Neal's Deals (Vol. 76) - The True Cost of Gold: Unveiling the Price of Hosting the Olympic Games ????????
Hey everyone – As the summer winds down and nations celebrate their achievements from the Paris Olympics, many, including myself, are curious about the economic implications of such a grand event. After some initial research, it's clear that both the Summer and Winter Olympics come at a significant cost. In recent decades, these spectacles have been spoiled by budget overruns, long-term debts, underutilized infrastructure, displacement, political issues, and environmental damage.
Paris marks the first Olympics since Sydney to come in under $10 billion in total costs. This shift comes as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) faced dwindling interest from cities willing to host due to the financial disasters of past Games. Hosting had become an expensive burden, with little hope of long-term financial gains.
However, some economists and researchers argue that achieving a truly sustainable Olympics will require a fundamental reimagining of the Games. In this fun edition of Neal’s Deals, let's dive into the true costs of hosting the Olympics, why the event has become so expensive, the immediate and lasting impacts they leave behind, and what could be done to make them more viable in the future.
Why so expensive?
The Olympics have become prohibitively expensive due to escalating costs over the last few decades. After the financial disaster of the 1976 Montreal Games and safety concerns from the violent events at the 1968 and 1972 Games, cities became wary of hosting. Los Angeles, the only bidder for the 1984 Olympics, avoided major expenses by using existing infrastructure and securing corporate sponsorships, which led to a $215 million profit. This success reignited intense competition among cities to host the Games, but bidding alone became increasingly costly, sometimes exceeding $100 million.
As the scale of the Olympics grew, so did the financial burden on host cities. Infrastructure costs skyrocketed as cities like Sochi, Rio, and Beijing spent tens of billions of dollars to build sports facilities, Olympic Villages, and transport systems. For example, Rio had to construct 15,000 new hotel rooms just to meet the IOC's requirements. These investments, often totaling over $50 billion, were intended to provide long-term benefits, but they frequently left cities with underused facilities and mounting debt. Operational costs also contribute significantly to the financial strain. Security expenses surged from $250 million for Sydney in 2000 to $2.8 billion for Tokyo in 2020. Many cities are still paying off debts from past Games, and the financial strain has made hosting increasingly unattractive, with some cities winning Olympic bids unopposed due to the reluctance of others to take on the costs.
Short- and long-term impacts?
Extravagant sports events like the Olympics often promise intangible benefits, such as short- and long-term economic boosts from the preparation, the event itself, and the ripple effects in the years that follow. However, economists argue that these potential benefits are typically offset by significant economic losses and debt. Large facilities built for the Games often disrupt daily commerce, consume valuable real estate, and divert resources away from essential infrastructure projects. The ongoing costs of maintaining these facilities—many of which end up as "white elephants" used infrequently or left abandoned—further strain public finances. Beyond financial costs, there are also invisible impacts, such as displacement of lower-income residents, gentrification, and environmental damage.
While some claim hosting the Olympics can put a city on the map and attract future tourism and investment, these assertions are often exaggerated. At best, cities may break even or see a small surplus if the planning is done correctly and the city is already well-developed. Economic impact is often neutral, as the influx of visitors is balanced by others avoiding the area during the event. Long-term tourism benefits may require additional investments, as seen with Lake Placid, which has spent hundreds of millions maintaining its Olympic facilities since hosting the Winter Games in 1980. Once a city commits to such a large project, it's difficult to stop funding it due to ongoing political and special interest pressures.
What should change?
Economists agree that the Olympic Games require significant reforms to make hosting more affordable and sustainable. The current bidding process encourages wasteful spending, often leading to inflated budgets driven by local construction and hospitality interests. Corruption and limited revenue-sharing from the IOC further exacerbate the issue. Some propose reducing the burden by limiting hosting to wealthier nations or designating a permanent cities to reuse infrastructure and avoid the high costs of rotating venues. Upcoming hosts like Milan in 2026 and Los Angeles in 2028 will test the strategy of utilizing existing infrastructure, but many believe that the more radical solutions, such as the permanent host cities, may be necessary for the long-term viability of the Olympics.
Let’s get to it:
领英推荐
Grid Status, a Chicago startup that provides real-time data monitoring and mapping of the U.S. electric grid, raised an $8 million round led by?Energize Capital.
Why this is interesting: The electric grid is evolving rapidly with increased renewable energy adoption, rising demand, and growing challenges from extreme weather and market volatility. Grid Status offers a real-time data platform that simplifies grid insights, allowing energy professionals to track fuel mix, load, prices, and more. Since its 2023 launch, Grid Status has grown to over 10,000 users, providing valuable tools like dashboards and the first real-time wholesale price map. Beyond the strong “why now”, this is also a very defensible business as grid data is challenging to access and use due to its complex, fragmented formats across different sources. While operators provide data, it often requires merging multiple files and datasets. Grid Status simplifies this by consolidating and updating the data, giving users easy, centralized access that competitors cannot replicate easily.
Ferretly, an Easton, Maryland startup that offers AI-powered social media background checks to help companies evaluate potential hires based on their online behavior, raised a $2.5 million seed round led by?David Dickerson.
Why this is interesting: Ferretly uses AI to scan social media and online data to identify potential risks and behaviors that traditional background checks might miss. This helps hiring managers ensure candidates align with company values, avoiding hires with problematic online behavior such as threats or hate speech. Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, the company has launched an Election Personnel Screening Platform to assess the behavior of candidates and election workers, flagging issues like hate speech, bullying, and extremist connections. While Ferretly's tool might feel unsettling to some, it serves as a stark reminder that everything shared online leaves a lasting digital footprint. As the lines between professional and personal lives blur on social media, people need to be more cautious, as platforms like Ferretly can impact employment. From an investor's perspective, this addresses a critical pain point that will likely become even more urgent in the years ahead. If their technology remains ahead of alternative solutions, this one could be a winner.
Guardoc Health, a Tel Aviv startup that offers an AI-driven platform designed for nurses whose aim is to improve clinical charting accuracy by integrating with electronic health records, raised a $3 million seed round led by?Pitango.
Why this is interesting: Guardoc Health is an AI-powered SaaS solution that integrates with electronic health records (EHRs) to identify errors, discrepancies, and gaps in real-time clinical charting. By enabling timely corrections, Guardoc addresses the risk of compromised patient care due to documentation errors. Leveraging machine learning and natural language models, continuously refined by practicing nurses, Guardoc streamlines patient care processes while ensuring its tool remains intuitive and seamlessly fits into daily workflows for healthcare professionals. I would be curious to learn more about how frequently clinical charts contain errors and, if this is common, to what extent Guardoc effectively highlights and remediates these issues. Considering how difficult it is to sell into hospital systems, I would want to make sure that this is a category defining solution to help ease the go-to-market.
Deals in the Works:?If you want to learn more - feel free to reach out
_____
Quote of the week:
“Count your age by friends, not years. Count your life by smiles, not tears.”
John Lennon ??
_____
Have a great weekend everyone! See you after Labor Day!