The Myth of the Heroic Leader

The Myth of the Heroic Leader

We love leaders. We idolize them, blame them, and expect them to save the day. This obsession with the heroic leader overlooks a critical truth: leadership is not a solo act.

As Teddy Roosevelt said, "The credit belongs to the [one] who is actually in the arena..." Leadership is an active, often messy struggle. No leader succeeds alone.

Yet we perpetuate the myth of the lone hero leader. When companies falter, we blame the CEO. When countries struggle, we blame the president. We act as if they alone determine success or failure.

In truth, leaders depend on their teams. Consider some of history's greatest leaders - where would they have ended up without their talented teams? Churchill without his wartime cabinet, Jobs without Wozniak, Phil Jackson without his Bulls.

This false narrative hurts leaders and teams alike. It pressures leaders to appear all-knowing and infallible. Even the best leaders make mistakes - the difference is they learn from them. Meanwhile, team members get overlooked, as we attribute results to the leader alone.

What drives this distorted view?

We crave simple explanations and compelling narratives. The bold hero leader makes for a better story than murky, complex realities. Our bias for action and accountability pushes us to personify good and bad outcomes in the leader.

But leadership doesn't reside in a single person. It emerges from teams of diverse individuals combining their talents and strengths.

Patrick Lencioni was right - cohesive teams drive organizational success. But most leaders chase individual glory, not team cohesion. Why? Building teams takes emotional effort and intelligence (EQ) - skills where many leaders falter. It's easier to treat employees like cogs in a machine, telling them what to do rather than showing them how.

To build better teams, we must rethink leadership. Leadership is not a person or position. It is a collective process of aligning strengths, coordinating effort, and unleashing potential in others. It each team member bringing their A-game to every engagement. It's each member deeply reflecting, finding humility, and an eagerness to learn and grow, evolve and adapt.

This starts with humility - recognizing leaders are human, flaws and all. Next, prioritizing cooperation over control, seeking first to understand, then identify each person's unique abilities.

This won't come from the top alone. Change may start in the middle or bottom. Wherever we sit, we can model collaborative leadership. Identify others' talents, find ways to nurture them, and coordinate our efforts toward shared goals. In this collective leadership approach, who gets credit matters less than the results. Our obsession with heroic leaders has caused dysfunction for too long. It's time to share leadership and build better teams. That's how we can all contribute to success.

Tim Hammonds

Sleepology Is My Philosophy

1 年

“There are NO Bad Teams….ONLY Bad LEADERS”~Jocko Willink

Shree Nanguneri

President and CEO, Millennium Global Business Solutions Inc. USA (Senior Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt)

1 年

Change never comes from the top, instead it is only sponsored and accepted there. Change comes from the bottom, middle or anywhere but the top from an action point of view. This is the phrase "Servant Leadership" is not applicable to people with authority, title, power to influence by rights and privileges afforded to them as these factors confound with their servant leadership even if they are truly humble. The only folks who can demonstrate true servant like leadership are those that influence someone above their pay grade as the latter cannot be authorized or forced to change by someone in the former category. This means influence your boss or supervisor to change for a value addition based outcome and maybe that is the closest way to eliminate the confounding as he listened to you even when he didn't have to from a pay grade PoV. Leadership should not be title baed or a single entity as it is a group kind of culture where it is not dependency, independency, instead interdependency.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

George Morris的更多文章

  • Abandonment Meetings

    Abandonment Meetings

    In 1907, Henry Ford took a step that shaped modern manufacturing forever, but it was more abrupt than myth would have…

  • Upgrading Your Business Growth Framework from EOS to Scaling Up

    Upgrading Your Business Growth Framework from EOS to Scaling Up

    Running a business is hard enough without using a framework that limits your growth. Imagine tackling a mountain trail…

    2 条评论
  • Closing Sparks > Moving to Soulful Scaling

    Closing Sparks > Moving to Soulful Scaling

    Hello Folks Thanks for following me with this newsletter project; however I’m looking at simplifying my output and I’ll…

  • Accelerate Decision-Making in Meetings

    Accelerate Decision-Making in Meetings

    In 1962, as the Cuban Missile Crisis unfolded, President John F. Kennedy faced the most critical decision of his…

  • Why Your Definition of Success is Probably Wrong

    Why Your Definition of Success is Probably Wrong

    Let's step back to Vienna, 1847, where a young doctor named Ignaz Semmelweis is grappling with a troubling mystery. In…

  • What's Your Worth?

    What's Your Worth?

    Imagine that you're dead broke, sleeping at a bus station, and you sell your beloved dog Butkus for $50 because you…

    2 条评论
  • Is the Pursuit of Productivity Steering Us Wrongly?

    Is the Pursuit of Productivity Steering Us Wrongly?

    In 1911, Frederick Winslow Taylor published "The Principles of Scientific Management," a manifesto that would shape the…

  • The Rigid or Fluid Road to Goals?

    The Rigid or Fluid Road to Goals?

    Society often mistakes unwavering determination for strength, clinging to goals with a death grip. But the truly…

  • Strategic Shrinkage (Not Growth)

    Strategic Shrinkage (Not Growth)

    I've always been fascinated by counterintuitive business strategies. You know, the ones that make you tilt your head…

  • Rethinking Loyalty to Employees as You Grow

    Rethinking Loyalty to Employees as You Grow

    In the summer of 1812, Napoleon Bonaparte stood at the pinnacle of his power. As he prepared to invade Russia, he faced…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了