Navigating the Complex Relationship of the PWP in Advanced Work Packaging (AWP) - PWP by Supplier by Material by Purchase Order
Jose Gabriel Rosas
Simplifier of Complexity - Converts Strategy into Action - Construction Project Management - Advanced Work Packaging AWP - Data Analyst - Gigaprojects
Introduction
In the realm of Advanced Work Packaging (AWP), the Engineering Work Package (EWP) and the Construction Work Package (CWP) exhibit a straightforward 1:1 relationship facilitated by drawings. However, the Procurement Work Package (PWP) introduces unique challenges due to the intricacies of the procurement process. This article explores the factors that complicate the 1:1 relationship between the PWP, EWP, and CWP, and offers practical solutions to effectively manage these complexities. And as a bold proposal, create PWPs by material by supplier instead of maintaining the theorical 1:1 relationship between the EWP and CWP.
Understanding the Complex Relationship
The PWP does not align in a direct 1:1 relationship with either the EWP or the CWP for several reasons:
Illustrative Examples
Consider the following scenarios to illustrate the challenges encountered in the PWP relationship. Let's start with the image below, it shows how an EWP is made from multiple drawings and each drawing will have multiple materials. Then, there will be, in this case, one supplier for each type of material, and one Purchase Order (PO) for each supplier for each material, but the delivery will be made by lots.
Civil Concrete Drawing:?
Piping Drawing:
Managing the PWP Relationship
To address the challenges inherent in the PWP relationship with the EWP and CWP, implement the following strategies:
1. Prioritizing Materials from Suppliers:
??2. Creating Awareness of Material Importance:
Implementing Effective Project Management Practices
To effectively manage the PWP relationship, employ the following project management practices:
领英推荐
1.??Organizing PWP by Supplier:
Any material is purchased through a predefined Purchase Order (PO), that sometimes combines all the material for a specific project. Example: One PO for the steel of the whole project. Then, it is impossible to assign the EWPs or the CWPs in a 1:1 relationship.
To solve this, the PWPs have to be assigned, not even to the POs, but to the lots in which that PO will be broken down. In this way, the PWP is mapped to a specific supplier, a specific PO and a specific lot to be delivered on a specific time, aligning the CWP to it.
Below it the image showing all the relationships between a series of Civil-Concrete EWPs, how are they related to the PWPs (Lots from the POs) and how the materials need to be compiled again from multiple suppliers to fullfil the request of the CWPs
2.??Integrated Planning and Scheduling:
3.??Early Procurement Involvement:
4.??Supplier Collaboration:
5.??Material Tracking and Expediting:
6.??Risk Management:
By implementing these effective project management practices, including organizing the PWP by supplier, you can enhance collaboration, optimize material procurement, and mitigate potential delays or disruptions, thereby ensuring successful project execution.
Conclusion
The PWP in AWP introduces a complex relationship that differs from the 1:1 relationships between the EWP and CWP. By prioritizing materials, fostering awareness, and implementing effective project management practices, construction projects can mitigate procurement challenges, optimize material availability, and enhance project execution.
Do you want to learn more?
Check this book in amazon, Precision Planning: Construction Excellence through Advanced Work Packaging.