NATIVE VS CROSS-PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT: WHAT TO CHOOSE? | WEBMEDIA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2025

In 2025, mobile apps remain a critical tool for businesses: 57% of internet traffic is generated through them, and mobile market revenues have surpassed $500 billion. However, the choice between native and cross-platform development has become more complex due to advancements in technology and the emergence of new frameworks. For instance, Kotlin Multiplatform Mobile (KMM) and Flutter 4.0 have narrowed the performance gap between the two approaches, while AR/VR and AI integration have become standard for many apps. The goal of this article is to help businesses consider key factors and choose the optimal development path.

1. What is Native and Cross-Platform Development?

Native Development

Native development involves creating apps specifically for a particular operating system, such as iOS or Android. For iOS, developers use Swift and Xcode, while for Android, they use Kotlin and Android Studio. This approach provides full access to all device features, including the camera, sensors, ARCore (for Android), and ARKit (for iOS). This makes native apps the ideal choice for projects where maximum performance and deep integration with the operating system are crucial.

Advantages of Native Development:

1. Maximum Performance. Native apps run faster and more smoothly, especially for resource-intensive tasks like gaming, AR/VR, or complex animations. For example, apps like Pokémon GO or high-load banking services (such as Sberbank or Tinkoff) use native development to ensure seamless performance even on low-end devices.
2. Better OS Integration. Native apps can leverage all the capabilities of the operating system, including Face ID, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and other features that are either unavailable or limited in cross-platform solutions. This is particularly important for apps where security is critical, such as in fintech or corporate solutions.
3. High Level of Security. Native apps are easier to secure against vulnerabilities, as they use standard tools and APIs provided by Apple and Google. This makes them the preferred choice for projects where user data protection is a priority.

Disadvantages of Native Development:

1. High Cost. Native app development is 30–40% more expensive than cross-platform development, as it requires creating two separate codebases for iOS and Android. This not only increases the budget but also extends development time to an average of 4–12 months.
2. Complex Maintenance. Two codebases mean that any changes or updates need to be implemented twice. This can be a challenge for small teams or startups looking to adapt quickly to market changes.

Cross-Platform Development

Cross-platform development is an approach where an app is built using a single codebase, which is then adapted for different platforms (iOS, Android, web, and even desktop). In 2025, the most popular tools for this are Flutter (Dart), React Native (JavaScript), and Kotlin Multiplatform (KMM). These technologies allow developers to write code once and run it on multiple platforms, significantly saving time and budget.

Advantages of Cross-Platform Development:

1. Cost and Time Efficiency. Thanks to a single codebase, cross-platform apps are developed faster and at a lower cost. For example, creating an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) can take just 2–4 months, with costs 30–40% lower than native solutions. This makes cross-platform development ideal for startups and small businesses.
2. Flexibility. Cross-platform frameworks like Flutter and React Native allow developers to create apps not only for iOS and Android but also for web and desktop platforms. This is particularly useful for projects aiming to reach the widest possible audience.
3. Quick MVP Launch. If you need to test a hypothesis or enter the market with minimal investment, cross-platform development is the way to go. For instance, food delivery apps or news aggregators often use this approach to quickly gain traction.

Disadvantages of Cross-Platform Development:

1. Limited Access to Device Features. Although cross-platform frameworks are constantly evolving, they still lag behind native solutions in accessing certain device features, such as NFC or advanced biometrics. This can be a challenge for apps requiring deep hardware integration.
2. Performance. Cross-platform apps can be 15–20% slower than native ones, especially for resource-intensive tasks like graphics processing or AR/VR. However, by 2025, this gap has significantly narrowed thanks to improvements in Flutter and Kotlin Multiplatform.

2. Factors for Businesses to Consider in 2025

2.1. Goals and Audience

The first and most important factor is the goals of your project and your target audience. Who are you building the app for? What problems should it solve? The answers to these questions will help determine which approach is best.

Cross-Platform: If you're a startup or small business looking to enter the market quickly with minimal investment, cross-platform development is your best bet. It's ideal for creating MVPs to test hypotheses and gather user feedback. For example, food delivery apps, booking platforms, or online catalogs often use cross-platform development to quickly capture an audience.

Native: If you're a large company, such as a bank or corporation, where security, performance, and integration with modern technologies are critical, native development is the way to go. Native apps excel in tasks requiring high performance, such as AR/VR, complex animations, or AI algorithms. For instance, virtual fitting room apps or financial services where every millisecond counts opt for native development.

2.2. Budget and Timeline

Budget and timeline are two key parameters that influence the choice of approach. In 2025, the difference in cost and development time between native and cross-platform solutions remains significant.

Cross-Platform: The average cost of developing an MVP using cross-platform technologies like Flutter or React Native is?20–50k, with timeline of 2–4 months.This makes cross?platform development ideal for projects with limited budgets and tight deadlines.?

Native: Native development requires more resources. The cost of building an app for two platforms (iOS and Android) starts at $100k, with development timelines ranging from 6 to 12 months. This is justified for projects where maximum performance and integration with modern technologies like ARKit or ARCore are essential.

2.3. Technical Requirements

The technical requirements of your project are another critical factor. In 2025, apps are becoming increasingly complex, and the choice of approach depends on the features you want to implement.

Cross-Platform: Cross-platform solutions are great for integrating with cloud services and standard APIs. For example, if your app uses Firebase for data storage or Google Maps for navigation, cross-platform development can handle this with ease. However, there are limitations: working with Wear OS, smart devices, or advanced sensors can be challenging.

Native: Native apps provide full access to all device features, including Wear OS, Apple Watch, and IoT. If your project requires deep hardware integration, such as NFC or advanced biometrics, native development is the only option.

2.4. Long-Term Support

Long-term support is something many overlook when choosing an approach, but it's critical for the success of a project. In 2025, technology is evolving faster than ever, and your choice should consider not only current but also future needs.

Native Apps: Native apps are easier to scale and update thanks to stable SDKs from Apple and Google. This makes them an ideal choice for projects planning long-term growth and regular updates.

Cross-Platform: Cross-platform solutions depend on frameworks that may become outdated or lose support. For example, in 2024, Microsoft discontinued support for Xamarin, causing issues for many projects. However, frameworks like Flutter and Kotlin Multiplatform are actively evolving and remain reliable options in 2025.

2.5. Trends in 2025

Technology never stands still, and in 2025, several trends are shaping the development landscape:

1. Growth of Low-Code/No-Code Platforms. These tools allow for rapid prototyping and even full-fledged app development without deep programming knowledge. They're ideal for startups and small businesses looking to test ideas quickly.
2. Rise of Kotlin Multiplatform Mobile (KMM). KMM is gaining traction in the corporate world due to its ability to combine business logic with native UI. This makes it an excellent choice for projects looking to save time without sacrificing performance.
3. Progressive Web Apps (PWAs). PWAs continue to grow in popularity as an alternative to traditional apps. They allow businesses to bypass the restrictions of app stores, making them attractive for projects looking to enter the market quickly.

3. WebMedia Recommendations

At WebMedia, we understand that choosing between native and cross-platform development isn't just a technical decision—it's a strategic one that impacts the success of your project. Based on our experience and analysis of the 2025 market, we've prepared recommendations to help you make the right choice.

Choose Native Development If:

1. Your Project Requires AR/VR or Complex Animations. If you're building an app with augmented reality, virtual fitting rooms, or interactive 3D elements, native development is the only way to go. For example, apps like Pokémon GO or IKEA Place use native code for maximum performance and integration with ARKit and ARCore.
2. Your Budget Allows for Long-Term Investment. Native development requires more resources, but it pays off for projects planning long-term growth. For instance, banking apps like Sberbank or Tinkoff choose native development to ensure top-tier security and performance.
3. Deep Integration with Modern Technologies is Critical. If your project requires NFC, advanced biometrics, or smart device integration (e.g., Apple Watch or Wear OS), native development provides full access to all device features.

Choose Cross-Platform Development If:

1. You Need a Quick MVP Launch. If you're a startup or small business looking to test a hypothesis and enter the market quickly, cross-platform development is ideal. For example, food delivery apps or booking platforms often use Flutter or React Native to reduce development time to 2–4 months.
2. Your App Doesn't Require Deep Hardware Integration. If your project is limited to basic functionality like catalogs, booking, or news feeds, cross-platform development can save you time and money. For instance, news aggregators or hotel booking apps often choose this path.
3. You Want to Cover Multiple Platforms with Minimal Effort. Cross-platform frameworks like Flutter and Kotlin Multiplatform allow you to develop apps for iOS, Android, web, and even desktop using a single codebase. This is especially useful for projects aiming to reach a broad audience.

4. Examples of Popular Apps

To better understand which approach suits your project, let's look at examples of popular apps that use native and cross-platform development.

Native Apps:

1. Banking Apps (Sberbank, Tinkoff) These apps use Swift (for iOS) and Kotlin (for Android) to ensure top-tier security and performance. They support biometric authentication, NFC payments, and other features critical for fintech.
2. Pokémon GO This app is a prime example of native development for AR projects. It uses ARKit and ARCore to create an immersive experience that wouldn't be possible with cross-platform technologies.
3. Spotify Spotify uses native code for deep integration with iOS and Android. This allows the app to run in the background, support voice commands, and deliver smooth streaming even on low-end devices.

Cross-Platform Apps:

1. Google Pay Google Pay uses Flutter to create a unified interface across all platforms. This enables the company to update the app quickly and maintain it on iOS, Android, and the web.
2. Instagram Instagram actively uses React Native to roll out new features quickly. This allows the company to test new functionalities and adapt to market changes rapidly.
3. Alibaba Alibaba uses a hybrid approach, combining Kotlin Multiplatform for business logic and native UI for maximum performance. This allows the company to save development time without compromising quality.

5. How to Make the Right Decision?

Choosing between native and cross-platform development is a complex process that requires careful analysis. Here are some steps to help you make the right decision:

1. Audience Analysis: Determine which platform your target audience prefers. For example, if 71% of your users are on Android and 28% are on iOS, this may influence your choice.
2. Feature Assessment: List the key features of your app. Do you need NFC, ARKit, or advanced biometrics? If yes, native development is the way to go.
3. Framework Comparison: If you opt for cross-platform development, compare available frameworks. Flutter is great for animations and customization, while Kotlin Multiplatform excels in business logic with native UI.
4. Scalability Plan: Consider long-term prospects. If you plan to scale your app or add complex features in the future, native development may be more cost-effective. Transitioning from cross-platform to native can be expensive and time-consuming.

Conclusion

In 2025, the choice between native and cross-platform development remains relevant and challenging. Native apps offer maximum performance and integration with modern technologies but require more resources. Cross-platform solutions save time and budget but may lag in performance and access to device features.

If you're still unsure which approach to choose, reach out to WebMedia's experts. We'll conduct a detailed analysis of your project and propose the optimal solution to help you achieve your goals.

Contact Us

Your success starts with the right choice. Trust the professionals!