Navigating the Critical Decision: Choosing the Right Chairperson for Workplace Inquiries

Introduction:

An employer's decision on an external chairperson for a workplace inquiry involves various factors beyond financial considerations. While cost-effectiveness is crucial, other considerations may include a longstanding relationship or personal connections like being a family friend. In urgent situations, the willingness of someone readily accessible may outweigh the benefits of a more seasoned candidate. While these choices may address short-term needs, the potential risks associated with opting for an inexperienced chairperson underscore the critical importance of carefully selecting the right chairperson. Let's look at the significance of this decision-making process and the potential repercussions that may arise when the selection process lacks a comprehensive evaluation of both immediate requirements and long-term organisational needs.

?

Risks associated with Inexperienced Chairpersons:

Employee Reinstatement

Inexperienced chairpersons may mishandle proceedings, potentially leading to disputes and the reinstatement of employees. This can disrupt operational continuity and team dynamics. Additionally, their lack of knowledge may impede their ability to properly evaluate evidence, potentially leading to a mistaken discharge of the employer's onus to prove guilt on a balance of probabilities in disciplinary inquiries.

?

Compensation Claims

A lack of procedural expertise increases the likelihood of mistakes, providing grounds for compensation claims. This not only strains financial resources but also tarnishes the employer's reputation.

?

Legal Challenges

Navigating the legal landscape requires expertise. Inexperienced chairpersons may struggle, exposing employers to prolonged legal battles and diverting resources away from core business activities.

?

Reputational Damage

Publicized cases of unfair dismissals can harm the employer's reputation, affecting customer trust and employee morale. A negative public image may hinder recruitment efforts and customer retention.

?

Operational Disruptions

Reversals of disciplinary decisions can create internal tensions and disrupt the smooth functioning of businesses. Inexperienced chairpersons may inadvertently sow discord among team members, impacting overall productivity.

?

Having gained insights into the potential pitfalls of inexperienced chairpersons, let’s look at the critical attributes and knowledge that a chairperson should bring to the table.

?

Minimum Requirements for a Chairperson:

Neutrality and Impartiality

The chairperson should be perceived as neutral and impartial, without any personal or professional bias toward any party involved in the dispute.

They should not have any vested interest in the outcome of the inquiry, ensuring that they can make objective and unbiased decisions.

?

Expertise and Knowledge

The individual chosen should possess the relevant expertise and knowledge related to the nature of the dispute or the industry in which the organisation operates.

A comprehensive understanding of labour legislation, company policies, and conflict-resolution procedures is essential. The chairperson must have proficiency in various statutes, including but not limited to the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended), the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (as amended), the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 (as amended), and the National Minimum Wage Act 9 of 2018.

?

Communication and Facilitation Skills

Effective communication skills are essential for a chairperson to facilitate open and honest dialogue among the parties involved.

They should be skilled in managing discussions, ensuring that all perspectives are considered, and encouraging a constructive atmosphere.

?

Judgment and Analytical Skills

A chairperson needs to have strong judgment and analytical skills to assess evidence, evaluate arguments, and make fair and informed decisions.

They should be able to critically analyse information and apply relevant principles to reach sound conclusions.

?

Experience in Conflict Resolution

Experience in resolving workplace conflicts or conducting inquiries is highly valuable. This experience equips the chairperson with the necessary skills to navigate complex interpersonal dynamics and find resolutions.

?

Integrity and Ethics

The chairperson must uphold high standards of integrity and ethical conduct. Trust in the fairness and ethical behavior of the chairperson is essential for the credibility of the inquiry process.

?

Cultural Sensitivity

Awareness and sensitivity to cultural differences within the workplace are important, especially in diverse environments. This helps the chairperson understand the context and potential sources of conflict.

?

Availability and Time Commitment

The chairperson should be available and committed to dedicating the necessary time and effort to conduct a thorough inquiry. Delays can hinder the effectiveness of the process.

??

Benefits of Experienced Chairpersons

Engaging an experienced chairperson for a workplace inquiry provides employers with numerous advantages. Their procedural expertise guarantees a meticulously executed process, mitigating the risk of errors and promoting a fair and efficient investigation. Moreover, their in-depth knowledge of labour law proves instrumental in navigating legal complexities, minimising the likelihood of legal challenges and ensuring strict compliance. Lastly, the capability of seasoned professionals to uphold fairness and impartiality throughout the inquiry is paramount. This not only increases the employer's chances of successfully contesting dispute referrals by aggrieved employees (or former employees) but also cultivates a perception of procedural equity among employees, contributing to a workplace environment characterised by transparency and fairness.

?

Conclusion

The potential risks associated with inexperienced chairpersons, such as employee reinstatement, compensation claims, and legal challenges, highlight the crucial need for seasoned experts in these roles. Procedural errors and a lack of expertise may result in operational disruptions, damage to reputations, and strained resources, significantly impacting employee morale, customer trust, and overall business productivity.

On the contrary, opting for experienced chairpersons brings numerous advantages. Their procedural expertise ensures a meticulous and error-free inquiry process, promoting fairness and efficiency. They navigate legal complexities adeptly, reducing the likelihood of legal challenges and ensuring compliance with labour legislation. Seasoned professionals also contribute to a transparent and procedurally equitable workplace environment.

Günther is a senior attorney at Patton Williams Inc. He specialises in employee relations and labour litigation and often presides over or initiates workplace inquiries. Contact him at [email protected] .