Will the new competency framework encourage an industry exodus?
John Miles
Transforming Society Together - Class 3G/H RBI - Operations Director - Leeds - 07795 356082
The new draft competency framework from the Building Safety Regulator has been sent out to industry for feedback with the closing date being tomorrow (December 9th). It makes for challenging reading at times as requirements are often confusing and out of sync in the document that has been provided by HSE. However, once the information is digested we can see a potential issue that could mean a considerable challenge for the building control sector.
Within the framework it sets out the competencies required for surveyors, complex surveyors and managers. The level of competency for managers is, in some areas, lower than that required from complex surveyors (who need level 4 across the board). Whilst this is not unusual in our industry (a manager can be responsible for a team of inspectors who are more qualified in complex projects), it could see a situation where an existing manager is required to upskill in order to continue to do the oversight role that they are currently carrying out.
领英推荐
Our industry is already facing an alarming skills shortage and the average age of a building control surveyor is increasing. This already puts a huge strain on the sector through natural losses due to retirements. The draft framework could create the perfect storm for many of those who are already considering a move away from the sector either into a different job or into early retirement. For managers who find themselves in a position of needing to upskill to continue in their role there are really only three choices: do the necessary training to continue working, change their role to that of a basic surveyor and continue to work or leave the profession. Even worse they could stifle progression in their teams as a way of avoiding their own additional competence assessments.
Whilst the BSR is right to be focused on levelling the playing field as far as competency is concerned, we could find ourselves heamorrhaging talent due to the new, and sometimes difficult to interpret, requirements of the framework. At a time where the industry is already struggling to cope with demand and is finding attracting new talent challenging, are we creating a bigger problem with pathways which are two tiered?