Near Death

Near Death is a great Deep topic! Trish Kane, MBA is a great person to discuss it with. Trish described her origin story back when we 1st met and I look forward to her sharing it with our Easy to read Deep Thoughts audience 12pm (EST) this Friday. Life & Death First, I naturally find myself considering this from a Six Sigma-type perspective with both ‘Life’ and ‘Death’ as chronologically dependent values on a common, normal, simple graph. This view takes the edge off for me and makes the greater context a bit more visible.?

Why?

Why have a start and stop in the 1st place? Perfect systems don’t need to be refreshed and evolution given enough time should eliminate problems (like Death and the need for Birth) = perfect system of order.?

Disorder

Life is order within disorder which when viewed from high-level perspectives, all disorder becomes order. Example: existence or not existence. Existence of existence = order. I’m a heavy reader and empathetic thinker of the authors who wrote the book I’m reading. A significant amount of the most prolific deep thinkers concluded “a” God was real.?

Carl Yung?

I geeked out on Carl Yung's books for the last 3 years or so and I interpret his take as similar to Einstein's. It's interesting to consider the non-god alternatives.

Without going too deep on that vein specifically (not deep = ironic), Non-god is less supported by the observable evidence and I spoke to the observable evidence in a previous Deep Thought post. Quick recap = We’ve never measured nothing = ‘Nothing’ before the Big Bang or in any other scientifically dependent concussion is NOT scientifically sound = 0 evidence of nothing = 0 evidence of nothing before the Big Bang.??

Near Death

Bringing the above back to the center, what is death and in turn, what's it like to be near it? My nothing point above concludes death being nothing (final) is the least probable. Life and Death = normal cognitive measurement bias.

Our perception of Life and Death seems important because we can’t measure anything before or after it. This is a measurement issue, not a philosophical data point. Similar to my Big Bang point above, all conclusions should conclude something and never conclude nothing. What happens after death = something. Absence of consciousness = to nothing.