The nature of Nature

Introduction

??????????? A lot of studies are focusing on the benefits of Human-Nature interactions, with notable effects on our health and overall well-being (Barnes et al., 2019). Given the pressing challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss that confront us in the present day, fostering a closer engagement with nature in our daily lives has become not just relevant, but imperative (Nisbet et al., 2009). This imperative stems not only from the tangible benefits we derive from such interactions but also from the need for a deeper comprehension of our intrinsic connection with the natural world, which underpins these health benefits.

??????????? In this paper, our primary objective is to elucidate the concept of nature and its profound impact on our quality of life. While defining Nature may seem like a matter of common knowledge, delving into its true essence is imperative to grasp its intrinsic value. To achieve this, we will explore three distinct perspectives: Nature as a force, as a comprehensive material phenomenon, and as an inner quality.

Understanding Nature

??????????? When discussing Nature as a force, it evokes a sense of spirituality and is often associated with a specific force at the core of life and change (Ducarme & Couvet, 2020). This concept encapsulates the notion of something driving existence from its inception to its eventual demise. Such a perspective resonates deeply with various religious beliefs and mythologies, attributing divine or supernatural significance to this force. However, it's important to note that in this paper, we do not merely define this aspect of nature to distinguish it from other perspectives; rather, we aim to explore its implications and significance within the broader discourse.

??????????? With the second definition, when we talk about the hole material phenomenon, wherein Nature is conceived as a holistic material phenomenon encompassing all existence, including human beings (Ducarme & Couvet, 2020), we encounter a conceptual challenge. This perspective defines everything yet delineates nothing, presenting an elusive and immeasurable concept. However, when integrated with the first definition—Nature as a force—the notion of Nature as a holistic material entity imbued with vitality emerges. In essence, this amalgamation suggests that nature embodies life itself. Drawing upon Fritjof Capra (1996) mentioned, quantum theory offers insights into the interconnectedness inherent in physical materials, underscoring the intricate patterns of relationships between entities.

??????????? In addition to the preceding concept, it is imperative to introduce the notion of autopoiesis. Coined in 1972 by Chilean cellular biologists and systems theorists Varela and Maturana, autopoiesis, translating to "self-creation," elucidates the extraordinary capacity of living cells to self-replicate and self-organize (Kennan, 2022). This concept intricately intertwines with the idea of nature as an inner quality, encompassing the essence, intrinsic traits, and distinctive character that define the entirety of specific physical properties exhibited by objects, whether animate or inanimate. Consequently, the nature of Nature emerges as a manifestation of inner vitality, as highlighted by Fritjof Capra (2016), who asserts that "all living organisms continually respond to environmental influences with structural changes, according to their own natures”.

??????????? Expanding upon Capra's insights (2021), comprehending the nature of Nature necessitates a deeper understanding than merely unraveling the intricacies of DNA, genes, proteins, and other molecular components constituting living organisms. While these molecular structures are indeed fundamental building blocks, they also persist in inert entities, such as a lifeless piece of wood or bone. The distinguishing factor between a living organism and an inanimate object lies in the fundamental process of life known as metabolism.

???????????The understanding of metabolism includes two basic aspects. One is the continuous flow of energy and matter. All living systems need energy and food to sustain themselves, and all living systems produce waste. But life has evolved in such a way that organisms form ecological communities, or ecosystems, in which the waste of one species is food for the next, so that matter cycles continually through the ecosystem’s food webs. The second aspect of metabolism is the network of chemical reactions that process the food and form the biochemical basis of all biological structures, functions, and behavior. (Fritjof Capra, 2021, p.159)

??????????? Expanding upon this concept, the nature of Nature can be viewed as a living system comprised of intricate networks that constitute ecosystems. Central to this understanding is the Gaia Hypothesis proposed by James Lovelock (1972), which posits that living organisms interact with their surrounding inorganic environment to establish a synergistic and self-regulating system. This system, known as Gaia, is responsible for creating and maintaining the climate and biochemical conditions necessary to sustain life on Earth (Reichle, 2020). Through mutual interactions and feedback mechanisms, organisms and their environment coalesce to form a dynamic equilibrium, exemplifying the interconnectedness and interdependence inherent in the natural world.

??????????? In 2014, Fritjof Capra shed light on the evolution of scientific thought regarding networks. He noted that ecologists initially conceptualized ecosystems as communities of organisms interconnected through feeding relationships, illustrated by the notion of food webs. This approach extends to viewing organisms as networks of cells, and cells as networks of molecules, mirroring the interconnectedness observed in ecosystems composed of individual organisms. This paradigm shift underscores the pervasive presence of networks in understanding the complexity and interconnected nature of natural systems.

The Benefits of Nature

??????????? Following in that idea of interconnexions, the awareness of being connected with all of nature is particularly strong in ecology. The defining characteristic of Deep Ecology (founded by the Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess in the 1970s) is a shift from anthropocentric to ecocentric values. It is a worldview that acknowledges the inherent value of non-human life, recognizing that all living beings are members of ecological communities, bound together in networks of interdependencies (Fritjof Capra, 2016).

??????????? From the beginning of man’s life on Earth, every invention and discovery he had made to ease life was about subduing nature for his benefit. Deep ecology increases the meaning of the principle of letting the being be while trying to bring ecological consciousness to a higher level and achieve a healthier ecological life (Mija? et al., 2022). Mixing the ecology and the system, the ecosystem as an organizing principle allows one to think about the behavior of organized groups of organisms. It foregrounds an idea of stability and equilibrium. Ecosystem as concept has proved to be a powerful tool. In addition to fostering a relational and contextual understanding of the natural world, it brings an organicist conception of nature, via science, into popular discourse about the environment.

??????????? Understanding the humans as a part of the nature living systems, gives us an idea of our participation within the network and a conscious of shared spaces without hierarchies, this implies a change in the anthropocentric idea of the human in the center of all the life, seeing this one above or apart from nature, as the source of all value, and gives it a value only instrumental, "of use", to an ecocentrism idea that does not separate to humans - or anything else - from the natural environment. See the world, not as a collection of isolated objects, but as a network of fundamentally interconnected and interdependent phenomena (Fritjof Capra, 1996).

??????????? Following this idea, the concept of ecosystem services, which are the Goods which mankind receives from the natural environment that contribute to the survival and well-being of people directly or indirectly (Washington et al., 2017), could evolves a deep understanding of nature as an integrative system that include us. Is for this reason that services and benefits are synonymous. We maintain that nature and life on Earth are inherently good. As Washington et al. (2017) mentions, Nature has intrinsic value, irrespective of whether humans are the ones valuing it. It is true that, as far as we know at present, we humans are the only species that reflects on and applies moral values.

The Meaning of Nature

??????????? Discussing the essence of Nature, while acknowledging humanity's intrinsic connection to it, inevitably reveals a dichotomy between the natural realm and the artificial. The latter, crafted by human hands to serve aims and desires, contrasts starkly with the spontaneity of natural phenomena (Kotusev, 2018). Artificial objects are purpose-driven creations, distinct from the organic processes governing nature. However, if humans are integral parts of nature, does this imply that the artificial realm is also interconnected with the natural network? This apparent contradiction prompts reflection from an ecocentric standpoint. While everything in the artificial realm is human-made and goal-oriented, it remains constrained by the laws of nature. In contrast, the natural world, as Kotusev (2018) suggests, unfolds according to its own enigmatic principles, devoid of human-centric intentions. This perspective challenges anthropocentrism, emphasizing nature's autonomy and redirecting our understanding of humanity's place within it.

??????????? Human activities exert a profound influence on the Earth's landscape, significantly reshaping its ecosystems. Vitousek et al. (as cited in Glaser et al., 2021) aptly highlight that our impact on the planet often outpaces our comprehension of it, a phenomenon encapsulated by Paul Crutzen's concept of the Anthropocene. This epoch, characterized by humanity's dominant influence on Earth's systems, underscores the inseparable link between society and nature. In the Anthropocene, understanding one necessitates an understanding of the other; society cannot be comprehended in isolation from nature, and vice versa (Glaser et al., 2021). This recognition emphasizes the interconnectedness between human civilization and the natural world, urging a holistic approach to environmental stewardship and societal development.

Our Connection to Nature

??????????? This topic underscores the critical relationship between humans and nature, prompting a deeper understanding of human-nature interactions. These interactions, often referred to as human-nature interactions, have garnered increasing attention due to their significant implications for human health, well-being, and biodiversity conservation. Research indicates that these interactions not only influence individuals' attitudes and behaviors towards nature but also impact the future trajectory of biodiversity (Nisbet et al., 2009). Moreover, the disconnect from the natural world may exacerbate the degradation of our planet, further contributing to environmental destruction.

??????????? Drawing upon evolutionary theory, Wilson (1984) contends that humans harbor an inherent inclination to connect with other living entities. This assertion forms the basis of the biophilia hypothesis, proposed by Kellert and Wilson (1993), which seeks to elucidate humanity's intrinsic desire to engage with the natural environment. Despite the relatively recent shift towards urban living, separating us from direct contact with nature, Kellert and Wilson suggest that our biological predisposition towards nature remains intact. This suggests that despite urbanization, our evolutionary heritage still influences our perception of and affinity for the natural world (Nisbet et al., 2009).

??????????? The understanding of our interconnectedness with the Earth and our sense of belonging to nature is often encapsulated by the concept of ecological identity or ecological self, a term introduced by Arne Naess in 1973. An ecological identity encompasses not only the individual self but also the broader human and nonhuman communities, as well as the planet's ecosystems. In this framework, harm inflicted upon the environment is perceived as damage to oneself (Nisbet et al., 2009). Nature's interconnectedness fosters a deep appreciation and reverence for all forms of life, surpassing any utilitarian exploitation of nature for human ends. However, it's crucial to recognize that the nature of this connectedness varies among individuals, as it is a subjective and multifaceted construct influenced by personal, social, cognitive, affective, experiential, and personality factors. Together, these elements contribute to the formation of an individual's connection with nature.

Conclusion

??????????? In essence, the nature of Nature is intricately woven into the fabric of life, defining the interconnectedness that shapes our existence. As humans, it is incumbent upon us to recognize and honor our place within this intricate web, both complementing and being complemented by its vast network. However, it's crucial to acknowledge that the artificial world often exists outside of this natural network, lacking integration into the ecosystems that comprise us. This disconnection highlights the imperative for introspection, as our health and well-being are intimately tied to the broader web of life and its interconnectedness.

??????????? James Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis presents a transformative perspective, portraying Earth as a living system where organisms and their environment synergistically sustain life. Fritjof Capra's insights further illuminate this interconnectedness, emphasizing the prevalence of networks in understanding natural systems at all scales. These perspectives challenge anthropocentrism, advocating for a shift towards ecocentrism and recognizing humanity's integral role within the broader network of life. In the epoch of the Anthropocene, characterized by humanity's profound influence on Earth's systems, a holistic approach to societal and environmental stewardship becomes imperative.

??????????? Arne Naess's concept of ecological identity underscores the inherent connection between individuals, communities, and ecosystems, fostering a profound reverence for nature. As we navigate the complexities of our relationship with the Earth, it is essential to acknowledge and nurture our interconnectedness with nature. By aligning our actions with the principle of life and encouraging harmony within the natural world, we make the way towards a sustainable future that benefits all living systems.

References

Barnes MR, Donahue ML, Keeler BL, Shorb CM, Mohtadi TZ and Shelby LJ (2019) Characterizing. Ducarme, F., & Couvet, D. (2020). What does 'nature' mean? Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0390-y

Capra, F. (2021). Patterns of Connection: Essential Essays from Five Decades. High Road Books.

Capra, F. (2016, February 3). Fritjof Capra on Science and Spirituality. Science and Nonduality. https://scienceandnonduality.com/article/fritjof-capra-on-science-and-spirituality/

Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. Anchor Books. ISBN: 9780385476768

Glaser, M., Krause, G., Ratter, B. M. W., & Welp, M. (Eds.). (2012). Human-Nature Interactions in the Anthropocene: Potentials of Social-Ecological Systems Analysis (1st ed.). Routledge Studies in Environment, Culture, and Society Series. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148841

Keenan, B. (2022, January 10). Niklas Luhmann: What is Autopoiesis? Critical Legal Thinking. https://criticallegalthinking.com/2022/01/10/niklas-luhmann-what-is-autopoiesis/#:~:text=KEY%20CONCEPT,to%20reproduce%20and%20organise%20themselves

Kotusev, S. (2018). Enterprise Architecture: The Realms of Natural and Artificial. British Computer Society. Retrieved from https://www.bcs.org/content/conWebDoc/59909

Nature and Participant Experience in Studies of Nature Exposure for Positive Mental Health: An Integrative Review. Front. Psychol. 9:2617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02617

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals’ Connection with Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748

Peter C. van Wyck. (1997). Primitives in the Wilderness: Deep Ecology and the Missing Human Subject. SUNY Press.

Reichle, D. E. (2020). The Global Carbon Cycle and Climate Change: Scaling Ecological Energetics from Organism to the Biosphere (Chapter 2 - The physical and chemical bases of energy, pp. 5-14). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820244-9.00002-0

Washington H, Taylor B, Kopnina H, Cryer P and Piccolo JJ (2017) Why ecocentrism is the key pathway to sustainability. The Ecological Citizen 1: 35–41