The New Competitive Bangladesh Garment Industry

The New Competitive Bangladesh Garment Industry

In 1995, the major garment importing countries agreed to dissolve the MultiFibre Arrangement and thus phase out global garment export quotas.  They recognized that the move to unrestricted garment imports would cause serious disruption to local garment producing industries in industrialized countries that had been protected for generations.  They also recognized that the quota regime had created national garment exporting industries, which had no competitive advantages other than the fact that they were quota free.  As a result, it was decided to phase-out quotas over a ten-year period, to allow both sides to adjust to the new open markets.  In the event, while some on each side made efforts to reinvent themselves most did nothing, and paid the price.

Bangladesh is about to undergo the same wrenching experience.  As of 2024, they will lose duty-free access to the EU, which they currently enjoy as a least developed country.  At that point, they will be forced to compete on an equal basis with better developed, more efficient factories able to provide their customers with something more than no-longer-cheap commodity garments.

Bangladesh is currently the world’s 2nd largest garment exporter after China.  However, unless the industry takes action, Bangladesh might well become the world’s #1 most replaceable garment supplier.   

In 2024, Bangladesh’s garment industry will be squeezed on three sides.

  1.  Within Bangladesh, the foreign-owned factories have all the advantages over the locals. They can survive and prosper in the new more competitive industry.
  • They have global reputations for corporate social responsibility;
  • They are willing and able to pay higher wages; which allows them to train workers;
  • They are able to provide their customers with all required services from their home factories, leaving their Bangladesh branch operations as simply low-cost subcontractors.    

2.   Outside Bangladesh, new industries are in the early stage of development, with the potential to provide the same basic commodities at FOB prices lower than Bangladesh and duty free to both the EU and the U.S. Currently, Sub-Saharan African factories collectively have a world market-share of 0.08%, but major importers and their Asian factory suppliers are making major investments in those nascent industries. Five years from now, Bangladesh will not be able to compete with these newcomers. 

3.   Reshoring is the future.  Five years from now technology will have moved import customers back to their home countries or regional blocs.

Bangladesh’s garment industry leaders must act now to develop a new industry able to compete in the normal export industry where importers pay duty.  

Industry leaders and the BGMEA must put aside their differences to first define and then create the new Bangladesh industry.

At a minimum, it must have three facets.

  1. New systems to increase productivity.
  2. Trained multitasked workers capable of fast turn and quick response.
  3. Educated managers and technicians capable of providing the complex and sophisticated services that customer demand.

Five years is a very short period of time to achieve any realistic goal.

The first step is for industry leaders to wake up and recognize they have no choice but to put aside their differences and collaborate.  To quote an American WE MUST INDEED ALL HANG TOGETHER OR ASSUREDLY WE WILL ALL HANG SEPARATELY.  

Jawaid kidwai

Founder CEO at One-Stop Consultancy

5 年

For Bangladesh Textile and Garment industry ... Rather for Bangladesh this reality is a challenge to be taken most seriously by all stake holders. As one most important area missed in all discussions is the fact that approx a population of 3.6 million comprises of workforce in Garment / Textile industry out of which about 80% being female. Now, governmental / private and public forums seen in the last half decade have been on defencive footing fire fighting for critical area's corrective actions which in the first place should have put in place at the inception of coming boom in the 90's (effective legislated / implemented disciplines for establishing and running of the industry). When (generally speaking) hap-hazard shed based Garment industry started mushrooming all over. MOST LESSON TAKING EXERCISE IS SRILANKA GARMENT / TEXTILE INDUSTRY ... from non existant in end 70's to growth in 80's (very disciplined / structured) sudden loss with GSP and moving out of volume for China cheap manufacturing ... Total restructure of industry model (worked by Govt / stake holder's partnership) and a High end Value added Quality based industry survives.

回复
David Birnbaum

Strategic Planner for the Global Garment Export Industry

5 年

Dear Ayub: I do not this? is a question of winning.? Success depends on satisfying the needs of your customer the needs of your customers' customers --- the consumer.? You do not want to fight therm but rather support them

Ayub Hossain

Chief Commercial Officer ( CCO) and Supply Chain Management at an 100% Export Oriented Garments Industry.

5 年

Rightly said sir. We have to win any how.

David Birnbaum

Strategic Planner for the Global Garment Export Industry

5 年

The large number of comments together with the quality of those comments is indicative to the professional skills of the commentators.? This allows us to look more deeply at the issues facing Bangladesh.? For examples, many write of the improved education, which has brought management to a far higher level. At the same time many write of the low level of productivity that still plagues not just the industry, but the country as a whole How do we reconcile the two seemingly mutually exclusive conclusions?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David Birnbaum的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了