Myth - Automation testing will solve all your QA problems
By Martin Sutcliffe , Iridium’s QA practice lead?
While automation is a potent QA tool, it is not a magic fix.?
However, by proactively addressing the following considerations, organisations can enhance the success of implementing new automation frameworks and streamline their QA functions effectively:?
Implementing a new automation framework often requires a significant initial investment in terms of time, resources, and training. Always start with a thorough cost-benefit analysis to justify the investment. Hidden costs, such as additional infrastructure requirements or unforeseen training needs, should be considered.?
Team members may face challenges adapting to the new framework, leading to productivity issues and delays. Provide comprehensive training programs to bridge the skill gap. Consider hiring external experts or allocating extra time for hands-on learning during the transition phase.?
The new automation framework may not be fully compatible with existing tools, technologies, or third-party integrations. Conduct thorough compatibility tests and ensure seamless integration with other tools, version control systems, and CI/CD pipelines to avoid disruptions.??
Overestimating the capabilities of the chosen framework can lead to unrealistic expectations and disappointment. Clearly define the capabilities and limitations of the automation framework. Set realistic goals and expectations to avoid project setbacks and maintain team morale.?
The chosen framework may struggle to scale efficiently as the number of test cases and scenarios increases. Conduct scalability tests to ensure the framework can handle the anticipated growth in the number of test cases. Implement parallel execution and optimised resource utilisation for scalability.?
领英推荐
Inadequate design and planning may result in a complex maintenance process, making it challenging to update or modify automated tests. Emphasise modular and maintainable code practices. Regularly review and refactor automation scripts to accommodate changes in the application without major overhauls.?
Over-reliance on specific individuals for framework implementation and maintenance may pose a risk if these key personnel leave the organisation. Promote knowledge sharing and documentation. Establish best practices to ensure that multiple team members are proficient in the automation framework, reducing dependency on specific individuals.?
Inaccurate test results, such as false positives or negatives, can erode confidence in the automation framework. Implement robust validation mechanisms and regularly review and update test scripts to account for changes in the application. Invest in effective debugging tools to quickly identify and address false results.?
Introducing a new automation framework may pose security vulnerabilities or non-compliance with industry standards. Conduct thorough security assessments and ensure the framework aligns with industry-specific compliance requirements. Implement security testing within the automation framework to identify and mitigate risks.?
Tools and frameworks can become obsolete or face discontinuation, leading to the need for a sudden switch. Regularly monitor the development and support status of the chosen framework. Have contingency plans in place, including the ability to migrate to a different tool if necessary.?
"Smart automation complements a well-structured QA process but won't replace the need for strategic planning, collaboration, and a skilled QA team. Don't fall for the hype. Automation is part of the puzzle, not the whole picture.”?
Read more from Martin on automation here: https://www.ir77.co.uk/blog/automation-automation-automation/
Contact [email protected] with any QA questions or requirements.