A National CRO
Carol M. Highsmith

A National CRO

Last week the President signed the re-authorization of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) of 2002, begging the question whether a siloed risk transfer approach is the most effective strategy for national risks borne by taxpayers. TRIA was first designed to shore up the insurance industry, which suffered large property, casualty and life losses due to the terrorist attack on 9/11. Additional losses were borne by the airline industry and many other sectors, which never anticipated such a large scale event. Thus, without the Federal backstop, which is ultimately borne by taxpayers, risk appetite for these exposures would have dwindled, especially in light of the massive litigation that followed 9/11 and continues to this day.

There is an inherent strength and weakness in a federated system like the United States. In part, strength is gained through the principle that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. At the same time when the “whole” cannot operate as one because of disagreement among its constituent parts, cracks begin to emerge in the edifice. Such cracks are revealed by the absence of a national enterprise risk management strategy. A “we’ll deal with it when it happens” approach does not make for sound policy or preparedness in the face of countless risks, from cyber warfare to terrorism and natural catastrophes. For one, there is no cabinet-level Chief Risk Officer (CRO) – with the occupant of the Oval Office being the closest proxy. The national CRO would be the person who bears overall accountability for the financial well being and resilience of the nation following acute or attritional losses, wherever they arise, regardless of the cause. Critically, this function would serve as the risk champion of the Federal Government coordinating and aggregating existing risk resources, such as TRIA, FEMA, natural catastrophe pools (e.g. flood insurance) among others. In effect, the CRO would have oversight over a national risk-bearing pool cutting across all risk domains that are ultimately paid for by taxpayers reducing the average cost.

The vital role of coordination among response agencies, such as DHS, oversight agencies such as the GAO and OMB, and financial agencies, like the Treasury and FDIC, would lead to better alignment and stewardship of taxpayer risk-bearing. The premise is that rather than dealing with national risks ad hoc, like TRIA does, long term risk-bearing capabilities would be established. Removing this national risk strategy from electoral politics, which held TRIA’s re-authorization hostage and saw special interests being baked into the legislation, would create a more robust and lower cost risk financing solution. Over time, coaxing the participation of the capital markets through insurance-linked securities and government backed catastrophe bonds covering man-made and natural perils will improve overall resilience and liquidity. Institutional investors are attracted to catastrophe bonds as their returns are uncorrelated to the business cycle. A U.S. Government backed program of this nature would not only have the allure of a ‘flight to quality,’ it would benefit from the implied backstop afforded by the Treasury across systemic institutions and programs.

Following large-scale losses or economic duress, the U.S. has traditionally followed the Keynesian school of thought, whereby deficit or reconstruction spending helps fill the economic void and restart the engine. Thus far the record has favored Keynes, however, largely at the expense of the nation’s debt, which has reached perilously high levels – stoking a sovereign debt crisis and the loss the coveted AAA credit rating. An aggregate national risk pool, by contrast, will lower the average cost of risk to the taxpayer and break the pattern of treating risk-financing like a surprise event. Risk by definition is a surprise event, that the U.S. (like all other nations) will have deal with the economic consequences of large-scale losses should not be. Therefore a national risk pool that cuts across all risk domains and shores up private sector risk appetite will enhance national security.

In the wake of TRIA’s re-authorization, which carries this important Act to the year 2020, it begs the question whether the nation’s terrorism risk will somehow diminish by that date? Given that the risk of terrorism, which is now successfully targeting our information infrastructure and firms is perennial, our financial solutions to absorb these risks should have similar staying power and adaptability. Under the oversight of a cabinet-level CRO who can harness the power of the capital markets to absorb risk and coordinate a whole of government response, the U.S. will be better prepared to absorb unforeseen shocks.

Dante Disparte is the founder and CEO of Risk Cooperative a specialized strategy, risk and capital management firm located in Washington, DC. He is the resident expert on risk and economic competitiveness at the American Security Project, a member of the influential Consensus for American Security and a founding member of the Business Council for American Security.

Oliver Thornton FCCA

Portfolio Finance Director at The FD & CFO Centre

10 年

I am not clear from this piece whether 'borne by taxpayers' means paid for by taxes or paid ultimately by individuals through premiums. That aside there is a lot to be said for government standing behind commercially managed risk pools where their absence becomes a serious impediment to a functioning economy. I really do think it is an absolute last resort though for two reasons. Firstly its a contingent liability or a form of off balance sheet financing. Since government financial reporting has nothing like the same rigour as that they impose on commercial reporting the principal can be used for short term political opportunism without hitting the current government's PSBR. Secondly how far do you extend the principle? For example if you are involved in construction in France, the weather is underwritten by a government instituted pooled fund. Life is inherently risky, its just not the role of government to change that.

George Molakal

Chief Executive Officer, Author, Investor, Global AI Leader, Keynote Speaker and Director in many Boards

10 年

Good review

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dante A. Disparte的更多文章

  • Foreword - 2024 Circle's Global Impact Report

    Foreword - 2024 Circle's Global Impact Report

    Animated by our mission of raising global economic prosperity through the frictionless exchange of value, at Circle we…

    6 条评论
  • Founder Mode is a Fad, Owner Mode is Forever

    Founder Mode is a Fad, Owner Mode is Forever

    Outside of the tech world, the hype surrounding “founder mode” may not be widely known - least with our collective…

    25 条评论
  • In a Battle Between Crypto and Banking, Convergence is the Winner

    In a Battle Between Crypto and Banking, Convergence is the Winner

    At this year's Singapore FinTech Festival, ostensibly the world's leading fintech event with more than 65,000…

    12 条评论
  • To Blockchain Or Not To Blockchain

    To Blockchain Or Not To Blockchain

    Many would argue that the enthusiasm for blockchain and cryptocurrency is waning. Indeed, according to Gartner’s hype…

    4 条评论
  • While Data May Be Worth Trillions, It Is Not The New Oil

    While Data May Be Worth Trillions, It Is Not The New Oil

    Just because today’s tech titans are the new robber barons, does not mean data is the new oil. This oft made comparison…

    2 条评论
  • Coming Soon To A City Near You - $320 Billion In Economic Losses

    Coming Soon To A City Near You - $320 Billion In Economic Losses

    First launched in 2015, an update to the Lloyd’s City Risk Index, a collaborative effort with the Centre for Risk…

  • A Fond Farewell To HBS

    A Fond Farewell To HBS

    My Fellow HBS Alumni, Harvard Business School’s mission is to educate leaders who make a difference in the world…

    2 条评论
  • How to Stop Puerto Rico’s Death Spiral

    How to Stop Puerto Rico’s Death Spiral

    Long before Hurricanes Irma and Maria delivered their knockout blow to Puerto Rico and many islands in the Caribbean…

  • What is Your Default Setting?

    What is Your Default Setting?

    While we may not realize it, a mix of natural tendencies, social norms and codes of conduct give us an almost…

  • 24,000 Uber Drivers May Lose Their Side Hustle

    24,000 Uber Drivers May Lose Their Side Hustle

    Uber is truly a fascinating company. The 8-year-old firm is at once the source of strategy and business model…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了