Navigating the Nuances of Control: Direct vs. Indirect Control
In the complex world of asset protection and estate planning, understanding the dynamics between direct and indirect control is crucial for safeguarding wealth and ensuring its seamless transition across generations. The distinction between these two forms of control can significantly influence how assets are protected, managed and passed down – which offers a strategic advantage to those who master it.
Direct Control: A Straightforward Approach
Direct control is the most straightforward form of influence, where an individual or entity has the explicit authority to manage and control their assets. This form of control is characterized by the immediate power to make decisions, often resulting in quick and efficient management. As an example of direct control, you might engage a real estate broker to sell a property you own and you would be the signatory on the transaction documents. Direct control, however, comes with its set of vulnerabilities, especially when it concerns asset protection and long-term planning.
Indirect Control: A Subtle Yet Powerful Strategy
Indirect control, on the other hand, operates on a more nuanced level. It involves influencing decisions and managing assets through intermediaries or structural arrangements, without having direct authority. This approach is epitomized by the scenario involving a prominent figure, such as a former President, who, upon assuming office, transferred control of his company to his children. Though he relinquished direct control, the underlying familial dynamics and potential repercussions on estate distribution imply a form of indirect control that can sway decisions significantly. As an example of indirect control, you might instruct the trustee of your trust to sell a property and your trustee would then engage a real estate broker to accomplish your objective and your trustee would be the signatory on the transaction documents.
Continue reading the full article on our website – Read Now.
This material has been prepared by Sollertis for informational purposes only and nothing herein is intended as legal advice for any particular or individual situation. You should not rely upon any information herein as a source of legal advice, and receipt of any such information does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Sollertis. Viewers and readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.