Navigating Uncertainty: A Crude Oil Market Analysis amidst Geopolitical Tensions

OPEC+ Output Cuts Set to Endure at $90 Oil Absent 2Q Demand Lift

Substantial indications of an oil-request recuperation in 2Q are required for OPEC+ to begin tightening the result cuts that were again supported at the gathering's most recent April 3 virtual gathering. Current checks are demonstrating compelling in keeping the market tight, with individuals OK with the $90-a-barrel cost. The following face to face gathering is booked for June

Output Curbs Could Persist Through Year-End

The choice by OPEC+ to stay with its ongoing result cuts - - 2 million barrels of oil a day - - until the end of 1H is in accordance with our assumptions and exhibits the technique is demonstrating compelling in keeping the market somewhat close and supporting unrefined. Economic situations will direct the 2H game plan that is expected to be chosen at the following face to face June 1 gathering, with unmistakable indications of a 2Q interest recuperation expected to begin tightening cuts. Assuming interest possibilities stay hopeless - - with waiting vulnerability in China - - the gathering is probably going to broaden cuts into 3Q. Rough at the higher finish of the OPEC+ $80-$90 a barrel range actually seems agreeable for its individuals, in light of our computations.

Production cuts seems to have been good up until this point, and will again be firmly watched through the remainder of 2024

Energy, Crude Oil Melting vs. Gold, Money Supply

Inflation is "consistently and all over, a financial peculiarity" from Milton Friedman is working out in energy wares collapsing versus gold and risks speed increase in 2024. The Bloomberg Energy Spot Subindex and WTI crude oil on March 25 are around similar levels as 2006. Energy products' inclination to be among the most obviously awful performing is striking when contrasted and cash supply and gold. Beginning around 1991, the energy index is up around 320%, yet comparative with gold and cash, energy costs are down around 30%.

Autocorrelation might be the memorable catchphrase in energy exchanging and the 1Q cost skip takes a chance with powering exorbitant cost fix notions. Our inclination is WTI is bound to return toward $70 a barrel this year and on the off chance that international occasions flash a push toward $100, flexibility and worldwide recessionary powers may just postpone $70 inversion

Investors are increasing their exposure to oil assets as an inflation hedge and to benefit from high dividend yields, indicating a shift to the late investment cycle, which typically precedes a recession. Gold and copper prices rose significantly from Feb. 26 to March 25, suggesting that investors were anticipating persistent inflation. However, stronger-than-expected CPI data for February indicates that the narrative of rate cuts in the first half of the year is facing a reality check.

Persistent inflation could lead to higher US rates for a longer period, potentially hampering global growth and energy demand. Investors may reduce their exposure to commodities and related equities as global growth slows. Despite WTI crude's 5.6% rise over the past month, it could soon experience a pullback.

Historical analysis indicates that oil prices tend to spike in the 12 months before a recession. During the peaks of WTI in 2008, 2011, 2018, and 2022, oil prices delivered an average return of 65% in the year leading up to a recession, while share prices of Asian oil equities rose by an average of 26%. However, WTI could potentially decline by 23.1% from the spot price of $81.95 on March 25 to our fair value of $63 if the global economic outlook deteriorates

What’s next for Crude Oil? Analysts Weigh In After Iran’s Attack

Oil futures?were barely moved by Iran’s unprecedented attack on Israel, with traders attributing the lackluster price action to expectations that the conflict would remain contained. As Israel weighs its response to the assault, here’s what market watchers are saying about the outlook:

‘Risk Premium’ — Goldman Sachs “We estimate that oil prices already reflect a $5-to-$10-a-barrel risk premium from downside risks to supply,” before the weekend attacks by Iran, Goldman Group Sachs Inc. analysts including?Daan Struyven?said in a note. “The potential Israeli response to Iran’s attack is highly uncertain and will likely determine the extent of threat to regional oil supply.” Iranian crude production has risen by more than 20%, over the past two years to 3.4 million barrels a day, or about 3.3% of global supply, the analysts said. So, “if the market were to price a higher probability of reduced Iran supply, then this could contribute to a higher geopolitical risk premium,” they said.

‘Escalation Is Unlikely’ — ANZ Banking Group “The fact that the attack was so well-telegraphed suggests any further escalation is unlikely,” said?Daniel Hynes, senior commodity strategist at ANZ Banking Group Ltd. “The geopolitical risk premium is also elevated, so it doesn’t warrant any further gains until Israel’s response to this attack is clear.” “The market needs to see further evidence that supply is at greater risk before pushing prices higher,” he added.

Conclusion

The situation is fluid, and for the oil market, everything depends now on how Israel’s response and the chance of a cycle of escalation.?Still, we can draw a few tentative conclusions:

1) Despite recent events, the global oil supply remains unaffected, with Middle Eastern crude continuing to flow freely into the market. The Strait of Hormuz, a critical energy passage, remains open for shipping. In simple terms, there is currently no shortage of oil.

2) However, the potential for future disruptions has heightened. Recent events have altered the landscape in the Middle East, indicating an increased risk of instability. Iran's significant military actions, including the deployment of drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles, suggest a deliberate attempt to test Israel's defenses. This increased risk should be reflected in the options market, which may show a rise in out-of-the-money call contracts.

3) It appears that Iran's intent was to provoke a response from Israel to de-escalate tensions, rather than sparking a full-scale regional conflict. Even before the attack, Tehran signaled that it viewed the event as a one-time defensive action in response to Israeli aggression. If Israel views its response, with support from the U.S. and Arab nations, as a strategic success, the region could return to its previous state of precarious stability. In this scenario, headline oil prices may not experience a significant rally, with the risk being more accurately reflected in the options market.

4) Unless there is a sustained cycle of retaliatory attacks between Israel and Iran that disrupts oil supply, OPEC+ has sufficient spare production capacity to manage any price increase. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Iraq are maintaining approximately 5 million barrels per day offline, which is about 5% of global demand and exceeds Iran's current production capacity.

Technical Overview

After giving a breakout above 85, Brent gave a strong rally to 90 fueled technically and by the escalation in the Middle East. It is currently facing resistance at the 78.6% FIB Retracement level. It looks like if the escalation in the middle east increases, only that will take Brent higher the $92 level, on the other hand retrace back to 85-87 levels Geopolitical tensions ease off.

?

References:

-Bloomberg (Javier Blas Articles ; Data Charts)

-LSEG Workspace