Is the negative stock bond correlation dead?

Is the negative stock bond correlation dead?

Subscribe to My key question this month newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox.

A reliable negative correlation between stocks and core bonds has historically been a central tenet for portfolio construction, allowing investors to sleep easy through the trials and tribulations of the economic cycle.

In simple terms, a decline in economic growth would drag down corporate earnings and stock prices, causing central banks to cut interest rates in order to stimulate future growth, which in turn sends the price of bonds higher. As the economy and stock prices recover, central banks would raise rates, lowering bond prices. The beauty for investors is that if your stocks were doing badly, your core bonds were doing well, and vice-versa.

Over the past 18 months, the theory broke down. Last year the price of stocks and bonds fell in tandem. And this year they have both risen.

The reason behind the breakdown of this blissful synergy? Inflation.

The emergence of inflation means that central banks cannot support growth as their primary focus. In fact, they have to drive a downturn in growth rather than prevent it. Thus causing stocks to fall at the same time as core bonds.

We can see from the chart that the reliable negative correlation between stocks and bonds was only consistently present when central banks had inflation under control.

No alt text provided for this image
Source: BLS, Haver Analytics, Refinitiv Datastream, S&P Global, Shiller, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data as of 31 May 2023.

The question of whether the negative correlation returns therefore depends on the question I have focused on in past blogs. Will inflation quickly recede and not re-emerge in the future?

Regular readers will know that I’m sceptical in this regard. I believe that while headline inflation will fall further in the coming months, it will get sticky as it approaches the region of 3-4%. In the short term, central banks will not be able to cut rates and support growth as quickly as the market currently expects.

I also expect more frequent bouts of cost shocks, much like we experienced last year, in reaction to both more frequent climate events and a rocky transition to renewables as our primary source of energy.

I therefore expect the relationship between stocks and bonds to be less stable than it has been in the past, with periods of negative correlation but also significant periods of positive correlation.

For multi-asset investors, the key implication is that diversification is about more than bonds. Bonds will diversify a portfolio from a deep recession and deflationary shocks but we also need assets that will diversify against inflation shocks. For this we need to look towards alternatives. As we learned last year, assets like timber and core infrastructure provide true diversification against inflation shocks and should come under greater consideration from investors.??

No alt text provided for this image
Source: Bloomberg, Burgiss, Cliffwater, FactSet, HRFI, MSCI, NCREIF, Refinitiv Datastream, S&P Global, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Global government bonds: Bloomberg Global Aggregate – Government; Global inflation-linked: Bloomberg Global Inflation-Linked; Global IG: Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate – Corporate; Global HY: ICE BofA Global High Yield Index; Hedge funds: HRFI Fund Weighted Composite; US core real estate: NCREIF Property Index – Open End Diversified Core Equity; Europe core real estate: MSCI Global Property Fund Index – Continental Europe; Direct lending: Cliffwater Direct Lending Index; Global infrastructure: MSCI Global Quarterly Infrastructure Asset Index (equal-weighted blend); Timber: NCREIF Timberland Total Return Index. Private equity and venture capital are time-weighted returns from Burgiss. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current and future results. Data as of 26 June 2023.

To explore our Guide to the Markets you can click here.


Important information

This communication is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any investment or interest thereto. It should be noted that the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance and yield are not a reliable indicator of current and future results. There is no guarantee that any forecast made will come to pass. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. Our EMEA Privacy Policy is available at www.jpmorgan.com/emea-privacy-policy. This communication is issued in Europe (excluding UK) by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l .and in the UK by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. - 09qy210207162211


Steven Ward

Assistant Vice President, Wealth Management Associate

1 年

Thanks for sharing

善萨伊德Shan Saeed

Chief Economist at Juwai IQI

1 年

We have informed our valued / sophisticated investors last year in June -2022 in our newsletter: bond is the worst asset class to be in the current landscape with rising interest rates. Who made the first call in the market??? Financial Times shared on June 28/2023. Bank of America nurses $100bn paper loss after big bet in bond market - https://www.ft.com/content/df4f343c-5666-43a2-ba01-ef315bfb119a Karen Ward : your question is very pertinent and significant in a time where investors need strategic thinking to manage their portfolios. Good job Karen.

CHESTER SWANSON SR.

Realtor Associate @ Next Trend Realty LLC | HAR REALTOR, IRS Tax Preparer

1 年

Well said.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Karen Ward的更多文章

  • Is 3% the new 2% when it comes to inflation?

    Is 3% the new 2% when it comes to inflation?

    In the UK and US, the disinflationary process looks to have stalled. While headline inflation is still being flattered…

    16 条评论
  • Will tech stocks continue to deliver A*s?

    Will tech stocks continue to deliver A*s?

    There are many important questions to answer as we navigate 2025. While many are spending vast amounts of time…

    4 条评论
  • Should investors re-run the 2016 playbook?

    Should investors re-run the 2016 playbook?

    The re-election of Donald Trump is prompting many investors to dust off the playbook that worked so well during his…

    3 条评论
  • What is needed to revive growth in China?

    What is needed to revive growth in China?

    China has failed to make a meaningful recovery post Covid, continually disappointing forecasts. Markets are looking to…

    2 条评论
  • Should the BoE follow the Fed?

    Should the BoE follow the Fed?

    Subscribe to My key question this month newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox. The Federal Reserve (Fed)…

    10 条评论
  • Is the US headed for recession?

    Is the US headed for recession?

    Subscribe to My key question this month newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox. A recent weak US jobs report…

    13 条评论
  • Will political uncertainty upset the European recovery?

    Will political uncertainty upset the European recovery?

    Subscribe to My key question this month newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox. One of our key convictions at…

    5 条评论
  • Should the Bank of England cut?

    Should the Bank of England cut?

    Subscribe to My key question this month newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox. This week we received yet more…

    4 条评论
  • Where are we in the cycle?

    Where are we in the cycle?

    Subscribe to My key question this month newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox. Tactical asset allocators…

    8 条评论
  • What will happen to stocks if the central banks don’t cut rates?

    What will happen to stocks if the central banks don’t cut rates?

    Subscribe to My key question this month newsletter to receive it directly in your inbox. Stocks and the price of other…

    10 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了