Navigating the complexities of organisational transformation

In the realm of organisational transformation, effective change leadership is essential. Malcom Higgs and Deborah Rowland, in their article 'All Changes Great and Small: Exploring Approaches to Change and its Leadership’ (2005), introduce a framework that categorises leaders’ change approaches into four quadrants:?Directive,?Master,?Self-assembly,?Emergence. Each quadrant represents different strategies and mindsets leaders must adopt to successfully navigate and implement high-magnitude change.

In short, the quadrants:

- Directive: This quadrant is characterised by top-down leadership, where leaders take charge and set the direction for change. This approach is essential in situations requiring quick decision-making and clear guidance. Leaders provide specific instructions and closely monitor progress to ensure compliance and alignment with the change objectives. While this approach can drive swift action and clarity, it may also lead to resistance if not managed with sensitivity and communication.

- Master: In this quadrant, leaders act as architects of change, meticulously planning and controlling the change process. They design detailed strategies and frameworks, anticipating potential obstacles and devising solutions in advance. This approach relies on the leader’s expertise and ability to foresee the implications of change initiatives. It is particularly effective in complex environments where precision and foresight are crucial. However, it requires leaders to remain adaptable and open to feedback, ensuring their plans remain relevant and effective.

- Self-assembly: This quadrant emphasises decentralised leadership. Leaders set a strategic direction but allow local adaptation, providing a set of toolkits and templates to guide the process. This approach encourages innovation within certain criteria but often involves limited capability and capacity development. The tight direction set by leaders ensures alignment, yet local managers have the autonomy to drive change within their specific contexts. This combines a predictable approach to change with a differentiated local implementation strategy.

- Emergence: This quadrant involves a more organic and adaptive approach to change, where leaders facilitate and nurture the natural evolution of ideas and practices within the organisation. This approach is suitable for highly dynamic environments where the future is uncertain and the path to change is not clearly defined. Leaders encourage experimentation, learning, and adaptation, allowing the organisation to evolve in response to internal and external changes. This requires a high degree of flexibility and a willingness to embrace ambiguity, as well as a strong focus on creating a culture that supports continuous learning and innovation.

Using this framework for analysis of their data, and considering various change contexts (see: 'The Leadership of Change: A Study of Change Leadership within the UK Royal?Air Force’ (2005)), Higgs and Wren found several key insights:

1. In high magnitude change, which impacts a large number of people and entails changes to multiple parts of the system, the most effective change approach is an?Emergent?one. Their research indicated that Emergent change accounted for 32% of variance in success in this context.
2. Change is a complex activity.?Approaches based on simpler assumptions about change, such as?Directive?change and?DIY?change, are generally less effective. In contrast, approaches that recognise and address the complexity of change, such as?Master?and?Emergent?approaches, tend to be more successful. Specifically, there are negative correlations between Directive and DIY approaches and success in most contexts.
3. An Emergent approach?appeared to be more successful than any of the other three approaches in most contexts. This approach explains a greater proportion of variance in success. However, many informants described using an Emergent approach from an intuitive rather than theoretically informed perspective. The data suggests that the Emergent approach occurs within a more planned and structured change framework, highlighting that it describes how change actually happens as opposed to how it is articulated.
4. A DIY approach to change, characterised by simplicity and wide differentiation, appears to be unsuccessful in any context. Informants' change stories showed that ‘toolkit' change consistently failed to support the required direction of change.

For creative leaders, successful change leadership is not about adhering strictly to one quadrant but rather about fluidly transitioning between them as circumstances demand. The key lies in integrating these approaches to create a dynamic and responsive leadership style that fosters resilience, innovation, and sustained performance in the face of change, ensuring organisations to be well-equipped to thrive in an ever-changing landscape.

I invite you to join our creative leadership program, kicking off with an in-person summit in September in Barcelona, where we explore these themes in depth and provide practical tools to help you become a more creative and effective leader. Together, we can unlock the creative potential within each of us and shape the future of our organisations.

#creativeleadership #changemanagement #systemicdesign #strategicforesight #marketing #CX #business #leadershipprogram