Navigating the Complexities of Implementing Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs)

Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs), introduced under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, have become a contentious topic among local authorities, law enforcement, and communities. These orders, designed to tackle anti-social behaviour (ASB) in public spaces, offer significant power to local councils. However, the journey from inception to enforcement is fraught with challenges, often resulting in ineffective implementation. My recent training and personal experiences have highlighted several key issues that must be addressed to avoid creating a "toothless tiger."

The Comprehensive Process of Authorising a PSPO

The process to get a PSPO authorised is far from straightforward. It demands extensive formal consultation with a broad range of partners, including residents, business owners, and landowners. Evidence gathering is crucial to justify the prohibitions and the specific area to be covered by the PSPO. Moreover, promoting the PSPO and ensuring sufficient signage to inform the public is just the beginning.

However, this initial phase, though labour-intensive, is merely the tip of the iceberg. The subsequent stage, focusing on enforcement, is where many councils falter.

The Critical Importance of Enforcement

A well-drafted PSPO is only as effective as its enforcement. Key considerations include:

1. Formal Enforcement Procedures: Councils need to establish clear, formal procedures for enforcing PSPOs. This includes detailing the roles and responsibilities of various enforcement officers.
2. Information Sharing: Effective communication channels must be in place to share information between the council and the police and other key partners. This ensures coordinated efforts in enforcing the order.
3. Capacity and Training: The police and council workers must have the capacity and training to enforce the PSPO. Often, the police are stretched thin with other priorities, which can result in inconsistent enforcement.
4. Adequate Training: All enforcement officers must receive comprehensive training on the specifics of the PSPO, including the legal framework and practical enforcement strategies.

The Risk of Rushing the Process

From my observations, councils often rush into the PSPO process, eager to address immediate concerns without fully considering long-term enforcement implications. This haste can lead to poorly enforced PSPOs, eroding public confidence in both the council and the police.

Alternatives and Long-Term Considerations

Before implementing a PSPO, it's crucial to explore whether other tools and powers might effectively address the issue. PSPOs should be seen as a last resort, not a quick fix. Additionally, once a PSPO is in place, discharging it can be challenging, and the three-year review process is exhaustive.

Conclusion

PSPOs can be a valuable tool in addressing anti-social behavior in public spaces, but their success hinges on meticulous planning and robust enforcement strategies. Councils must avoid the temptation to rush into implementing PSPOs without thorough research and consideration of alternative solutions. By focusing on enforcement and ensuring all involved parties are adequately trained and informed, PSPOs can become powerful instruments for maintaining public order and safety.

If you need further assistance or insights on implementing PSPOs effectively, please feel free to get in touch.

?