Will the new competency framework encourage an industry exodus?
https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-competence-concept-ability-individual-to-do-job-properly-chart-icons-keywords-image40016640

Will the new competency framework encourage an industry exodus?


The new draft competency framework from the Building Safety Regulator has been sent out to industry for feedback with the closing date being tomorrow (December 9th). It makes for challenging reading at times as requirements are often confusing and out of sync in the document that has been provided by HSE. However, once the information is digested we can see a potential issue that could mean a considerable challenge for the building control sector.

Within the framework it sets out the competencies required for surveyors, complex surveyors and managers. The level of competency for managers is, in some areas, lower than that required from complex surveyors (who need level 4 across the board). Whilst this is not unusual in our industry (a manager can be responsible for a team of inspectors who are more qualified in complex projects), it could see a situation where an existing manager is required to upskill in order to continue to do the oversight role that they are currently carrying out.

Our industry is already facing an alarming skills shortage and the average age of a building control surveyor is increasing. This already puts a huge strain on the sector through natural losses due to retirements. The draft framework could create the perfect storm for many of those who are already considering a move away from the sector either into a different job or into early retirement. For managers who find themselves in a position of needing to upskill to continue in their role there are really only three choices: do the necessary training to continue working, change their role to that of a basic surveyor and continue to work or leave the profession. Even worse they could stifle progression in their teams as a way of avoiding their own additional competence assessments.

Whilst the BSR is right to be focused on levelling the playing field as far as competency is concerned, we could find ourselves heamorrhaging talent due to the new, and sometimes difficult to interpret, requirements of the framework. At a time where the industry is already struggling to cope with demand and is finding attracting new talent challenging, are we creating a bigger problem with pathways which are two tiered?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Miles的更多文章

  • The new Building Safety Act and its implications for approved inspectors

    The new Building Safety Act and its implications for approved inspectors

    In my post last week I referenced an event where for the first time in the history of Approved Inspectors, over 120…

    3 条评论
  • An answer to the 5 questions LABC have for MHCLG.

    An answer to the 5 questions LABC have for MHCLG.

    LABC have asked five consequences and questions that MHCLG now need to answer, most of which revolve around the…

    1 条评论
  • The failure in implementing 100% Hackitt

    The failure in implementing 100% Hackitt

    I’m going to go against convention here with this post. It’s a personal view as a building control professional of 17…

    2 条评论
  • New Approved Document R

    New Approved Document R

    New Approved Document R comes into effect Approved Document R – Physical infrastructure for high-speed electronic…

  • Exciting New Appointments

    Exciting New Appointments

    Despite the uncertainty surrounding 'Brexit' July has started well for Butler and Young in Leeds and Manchester We have…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了