A new approach to Project Information Requirements?

Project Information Requirements can be hit and miss! On many of the projects I have advised and assisted over the years, they are happily forgotten or merged into the asset or engineering worlds. Their importance and specifically their importance to the people who finance and own the project is not communicated, yet this is where we can win a significant battle into getting investment in digital delivery!

That top level, the financial backers, the shareholders, the board, the investors and their customers want to know that the project is in good hands, is not wasting money, taking unnecessary risks and will finish when they promised. Much of this information is generated somewhere already, but not communicated until its perhaps too late and not in a way where it can be linked to other project data that will will allow for analysis for red flags and triggers, so we can predict and avoid, rather than impact and react!

Project Information Requirements (PIR)

This document (or database) is written to ensure that information essential for the running of the project and the meeting of its objectives are measured and monitored at a regular battle rhythm throughout its lifecycle. This ensures that there are no surprises in 6 months’ time when it is noted that the project won’t achieve the outcomes set by the client and needs to be relevant throughout all the phases of the project.

The method used should give the appointed party the opportunity to deliver their best and most innovative ways of recording, managing, and communicating this information. (Outcomes rather than restrictive details)

Ideally, it should be split into three tables:

Project Management: Standard project management information to look at metrics such as finance, risk, quality, safety, legality, and stakeholder engagement.

example:

This project needs to have a set of stakeholder engagement procedures that ensure that project information is communicated to relevant stakeholders in a timely and appropriate manner.

What are the stakeholder engagement procedures and technologies you will employ and how will a register of these engagements be communicated to the XXX project team to allow monitoring on an XXX basis?

Design Intent: This asks them how they will communicate how they are going to meet the key project metrics, such as improved connectivity, increased capacity, sustainability, economic boost and improved journey times etc.

One of the most important project factors to measure is the reduction in travel time between the towns and cities that are connected by the new railway. This could be achieved by comparing the average travel time before and after this project. How might you measure, monitor and communicate this, and what technologies will you use?

High level specification: these are specific metrics required by the high-level sponsor (such as the Department for Transport), such as provision for persons of restricted mobility, rolling stock provision, integration with other owners assets, biodiversity and carbon footprint etc.

Persons of Restricted Mobility (PRM): This new railway shall be compliant with the PRM and Persons of Restricted Mobility Technical Specification for Interoperability (PRM-TSI) covering accessibility for persons with reduced mobility and the UK National Implementation plan. How will you ensure that the railway complies with the accessibility requirements for persons with restricted mobility, as outlined in the PRSI and PRM-TSI, and communicate this compliance to the appointing party?

In each case, the appointed party should ideally respond with the When (they will deliver including frequency of updates) What (what information they will deliver and the format it will be in) How (How will the information be quality assured, so it can be trusted throughout including sign off procedures) How (How will it be submitted or communicated to the appointing party)

This outcome driven approach might upset some consultants who are used to dictating what the client sees or has access to, (and charging accordingly..) but this is about value, value of information, winning that high level battle that allows the CEO's, shareholders, board members and ultimately the customers to see what they could win, if they take the information delivery seriously.