Navigating The Markets During & After COVID-19
Pavlovsk Museum Preserve - Stormy Sea at Night

Navigating The Markets During & After COVID-19

Markets are not functioning as you've seen in prior decades. Globally, fiscal spending and monetary policies are warping free and open markets into Franken-Economies. This means, as things move forward, the performance of stock and bond markets are going to be highly dependent on government policies (globally). Governments are fighting price deflation (which is caused by over-used inflationary monetary policies with no currency peg).

Once real interest rates reach 0% globally and there's no fiscal responsibility for fiat nations, policymakers effectively have two tools remaining to fight the price deflation (in fiat terms). First, they can use QE (been doin’ that), or, they can use Universal Basic Income UBI (just getting that one started).

There are many paths to push fiat into those two ports (QE & UBI). UBI is fiat insertions straight to the masses while QE is fiat insertions straight to the fewer at the top. QE insertions increase the value of bonds, stocks, and real estate (in nominal fiat terms) while UBI will increase the price of commodities the masses demand most (in nominal fiat terms). If the balance between both of these insertion ports (QE and UBI) are not managed perfectly, extreme moves in asset prices and/or in CPI will occur. 

The more these inflationary monetary policies combined with fiscal irresponsibility are exercised, the more violent the moves become over time. The reason why is the manipulation is accelerative or exponential over time. It's easier to see with its overuse. Without a pegged currency, governments will continue to pursue this path.

The navigation of these waters will be extremely difficult for people participating in financial markets. The reason why is your performance is highly dependent upon the decisions of policymakers. For instance, which port will they decide to infuse with fiat next (to the masses UBI or to the top QE). It's extremely difficult to know and understand the lagging impacts and factors. In the end, a new, globally pegged, currency will need to be established for REAL capitalism and free and open markets to occur in the future. I have opinions on what that is, but many are quite animated and have different takes. Regardless, if a new currency does emerge, the results for stocks and bonds over the long-haul are quite predictable.

At the end of that currency transition, bonds denominated in fiat will be completely impaired. This will likely happen abruptly and with nearly no notice. The reason why is global governments will continue to exercise QE up to the point where the tool has a catastrophic failure. This is done in practice by pegging yields at zero percent (the government can do this by simply swapping cash for bond selling once a particular yield ceiling is met). This will appear like the bond market is fine (because it's not demonstrating any volatility in the yield), but in reality, it's a VERY sick puppy.  This will persist until trust starts to dissipate from the market due to social unrest (remember QE makes asset prices go up for the wealthier population - not the masses).

Stocks throughout this period will be a mixed bag but in general, they will underperform pegged currencies like gold and Bitcoin. The companies that will outperform other stocks are the ones that will save consumers money and also offer essential goods/services during depression-like hardships. Companies that are very lean in operations/manufacturing and that have strong balance sheets will be able to weather the churn much better. It'll be very important to be open to a very wide array of potential outcomes moving forward because so much is dependent upon the enormous policy responses that are yet to come and the timeline of social responses that are very unpredictable. Many blessings to everyone as they safely navigate through these difficult and volatile times.

Comments are very welcome and help everyone understand this complex situation better.

Jacob "Jake" Fisch

Founder & CEO Danville Group | Acorn International (formerly NYSE: ATV) | YPO

4 年

While I accept the soundness of an investment thesis focused on gold/commodities amidst a global inflationary environment, it's not clear how a peg serves the broader goal -- assuming this goal is maintaining social stability and preserving social cohesion. Are you arguing for a return to gold standard and non-intervention? The Euro, a recent example, is a challenged regime where monitory controls and fiscal interests are not aligned. I would love to better understand the position you are arguing for.

Vyom Joshi, P.E.

Sr. Electrical Engineer at Flint Hills Resources

4 年

Great article Preston! I have been thinking about the domestic inflationary pressures that come along with QE and UBI. So, it appears that if we just look at an isolated situation of United States (where everything is manufactured and consumed domestically), yes, we are bound to have inflation. However, how does USD hold up when other countries in the world are also easing their monetary and/or fiscal policies is the real question. Moreover, as Richard Duncan points out, it is also important for us to focus on the fact that globalization in itself is deflationary, as it offsets the inflation created by fiat money creation by US. Since we live in a globalized era, where we have a global workforce, I think we also need to focus on the different kinds of economies. When we look at some export based economies such as China, we can see that as USD devalues after the money creation, it hurts the Chinese economy (as USD isn't strong anymore). At that point, China might be incentivized to either buy up some USD denominated assets to take the dollar out of circulation, or maybe simply devalue its own currency to ensure than the ratio of USD to CHY remains fairly stable. Since the United States is a global consumer, many export based/manufacturing economies depend on the USD. I suspect that we might see inflation in those export/manufacturing economies before we actually see inflation in the United States - afterall, it is the low wages of foreign workers and cheap foreign products that is keeping prices of goods in the United States low. I really liked your article, Preston. :)

Garett B.

Retired Educator and Engineer

4 年

Great article Preston. A balance between UBI and QE is precarious as it teeters back and forth looking for that razor's edge to be steady. Is there a 3rd component to help the balance be less precarious? Three typically provides more stabiliy than 2 (my analogy from engineering and math like that of a barstool).

回复
Raymond Bednar

Government Contracting | Program Management | Risk and Operations Management | Strategic and Organizational Effectiveness | Data Analytics and Analysis

4 年

Thanks Preston.

Gustavo A. Calderón

40-Year IT & Business Professional | TS/SCI Active Clearance | Executive CxO Leadership | Mix Industry & Public Experience | Federal Acquisition Leader | IT Program Delivery | Lifelong Learner | Ironman Triathlete

4 年

Pictured here, a Central Banker, a Mega Yacht Owner, and an Average Joe.

  • 该图片无替代文字

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了