Navigating the dichotomy: glimmers of innovation versus triggers of inciteful behaviour
Source: NOIRLab / NSF / AURA, P. Marenfeld

Navigating the dichotomy: glimmers of innovation versus triggers of inciteful behaviour

ANZSOG - The Australia and New Zealand School of Government summarised an insightful conversation among public service leaders. This triggered me to reflect on my experience of awesome learning environments to support transformation in public services, and the complete opposite.

Public Service Innovation

Investing in new and useful ways of working is essential in public service as complexities in societal challenges grow. Yet, many transformative ideas falter amidst traditional bureaucracies. This dynamic is captured in the analogy "glimmers of innovation versus triggers of inciteful behaviour."

Glimmers of Innovation

The phrase "glimmers of innovation" highlights rare, bright moments of creativity within an organisation. These innovative sparks are potential game-changers that could streamline processes and fundamentally improve public service functions. They may even pave pathways to transformation and system change. However, like stars obscured by city lights, these glimmers often get overlooked or extinguished by entrenched norms. They represent a break from traditional thinking and the seeds of substantial progress and improvement.

Triggers of Inciteful Behavior

On the flip side, "triggers of inciteful behaviour" reflect the automatic negative reactions that innovation can provoke. These reactions are defensive mechanisms within organisational cultures that resist change, acting as counter-forces that incite opposition and regression. The fear of change, loss of control, or new risks can drive well-intentioned leaders to subconsciously undermine beneficial initiatives.

Cultural Barrier and Toxicity

The interaction between innovative impulses and reactionary forces creates a complex landscape for change-makers, balancing the push for modernisation against conservative, risk-averse tendencies. This tension isn't just a logistical challenge—it's a cultural barrier that can lead to toxicity.

A toxic environment emerges when innovative and outcome-orientated individuals face consistent hostility and dismissiveness. This negativity can demoralise staff, stifle creativity, and result in a high turnover rate as employees seek more sustainable workplaces. The long-term impact is severe, rendering the organisation stagnant and unable to adapt to external demands.

Bridging the Gap

Navigating this dichotomy requires cultivating an environment that supports and sustains innovation through several strategies:

  • Leadership Commitment: Leaders must provide clear support for innovation, supplying both the vision, nurturing an investment mindset, and so investing and providing the resources needed to foster change.
  • Cultural Shift: Organisations must intentionally shift their culture to value and embrace change, facilitated through authentic learning environments, open communication, and celebrating innovation champions, with leaders again knowing what to nurture and what to praise.
  • Robust Accountability Structures: Effective accountability, delegation, and feedback systems are essential to constructively critique and implement ideas while preventing negative backlash. These mechanisms ensure that innovations are both responsible and responsive to the organisation's goals.
  • Developing Risk Maturity: It is crucial to cultivate a tolerance for calculated risks, particularly those involving novel trade-offs where traditional experiences may not apply. By viewing failures as learning opportunities, organisations can reduce the fear associated with innovation and better adapt to contemporary and future challenges. This approach encourages embracing risks that traditional models might overlook, thereby future-proofing organisational strategies.

Conclusion

The analogy of "glimmers of innovation versus triggers of inciteful behaviour" illustrates the challenges of introducing new ideas in conservative environments. Understanding and addressing these dynamics allows organisations to innovate and transform public service.



要查看或添加评论,请登录

Richard Catherall的更多文章

  • AI: Transaction or Transformation?

    AI: Transaction or Transformation?

    Most people interact with AI the same way they order two beers in Spanish—just enough to get what they need. It’s…

  • Honouring a Visionary Leader: Reflections on Bangladesh's Emerging Political Landscape.

    Honouring a Visionary Leader: Reflections on Bangladesh's Emerging Political Landscape.

    Acknowledging the perspective Jo Kelly has shared, I am motivated to offer another. The recent development of Professor…

  • Redressing Economic Imbalance with Financial Savvy

    Redressing Economic Imbalance with Financial Savvy

    Having recently completed the New Zealand Certificate in Financial Services, I am equipped with the knowledge and…

    8 条评论
  • Being here

    Being here

    Acknowledgements Most recently I was invited to join the board of Belong Aotearoa which enables me to collaborate with…

    3 条评论
  • Wellbeing and Migration: Trade-off or Gamble?

    Wellbeing and Migration: Trade-off or Gamble?

    Over 15 years ago, I led a thriving social enterprise in my dynamically changing city, working closely with agencies…

    2 条评论
  • When talk isn't cheap: Bridging the Gap Between Collaborative Ideals and Organisational Practices

    When talk isn't cheap: Bridging the Gap Between Collaborative Ideals and Organisational Practices

    An American walks into an English pub, expecting a lively evening filled with engaging conversations and new…

  • Lead like a gyroscope

    Lead like a gyroscope

    I wrote recently about there being nothing to fear in exploring extremes as reference points to find enough balance…

    5 条评论
  • A few notches back from the extreme

    A few notches back from the extreme

    If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is, infinite - William Blake The…

    5 条评论
  • Autonomy; the start of the question "Why entrepreneurship."

    Autonomy; the start of the question "Why entrepreneurship."

    This week and last I have pushed myself hard. In a manic moment, I met up with the co-founders of Noise Solution.

    1 条评论
  • The F-Word

    The F-Word

    Your target group doesn’t consider franchising as genuine entrepreneurship. That’s what they want.

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了