Never Do Another RFI or RFP!

Never Do Another RFI or RFP!

Stakeholder engagement is critical to our success. Unfortunately, the fastest way to scare away a stakeholder is to suggest doing an RFx. To people outside of procurement, nothing screams “delays and loss of control” more loudly than those three letters. 

Instead of an RFx, do a thorough review of the supplier landscape. Leverage your professional network and third-party market information services to identify a diverse list of suppliers worth considering.   

Have a friendly conversation with your stakeholder(s) about they what they are looking for from a product or supplier, and what they want to avoid. Take that input and solicit the relevant information from that list of suppliers you put together.

Consolidate and summarize their responses. Share that information with your stakeholders, get their feedback, and suggest further conversations with a small number of those suppliers who seem most worthwhile.

Have those conversations, facilitate a guided discussion with your stakeholders about what they liked and didn't like, and help them weigh the relative importance of those things they liked and disliked. Take all that and come to a consensus on what to do next.

That may sound exactly like an RFI/RFP, but it’s only an RFI/RFP if you call it one. Instead, it is a series of highly valuable consultative actions taken on behalf of your stakeholders, with minimum effort on their part, and zero perception that Procurement is slowing them down, or telling them what to buy or who to buy it from.

Note of caution: Whatever you do, however you package it for your stakeholders, make sure your suppliers understand that they are participating in a formal competitive engagement. They overwhelmingly tend to behave better that way.

One more note, for the Lawyers and Internal Audit Guys: I know; in government, or regulated industries, or places with hyper-specific SOX compliance rules, you have to do formal RFPs and call them that. In those places, stakeholders have no choice, Procurement has a mandate, and all this is somewhat moot. Still, the point holds; make the process as painless and transparent as possible, and everyone will be happier.


要查看或添加评论,请登录

Matt Anders的更多文章

  • Your Way Is Not The Right Way

    Your Way Is Not The Right Way

    Do you think you’ve figured out the right way to report savings, the right way to run an RFP, the right way to engage…

    4 条评论
  • What Skills Are You Missing?

    What Skills Are You Missing?

    How big is the skills gap for you and your Procurement team? Part 2 of 3 Much is written about the inventory of skills…

    2 条评论
  • What you are missing?

    What you are missing?

    How big is the skills gap for you and your Procurement team? Much is written about the inventory of skills needed to…

    17 条评论
  • What is “Force Majeure,” and what do Procurement professionals need to know about it right now?

    What is “Force Majeure,” and what do Procurement professionals need to know about it right now?

    I can’t count the number of times I’ve heard colleagues talk about contracts in terms of the “business parts” and the…

  • The ONE QUESTION Procurement Pros Need to Answer Every Day

    The ONE QUESTION Procurement Pros Need to Answer Every Day

    It seems that everyone thinks they can do what we do. Every executive considers themselves a master negotiator.

    1 条评论
  • It's Time You Broke Some Procurement Rules

    It's Time You Broke Some Procurement Rules

    My of my favorite bosses once told me “if you’re not breaking the rules at least once a week, you’re not doing your…

    3 条评论
  • You Are No Good at Cold Calls

    You Are No Good at Cold Calls

    For all the value LinkedIn delivers, it comes with a painful downside for many of us; excess contact with sales people.…

    46 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了