The Myth vs. Reality of Reshoring: Are We Really Bringing Jobs Back?

Introduction

Reshoring—the process of bringing manufacturing operations back to the United States—has been a widely discussed strategy in recent years. Amid global supply chain disruptions, geopolitical tensions, and increasing calls for domestic job creation, U.S. manufacturers have been encouraged to move production closer to home. However, undertaking a reshoring initiative is complex.

Are we truly witnessing a large-scale return of manufacturing jobs to the U.S., or is this movement more symbolic than substantive? This article critically examines the data, challenges, and real-world outcomes of reshoring efforts, providing manufacturing executives with a fact-based perspective on the future of domestic production.

The Perception

Over the past few years, headlines have heralded a resurgence in American manufacturing. High-profile companies such as Apple, Intel, and Ford have announced plans to increase domestic production. According to the 2024 Kearney Reshoring Index, U.S. manufacturing imports from low-cost countries have decreased, while domestic production appears to be gaining traction.

Additionally, federal policies such as the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act have provided significant incentives for manufacturers to invest in U.S.-based production. The Biden administration has touted reshoring as a key driver of economic growth and national security.

However, while reshoring announcements may be on the rise, the execution of these plans—and their impact on employment—tells a different story.

The Reality: Reshoring Is More Complicated Than It Seems

Despite the political and media enthusiasm, real-world data suggests that reshoring is neither as widespread nor as beneficial as commonly portrayed.

1. Manufacturing Job Growth Has Been Modest

While manufacturing job numbers have increased in certain sectors, the overall impact of reshoring on employment has been limited. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, manufacturing employment in 2024 remains below pre-2000 levels, even with significant reshoring efforts.

For example, Apple’s decision to assemble some Mac products in Texas was a symbolic win for U.S. manufacturing. However, the majority of Apple’s supply chain—including components for its iPhones—remains firmly entrenched in Asia.

Similarly, Intel’s $20 billion investment in Ohio for semiconductor production is a promising development. However, such projects take years to materialize and often rely heavily on automation, meaning fewer jobs than traditional manufacturing facilities.

2. Automation Reduces the Need for Labor

One of the biggest misconceptions about reshoring is that it will create a large number of jobs. The reality is that many reshored facilities are highly automated, significantly reducing the need for human labor.

For example, Tesla’s Gigafactories and Foxconn’s Wisconsin project have invested heavily in robotics and AI-driven manufacturing. While these facilities bring production to U.S. soil, they do not create the same volume of blue-collar jobs that traditional manufacturing plants once did.

3. Costs and Supply Chain Challenges Persist

While reshoring reduces reliance on global supply chains, it introduces new cost challenges:

• Higher Labor Costs: U.S. wages are significantly higher than those in China, Mexico, and Southeast Asia, making domestic production less cost-effective.
• Raw Material Dependencies: Many critical raw materials, such as rare earth elements used in electronics and batteries, are still sourced from foreign suppliers, particularly China.
• Infrastructure Limitations: The U.S. lacks the manufacturing infrastructure that Asia has built over decades, leading to logistical inefficiencies.

4. Selective Reshoring: Some Industries Benefit, Others Struggle

Certain industries—such as semiconductors, electric vehicles, and defense-related manufacturing—are seeing real reshoring gains due to government incentives and national security concerns. However, for consumer goods, textiles, and electronics, reshoring remains economically unviable.

For example:

• Samsung and TSMC are building chip plants in Texas and Arizona due to government support.
• Ford and GM are increasing domestic battery production for electric vehicles.
• Apparel and consumer electronics production, however, remains largely offshore.

Long-Term Sustainability: Can Reshoring Survive Without Government Support?

A crucial question for manufacturing executives is whether reshoring efforts can be sustained without continuous government intervention. Many current reshoring initiatives rely on federal subsidies, tax credits, and protectionist trade policies such as tariffs on Chinese imports.

However, history has shown that once these incentives expire, companies often return to more cost-effective offshore manufacturing. For example, after initial excitement around Foxconn’s investment in Wisconsin, the company scaled back its promised factory jobs significantly when subsidies were reduced.

To ensure long-term success, U.S. manufacturers must address key factors:

• Investment in Workforce Training: Without a skilled workforce, reshoring will struggle to scale.
• Innovation in Cost Reduction: Companies must explore automation and lean manufacturing strategies that balance efficiency with job creation.
• Regionalized Supply Chains: Nearshoring to Mexico and Canada may provide a hybrid approach that balances cost and proximity benefits.

Conclusion: Reshoring Needs Realistic Expectations

While reshoring is a promising trend, it is not the silver bullet as many might think. The reality is that U.S. manufacturing still faces high costs, labor shortages, and global supply chain dependencies that make full-scale reshoring challenging.

For manufacturing executives, the key takeaway is to approach reshoring strategically rather than emotionally. Companies should weigh the benefits of domestic production against economic realities and consider hybrid solutions such as nearshoring or automation-driven reshoring.

Ultimately, reshoring efforts must be pragmatic, data-driven, and adaptable—not just a political talking point.

Further Research and Resources

For executives looking to delve deeper into reshoring trends and strategies, the following resources provide valuable insights:

1. 2024 Kearney Reshoring Index – A comprehensive analysis of reshoring trends and their economic impact.
2. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Annual Report on U.S. Manufacturing – A detailed statistical review of U.S. manufacturing.
3. Forbes: The Resurgence of U.S. Manufacturing – Insights into why certain sectors are benefiting from reshoring.
4. U.S. Manufacturers Reshoring, But It Will Take A Long Time – A critical perspective on the long-term viability of reshoring.

By staying informed and leveraging data-driven strategies, manufacturing executives can make smarter, more sustainable reshoring decisions that align with long-term business goals.

Get a Free Reshoring Strategic Session

Global supply chain disruptions, rising tariffs, and unpredictable logistics are driving manufacturers to rethink their sourcing strategies.

Strategic Value+ Solutions (SVS) helps manufacturing executives like you consider whether reshoring your operations aligns with your company's long-term interests. Our expert team specializes in supplier diversification, cost analysis, and process optimization to ensure a well-conceived transition to U.S.-based production. We also help companies unlock federal incentives, tax credits, and workforce grants, ameliorating the financial burden of reshoring.

Whether you’re looking to reduce risk, improve lead times, or future-proof your supply chain, SVS delivers data-driven solutions that maximize efficiency and profitability. Let’s build your manufacturing company for strength and resilience.

Schedule a free consultation today at https://strategicvalueplus.com/contact or email [email protected].

Join the Strategic Value+ Solutions Collaborative for the Free U.S. Manufacturing Webinar Event Featuring Harry Moser

Your hosts are Brian McCollough - MBA, CEPA?, CMAA? , Maria L. Perez , Ruoyu Loughry . Roy Dickan , Mike Liu , William Feder , Bill Schweber , Justice Darko, PMP , Steven Shrinsky and Nelinia (Nel) Varenas, MBA

Our guest speaker is the distinguished Founder and President of The RESHORING INITIATIVE, Harry Moser. This timely and high-powered webinar will be live streaming Wednesday, March 19th, 11am PST to 12pm PST. Learn more and register for the U.S. Manufacturing Nexus Webinar Event by clicking here: https://strategicvalueplus.com/webinar-registration .

"Why Reshoring Matters for Our Economy and Our National Security" with Harry Moser, Founder and President of The Reshoring Initiative

RESHORING INITIATIVE Harry Moser #reshorinigmanufacturing #sourcingdomestically #supplychaindisruption #supplychainresilience