Negotiation Styles: Collaborative vs. Adversarial - Which is Right for You?

Our personal and professional life both require the ability to negotiate. How you approach negotiations can have a big impact on the results, whether you're finalising a contract with a business partner, negotiating a pay rise, or settling a dispute with a coworker. The two main approaches to negotiations, collaborative and adversarial, contrast one another and each has advantages and disadvantages of its own. In order to assist you in choosing which negotiation approach is best for you and the particular circumstances you face, we will examine these two approaches in-depth in this post.

Understanding Collaborative Negotiation

Collaborative negotiation, also known as integrative or win-win negotiation, is a type of negotiation that emphasises cooperation, mutual gain, and issue solutions. Consider the following hypothetical situation to demonstrate this:

Assume you're a project manager negotiating a vital component of your project with a vendor. You would participate in an open dialogue with the vendor during a collaborative negotiation, sharing information about your project's long-term goals and obstacles. The goal is to discover a solution that not only benefits your organisation but also allows the vendor to expand. Working collaboratively may lead to the identification of cost-cutting techniques or inventive innovations that will make the project more successful for both sides.

Key Features of Collaborative Negotiation:

1. Cooperation: Collaborative negotiators think that collaboration can produce greater results than competition. They place a premium on developing relationships and trust with the other side.
2. Open Communication: Transparency and open conversation are essential components of collaborative negotiations. Both parties openly share facts and concerns in order to better comprehend each other's points of view.
3. Win-Win Solutions: The purpose of collaborative negotiation is to create solutions that benefit both parties. Negotiators aim to increase the size of the pie, ensuring that both parties walk away with something.
4. Long-Term Focus: Long-term relationships are frequently the focus of collaborative negotiations. Parties recognise that future encounters may be required and strive to retain goodwill.

Pros of Collaborative Negotiation:

• Relationship Building: Collaborative negotiation fosters positive relationships, which can lead to future opportunities and cooperation.
• Mutual Satisfaction: Both parties typically leave the negotiation feeling satisfied with the outcome, reducing the risk of future disputes.
• Creative Problem Solving: Collaborative negotiators often find innovative solutions that may not be apparent in adversarial negotiations.

Understanding Adversarial Negotiation

Competition, positional bargaining, and an emphasis on individual gains characterise adversarial negotiation, also known as distributive or win-lose negotiation. Consider the following scenario to demonstrate this style:

You are negotiating the price of a classic car with a collector. In an antagonistic negotiation, both you and the collector may take strong views in order to obtain a pricing advantage. Each of you may employ methods to obtain a reduced (you) or higher (the collector) price. The negotiation turns into a game of who can extract the most value.

Key Features of Adversarial Negotiation:

1. Competition: Negotiations are viewed by adversarial negotiators as a competition to win at the expense of the opposing party. They frequently use strategies to obtain an advantage.
2. Positional Bargaining: In adversarial negotiations, the emphasis is frequently on stances rather than underlying interests. Each side adopts a determined stance and attempts to extract concessions from the other.
3. Limited Information Sharing: In hostile discussions, parties may hide information or deliberately exploit it to gain influence.
4. Short-Term Focus: Adversarial bargaining prioritises short-term advantages over long-term connections. This might result in strained relationships and mistrust.

Pros of Adversarial Negotiation:

• Potential for Greater Individual Gains: In some situations, an adversarial approach can lead to securing better individual outcomes.
• Clear Boundaries: Adversarial negotiations can establish clear boundaries and protect against exploitation.
• Efficiency: Adversarial negotiations may be quicker and more straightforward in certain scenarios.

Which Is Right for You?

The choice between collaborative and adversarial negotiation styles depends on various factors:

1. Nature of the Relationship: Consider whether the negotiation is a one-time interaction or part of an ongoing relationship. Collaborative negotiation is often better for maintaining positive relationships.Example: You are negotiating with a potential client for a one-time marketing campaign. In this case, since the relationship is transactional and not expected to continue beyond the campaign, an adversarial negotiation focused on securing the best deal for your agency may be more appropriate.
2. Complexity of the Issue: Collaborative negotiation is preferable for complex, multi-faceted issues that require creative solutions. Adversarial negotiation may work for simpler, transactional matters.Example: You are negotiating the terms of a merger between two technology companies, involving intellectual property, employee transitions, and market strategy alignment. Given the complexity and multi-faceted nature of this negotiation, a collaborative approach that seeks creative solutions to address all aspects of the merger is likely to be more effective.
3. Importance of Long-Term Outcomes: If you're focused on building trust and long-term partnerships, collaborative negotiation is likely the better choice.Example: You are negotiating with a strategic supplier who provides essential components for your manufacturing process. Building a long-term partnership with this supplier is crucial for ensuring a stable supply chain. In this case, a collaborative negotiation approach focused on mutual growth and trust is the better choice to ensure the supplier remains reliable and supportive in the long run.
4. Power Dynamics: Assess the power balance between the parties. In situations where one party holds significantly more power, adversarial tactics may be less effective.Example: You are a startup entrepreneur negotiating with a large, established corporation to license your innovative technology. In this situation, the power dynamic is heavily skewed in favor of the large corporation. Attempting an adversarial negotiation may lead to unfavorable terms or even deter the corporation from considering your technology. Collaborative negotiation, emphasizing the potential benefits for both parties and the opportunity for the corporation to stay ahead of competitors, may yield better results.

In the world of negotiation, there's no one-size-fits-all approach. The choice between collaborative and adversarial negotiation styles hinges on your specific circumstances and objectives. Both styles have their merits and drawbacks, and the most successful negotiators often adapt their approach based on the situation. By understanding the nuances of each style, you can become a more versatile and effective negotiator, choosing the approach that's right for you and your goals.

To understand what would be the best approach to a negotiation for you, write to us about your situation at [email protected] and [email protected]. Also, dont forget to follow Apex Hatchers and subscribe to this your letter.