Navigating Uncertainty: The Need for Comprehensive Investigation and Systematic Solutions in Maritime Safety
Image accessed from The Guardian

Navigating Uncertainty: The Need for Comprehensive Investigation and Systematic Solutions in Maritime Safety

In the wake of the unfortunate incident involving the MV Dali, which resulted in the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, there has been a rush to conclude both the causes of the accident and the potential measures for preventing similar events.? While such eagerness may reflect a commendable desire for action and improvement, it's crucial to understand the complete story behind such failures before leaping towards solutions.

On March 26, the MV Dali, a NeoPanamax class cargo ship, experienced a catastrophic power outage while navigating the Patapsco River off the Port of Baltimore.? This incident led to a loss of steering control and, ultimately, the ship colliding with a critical infrastructure component.? Preliminary findings suggest that issues with the backup generators, possibly stemming from contaminated fuel or malfunctioning fuel pumps, played a role.? These early insights, while valuable, are only part of a much broader investigation that must consider every layer of system interactions and dependencies.

In response, questions have arisen regarding the feasibility of equipping ships with lithium-ion or similar class storage batteries to provide emergency power for critical functions like steering and rudder control.? At first glance, this suggestion appears to be a rational safety enhancement.? However, implementing such a solution requires a thorough risk assessment based on a full systems engineering approach.

Several vital challenges need addressing:

  • Energy Requirements: The energy needed to operate a ship's steering and rudder control systems during emergencies is substantial.? Lithium-ion batteries, while capable of storing significant amounts of energy, would need to be extraordinarily large and powerful to meet these demands.
  • Cost and Space: The financial outlay for such a system and the space it would occupy on ships already optimised for cargo efficiency makes this a complex proposition.? Integrating large battery banks could lead to a decrease in cargo capacity or require significant design alterations.
  • Safety Concerns: The maritime environment poses unique risks for lithium-ion technology, primarily related to potential hazards such as fires or explosions in case of damage.? Ensuring the safety of these batteries involves complex and costly protective measures.
  • Maintenance and Lifespan: Given the harsh conditions at sea, maintaining a battery system can be challenging and expensive, compounded by the limited lifespan of batteries and the need for their periodic replacement.
  • Technological and Regulatory Evolution: The maritime sector is governed by stringent safety and regulatory standards that often delay the adoption of new technologies.? Like a lithium-ion battery backup, any new system would require exhaustive testing and regulatory review.

Given the complexities involved, any proposed solution to enhance maritime safety must be carefully vetted and developed with a holistic view of potential benefits and inherent risks.? As the industry moves forward, it's essential to balance innovation with rigorous safety standards, ensuring that new technologies address the causes of such failures and are sustainable and secure in the long term.

In conclusion, while seeking immediate answers and quick fixes is human nature, maritime operations and safety realities require a measured, thoughtful approach.? We must resist the temptation to jump to conclusions before thoroughly analysing and understanding all evidence; you don't get fit jumping to conclusions.

Only through comprehensive investigation and careful consideration of all factors can we hope to devise effective controls and prevent future tragedies.

Alan Langstone

Fractional Safety Leader - Helping your small-to-medium business be successful

11 个月

Nicely put Dr. Garry Marling! While I agree with your thoughts, do you think it’s possible that at some point we could have looked through the operating system and processes and asked the question, what would happen is we lost power after we had set sail? Obviously after the fact, it’s an obviously hindsight question, but it does seem quite a reasonable one. It would also seem that the bridge defense against this eventuality was either insufficient or had not been maintained. Other examples. We know the EV’s have been known to have battery fires, yet a boat used to carry them didn’t have a suppression system capable of dealing with the event. Whether it is the boat manufacturers, the operators, the insurers, the port authorities, etc., it feels like while regulations and risk management are at the superficial end of the spectrum. I bet the fire extinguishers had been inspected before they left the dock.

Susie Scott

Safety & Risk Executive | Human & Organizational Performance (Personal Account - Views expressed are my own)

11 个月

Thank you for presenting the most measured, rationale recommendations I've seen so far relating to this incident. The rush to judgment and blame that has been thrown around at multiple impacted parties is disappointing at best. There are undoubtedly potential improvements that could be implemented to mitigate future risk, but as you say, we need to be sure we don't introduce new hazards or tie operators up in red tape without positively impacting potential outcomes.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dr. Garry Marling的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了