NEAT: to Lose Weight without Exercise
?? Ryan Blackburn
"Ryan is a life changer" - ex-client, Roy (SME Founder + CEO) ?????????? | Men's High-Performance Coach for time challenged business men.
? [Enjoy this with more free benefits, in The Inspired Leaders Community ]
Have you ever tried to lose weight by cleaning up your diet and going full on at it with exercise… whether that was via a gym, running, or another activity?
Only to then find yourself annoyingly back at square one months [if not weeks] later?
It feels frustrating and defeating, right? Or maybe not… maybe you just side line it and forget about it.
Either way, the initial fire that was ignited and the hard work you put in goes to waste.
But, here's something you'll be pleased to hear:
You've been going about it all wrong.?
You don't need a gym or exercise to lose your 'tum-tum' [or whatever name floats your boat].
Here's why:
Heavy dependancy on the role of exercise to lose lbs is not an efficient or optimal approach to weight 'loss'.?
That said, don't discard exercise just yet… I'll explain why soon.
Firstly, just look at the maths! I'll let you decide how you'd rather spend your energy losing weight.
? In a nut shell, the below image shows how calories are burned and in what proportion of total daily energy.
TDEE - Total Daily Energy Expenditure
EAT - *Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
TEF - Thermic Effect of Food
NEAT - Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis
BMR - Basal Metabolic Rate
**REE - Resting Energy Expenditure
NREE… take a wild guess [Clue: look at NEAT]
(**REE cannot be easily or acutely impacted, and is almost entirely not in your control which leaves you with only ~30% of TDEE that can be impacted.)
As you can see, exercise isn't exactly a big player in calorie burn.?
And now look at it from a time perspective:
1 week = 168 hours.
So 5 hours of exercise = 2.98% of 1 week (time wise)
Or, 3 hours of exercise =?1.79% of 1 week (time wise)
Now, if you're time challenged because of work, 5 hours might be a luxury, right??
And that 2.98% window of time in your week will impact ~5% of your total daily energy burn. Proportionally, it's the smallest chunk of calorie burn.
In Contrast…
Non-exercise activity (NEAT) accounts for about 15% of you total daily energy burn.
Plus the thermic effect of food (TEF) is another 10% of your total daily energy burn.
So that's ~25% of total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). And 5x the impact of exercise alone for energy burn.
领英推荐
Three cool things to note:
All this means is looking at regular lifestyle habits and day-to-day behaviour which is not a 'time requirement' but rather, a change of 'how you do things within your time'.
Now Put 2 + 2 Together…
? Which do you think is a better starting point and more sustainable focus for weight loss..?
? Lean heavily on the 1.79% - 2.98% of your time per week via 3-5 exercise hours just to get a 5% impact on your TDEE, in order to lose weight. And that's if you manage to get 3-5 hours worth of exercise every single week. Or…
? Change & tweak daily habits and how you behave during your awake time (which is ~119 available hours per week depending on sleep) to impact NEAT and TEF of which accounts for 25% of TDEE.
Which option sounds more impactful for weight loss do you think..?
Main Point:
? Exercise absolutely matters… but not as a primary way to lose weight. It's just not the most effective, mentally sane, or time conducive approach to lean on.
? Instead, as I always do with clients, focus on the behaviour changes that can be impacted across the other approximate 119 hours per week - even if you're working, traveling for work, commuting, or working from home, you have far more ability to impact your TDEE both immediately and for the long term. You already use this time, but how you use it is the difference. Exercise then compliments all of this.
The Reframe:
? Exercise will of course impact weight loss, but not as directly as you think - certainly not long term if you go with the 'calorie burn' mindset. It's not about how many calories you burn with exercise. This is what leads to frustration and weight loss fatigue.
? You might not realise it, but exercise impacts thermic effect of food (TEF). And also helps to raise your BMR in the long term. Not to mention it:
I could have kept going on. But you get the point.
? And almost all of the above points impact weight loss and maintenance indirectly. That's a lot of improvements to weight management from just doing intentional exercise, and of course more importantly, your quality of life, relationships, functional ability and performance.
Reframe your view of exercise.
Exercise is absolutely important, but it's a broken concept to view as a 'weight loss' activity. The other thing is, once - or 'if' - you lose weight, what happens to your motivation and reasoning to show up and exercise?
You already know the answer. It's a finite, temporary, surface level motivation.?
Whereas weight loss requires sustainable, deeply meaningful motivations.
But that's another can of worms for another time.
If you're not already a member, join 'The Inspired Leaders Community ' for more newsletters from 'Leading by Example: Men's Health & Mental Strength'.
Need evidence that this way of thinking works?
See client results here: The Inspired Leader Project
Or listen to Tom: