIAL CRISIS

A "NEW ENLIGHTENMENT" IS NEEDED TO TRANSCEND OUR EXISTENTIAL CRISIS

When I established the Enlightened Enterprise Academy just after the start of the COVID pandemic in 2020, I had a clear reason for doing so. I realised the pandemic was going to be a global health crisis, and that it was likely to trigger a global economic crisis. And, unlike the ‘Global Banking Crisis’ 2007/8, “global” would mean global this time around.

At that time I reflected on the fact that as a society, and as organisations, the crises seemed to be increasing in frequency, scale, and impact. More importantly we seem incapable of learning much from them. But a small percentage of leaders are undaunted. They know how to respond, and do learn the lessons.

As we went into the first COVID lockdown in the UK we had just run a conference on that very topic, “Undaunted: How Successful Leaders Face Up to Wicked Problems and Avoid Predictable Surprises.” It was based on extensive research and case studies and included an international speaker line-up.

Martin Reeves

Successful leaders even manage to gain advantage in adversity. About a year before the pandemic I saw Martin Reeves , Chair of the Boston Consulting Group's BCG Henderson Institute, present research indicating that in the previous three larger economic downturns around 14% of companies managed to thrive in adversity, and he explained why, based on this article .

There are no prizes for guessing the reasons, the main one being they are prepared. But critically, “They are prepared for the next downturn, not the past one.” The business context is ever changing and the companies that thrive are constantly adapting their strategies as the context changes. They know how to adapt and are designed to be adaptive.

Over time I have come to realise that what is true for business is also true for any organisation, individual, or society. Few are able to adapt in the face of adversity, but a small percentage are. But, why are so many of us unable to adapt?

The primary reason we are unable to adapt is our inability unwillingness to challenge and change our understanding about the way the world works, especially if the change needed is transformational rather than incremental. For most of us it takes a crisis to force us to embrace transformational change. In normal times we are more likely to resist it.

A few years ago I learned that this idea is recognised in a concept called “The Overton Window.” Named after an American policy analyst Joseph Overton. It says the general population will be more open to accepting radical political ideas and policies when faced with a crisis. I think this explains what people today are willing to entertain the radical ideas of the populists on the far right and far left of politics in so many counties today. The populists are still minorities, but growing minorities. Still, the majority resists transformational change.

I'm with those who believe we need transformational change, but not the change being offered by the populists who offer false promises and will make matters far worse.

Transformational change is needed if we are to reduce the frequency and scale of the crises we have been seeing, and if we are to stand any chance of transcending the highly complex challenges we face in the twenty first century. But the change has to start with each and every one of us recognising why we think the world works the way it does, where those ideas came from, and why they are often wrong or, at best, not very useful today.

The way we see the world today is largely based on the ideas of the first Enlightenment which began three centuries ago. Since then the world is transformed but our thinking has only evolved incrementally. We now need to embrace transformational changes.

To give one example, the Enlightenment thinkers believed we could control nature and our natural environment. And they paid little attention to the exploitation of natural resources since they were abundant at the time. There thinking has determined our relationship with our natural environment, causing the greatest challenge we face. If we are unwilling to transform that thinking our survival is at risk and our quality of life will be significantly damaged.

These days we are faced with many significant crises, referred to as the "Polycrisis", "Permacrisis" or "Metacrisis". They are each large scale, highly complex, systemic risks. Collectively they represent an existential risk to humanity – to whether we continue to existence, and to how we experience our existence. For this reason I prefer to speak of the "Existential Crisis", rather than use the other new terms which, whilst valuable, offer only partial understandings of the greater problem.

Earlier I said the majority of us are only willing to embrace transformational change when forced to do so by a crisis, but even faced with a crisis some choose to be Wilfully Blind, to adopt the stance of denial. They usually do so out of fear. They fear the uncertainty that is often a feature of transformational change. But there are ways to address that, and we must address it.

We must address it because the crises we must transcend threaten our existence and that of future generations, or the quality of our existence and that of future generations.

Many of today's biggest challenges were not challenges during the first Enlightenment. So when it comes to addressing them, their thinking leaves us in the dark. A "New Enlightenment" is essential if we are to address the 21st century challenges. We must be willing to challenge the way we understand the world.

These arguments are central to the way the Enlightened Enterprise Academy thinks and what it does. And a core element of what it does is to run the Salon, bringing together the leading thinkers of our day from a very broad range of disciplines, to explore the challenges of our time. This approach is inspired by the Paris salons of the 18th century that were the catalyst for the first Enlightenment. We wish to be a catalyst for the New Enlightenment.

A Paris Salon of the 18th Century

We believe there to be individuals at every level in every business, organisation or institution who recognise “the system isn’t working,” that many ideas are outdated, and that transformational change is needed. And there are a limited number of organisations that do.

We believe many of these people and organisations wish to help drive the change. They will be the pioneers of the New Enlightenment and we wish to establish a global community that supports them. Are you one of them? Do you want to join us?

You can join the Enlightened Enterprise Academy and the Salon today . The salon programme begins in June and will include exclusive interviews with some of the world’s leading thinkers. It will also include bi-weekly live online dialogues in which you can take part. In addition we offer programmes and are developing other products and services to support the network.

Warren Beardall????

Revealing risk in the space between them and us | Consultant | PhD researcher | Collaborator

7 个月

Gosh, I had not seen any of this before. So much my cup of tea ??. I’m afraid my current research keeps me from jumping into this immediately but it’s certainly aligned with my thinking. Especially the challenging the “inability”, and “unwillingness” to just peel back more foundationally some core assumptions and “change our understanding”. My approach to that is philosophically hermeneutic and phenomenological to help see that bias from all sides. Light shone upon what enlightenment actually cast into shadow… My PhD research is specifically focused on this necessary perspective changing capability. I am framing the productive possibilities of conflict as a means to reveal different intentions of interests, when necessarily being brought together to get big stuff done. This is my mode of focus, directed at our governance assumptions in inter-organisational projects. That might offer some colour to other discussions we are both privy to. I am not focused on institutional governance per se, but more the conflicting perspectives such governance and wider interests need to be aware of and sympathetic to. It is in that sense that conflict brings to the foreground different intentions some introduce into actions (aware of it, or not…)

Spiro Haxhi

Author : 1"Quality quantification theory" (2010) 2."Quality and General Welfare Codification" (2014) 3. Promote the General Welfare Political Economic System (2019) 4. Change Governing System (2023)

7 个月

Growing value-GDP business decision making is false strategy and the root cause of "Poliycrisis." Shifting to promoting wellness-GWF(General Welfare) governing strategy is the only simple solution of all problems and Policrisis. Let's work together to make this paradime shift reality to save humanity and regenerate the natyre.

Elliot S. Schreiber, Ph.D.

Top 50 Governance Professional (NACD 2023 Director 100 Awards); Top 50 Global Thought Leader and Influencer on Risk Management 2023 & 2024 (Thinkers360). Helping boards move from compliance to value-creation.

7 个月

Paul Barnett Great post! I hope this helps to cast a wide network to attract others who see the need for the same.

Rob Karpati

The Blended Capital Group - ESG, Governance, Strategy and Finance Integration Leadership Focused on Impact Delivery

7 个月

Fantastic and important. Risks don't go away when they are ignored. Risks fester, becoming crises. Our polycrisis is a set of intersected cross-fertilizing issues, reflecting the fact that we have ignored risks for far too long as they fester. What are the assumptions we have on how 'things' work, on how our system operates? We are all capitalists, but there is a huge difference between the assumptions, approaches and resultant outcomes of extractive and regenerative capitalism. We have seen where an extractive approach takes us - today's polycrisis. Challenging the thinking and shifting toward refreshed paradigms is essential for our collective future. The Enlightened Enterprise Academy will play an important role in helping to catalyze thinking, and the Salon approach that you have written about is spot-on for helping work through the thinking that is necessary.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Paul Barnett的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了