My meeting with Indologist, critical evaluator, and Bharatiya sanskriti defender, Rajiv Malhotra

It was my good fortune to have met Professor Rajiv Malhotra ji, author of many books including 'Snakes in the Ganga', 'Being Different', 'AI & The Future of Power' and 'Battle for Sanskrit' over the weekend of June 15 and 16 in Atlanta, GA, USA. (https://dcfusa.org/dda24/ ). The event was organized by Shrikant Palkar , founder and director of Dharma Civilization Foundation.

1. Rajiv Malhotra ji's "Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism" delves into the complexities of cultural understanding, particularly focusing on the relationship between Western and Dharmic traditions.

Reversing the Gaze:

·??????? Colonial Legacy: Malhotra ji argues that Western colonialism has left a deep mark. Western frameworks have dominated the study of India, leading to a one-sided understanding. He proposes "reversing the gaze," where India (representing Dharmic traditions) becomes the observer, critically examining the West from its own philosophical and spiritual perspective.

·??????? Decentering the West: This shift challenges the assumption of Western universality. Malhotra ji argues that Western thought is not the default standard, but rather one specific cultural perspective with its own strengths and weaknesses.

·??????? Benefits of Reversal: Reversing the gaze allows for a more balanced dialogue. It encourages Indians to reclaim their intellectual heritage and empowers a deeper understanding of the West on its own terms.

Dharmic vs. Abrahamic Traditions:

·??????? Family of Traditions: Malhotra ji argues that Dharmic traditions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, etc.) share a core set of beliefs and practices, forming a "family" distinct from Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam).

·??????? Focus on Self-Realization: Dharmic traditions emphasize self-realization through individual effort and exploration. Liberation (moksha) is the ultimate goal, achieved through various spiritual paths.

·??????? Eternal Truth vs. Historical Revelation: Dharmic traditions view truth as eternal and multifaceted, accessible through different perspectives. Abrahamic religions emphasize a specific historical revelation, often associated with a single prophet or holy book.

·??????? Cyclical vs. Linear Time: Dharmic traditions see time as cyclical, with concepts like karma and reincarnation. Abrahamic religions typically view time as linear, leading towards a singular end point.

Critique of Western Universalism:

·??????? Imposing Values: Malhotra ji critiques the idea that Western values like democracy, individualism, and secularism are universally applicable. He argues that these values may not fit all cultures and could be detrimental if imposed.

·??????? Reductionist Translations: He criticizes the tendency to translate Dharmic concepts into Western frameworks, leading to misunderstandings. For example, translating "dharma" simply as "duty" loses its rich meaning encompassing purpose, ethics, and right action.

·??????? The Importance of Context: The book emphasizes the importance of understanding ideas within their cultural context. Western interpretations of Dharmic traditions often miss the nuances and richness of the original concepts.

·??????? Multi-civilizational Worldview: Malhotra ji argues for a multi-civilizational world view. Each civilization has its own unique contributions to humanity, and fostering dialogue and mutual respect is key to a more harmonious world.

Beyond Critique: Building Bridges:

·??????? Beyond Victimhood: "Being Different" doesn't advocate for cultural victimhood. Instead, it encourages Indians to reclaim their intellectual heritage and engage in a confident dialogue with the West.

·??????? Learning from Each Other: Both Western and Dharmic traditions have valuable insights to offer. The book encourages a cross-cultural exchange of ideas, fostering a more holistic understanding of the human experience.

·??????? The Role of Modernity: Malhotra ji acknowledges the influence of modernity on Dharmic societies. The book explores how Dharmic traditions can adapt and evolve while retaining their core values.

·??????? A Call for Action: "Being Different" is a call for a more respectful and nuanced approach to intercultural understanding. It encourages readers to move beyond stereotypes and engage in genuine dialogue across cultural boundaries.

2. Rajiv Malhotra ji's "Snakes in the Ganga" delves into a critical analysis of what he perceives as threats to the integrity and future of Indian civilization. The book utilizes a metaphorical approach, comparing the holy river Ganga to Indian civilization, and the "snakes" within it to insidious forces that threaten its purity and well-being.

The Metaphor and the Perceived Threat:

·??????? Hidden Dangers: The title "Snakes in the Ganga" establishes the central metaphor. The Ganga, revered as a sacred river in Hinduism, represents the essence of Indian civilization, encompassing its cultural heritage, social fabric, and spiritual core. The "snakes" lurking within symbolize hidden dangers that threaten to disrupt its harmony and integrity.

·??????? A Global Machinery: Malhotra ji argues that these dangers aren't isolated incidents but rather a part of a well-orchestrated global movement with a specific agenda. He identifies Critical Social Justice (CSJ) theories, particularly Critical Race Theory (CRT), as a key threat. The book outlines how these ideologies, often originating in Western academia, are seen as infiltrating Indian institutions and intellectual discourse.

·??????? Deconstructing the Metaphor: Critics of the book argue that the metaphor itself is overly simplistic. They point out that Indian civilization is a complex and dynamic entity, not a monolithic whole. Additionally, some argue that the book fails to acknowledge existing internal debates and criticisms within Indian society regarding issues like caste and social justice.

Mapping CRT onto India: A Contentious Exercise:

·??????? Marxism's Reincarnation?: The book posits that CRT, with its focus on race and identity politics, is a reincarnation of Marxist ideology. Malhotra ji argues that applying this framework to India creates a false equivalence. He contends that the historical and social contexts of caste differ significantly from racial hierarchies in the West.

·??????? Caste vs. Race: A Complex Distinction: The book argues that caste, a complex social stratification system in India, cannot be simply equated with race. While acknowledging the problematic aspects of caste, it emphasizes its historical evolution within the Indian social order. Critics argue that this distinction downplays the discriminatory nature of caste and its continuing impact on Indian society.

·??????? Manufacturing Division: Malhotra ji raises concerns about how applying CRT creates divisions within Indian society. He argues that framing social issues through a race-based lens pits marginalized communities against upper castes, potentially weakening national unity. Critics counter that this ignores the legitimate grievances of marginalized groups and the need for structural changes to address social inequalities.

The Woke Movement and its Targets: Deciphering the Agenda:

·??????? Dismantling India?: The book portrays the "Woke" movement, a term used to describe progressive activism focused on identity politics, as aiming to dismantle Indian civilization. It claims that this movement seeks to undermine traditional values, cultural practices, and social hierarchies.

·??????? Targets of the Movement: The book identifies various institutions as targets for the "Woke" agenda, including government, education (universities and curriculum), culture (arts, media, and religion), industry (business practices and affirmative action), and society (everyday interactions and social norms).

·??????? Ground Zero: Harvard University: Malhotra ji argues that institutions like Harvard University are at the center of this movement. He posits that these institutions train Indian scholars who then return to India and spread these ideologies through academia and activism. Critics argue that this view oversimplifies intellectual exchange and ignores the contributions of Indian scholars to critical thought.

Funding the "Snakes" and the Source of Influence:

·??????? Indian Funding, Global Agenda: The book claims that some Indian funding supports scholars and activists promoting CSJ theories. It raises questions about the rationale behind such funding, suggesting a disconnect between the supposed goals of social justice and the potential effects on Indian culture.

·??????? Capitalists and Neo-Marxism: An intriguing point raised by the book is the potential alignment of some capitalists with CSJ theories. The book questions why some capitalists might indirectly support ideologies seen as critical of capitalism itself. It suggests a more complex interplay between economic interests and social movements.

·??????? Western Influence and Internal Debates: Critics argue that the book overemphasizes the influence of Western academia and overlooks internal debates within India on issues like caste and social justice. They maintain that Indian intellectuals and activists are critically engaging with these issues without simply transplanting Western frameworks.

3. Rajiv Malhotra ji's "The Battle for Sanskrit" delves into a crucial debate about the future of the ancient Indian language and its role in contemporary India. The book centers around a perceived "battle" for the interpretation and understanding of Sanskrit, particularly within the context of Indology, the academic field dedicated to studying India's languages, literature, and history.

A New Awakening: Challenging Westernized Discourse:

·??????? Shifting the Narrative: Malhotra ji argues that a "new awakening" is taking place in India, challenging the ongoing Westernization of the discourse about Indian culture and traditions. This discourse, often dominated by Western scholars and Indology departments in Western universities, is perceived as overlooking or misconstruing the essence of Sanskrit and its significance.

·??????? The Centrality of Sanskrit: The book emphasizes the centrality of Sanskrit to Indian civilization. It highlights Sanskrit's role as the language of ancient Indian literature, philosophy, science, and religious texts. Malhotra ji argues that understanding Sanskrit is essential for a deeper understanding of Hinduism and other Dharmic traditions.

·??????? Critique of Westernized Indology: Malhotra ji critiques some approaches within Indology that view Sanskrit primarily through a social or political lens. He argues that these approaches often focus on highlighting supposed social inequalities and power structures within ancient Indian texts, potentially neglecting the spiritual and philosophical dimensions of Sanskrit literature.

The Battleground: Traditional vs. Modern Interpretations:

·??????? Two Schools of Thought: The book identifies two main schools of thought regarding Sanskrit. The first is the traditional Indian approach, which views Sanskrit with reverence and focuses on its spiritual and literary significance. The second is the "American school" of Indology, which employs critical analysis to examine social and political structures reflected in Sanskrit texts.

·??????? The "American School" Under Scrutiny: Malhotra ji scrutinizes the "American school," particularly some scholars who advocate for reinterpreting Sanskrit texts to highlight alleged social injustices. He argues that such interpretations can be biased and potentially distort the original intent of the texts.

·??????? The Importance of Context: The book emphasizes the importance of understanding Sanskrit texts within their historical and cultural context. It argues that applying modern frameworks without considering the context of their creation can lead to misinterpretations.

Defending Sanskrit: Beyond the Stereotypes:

·??????? Beyond "Dead Language": Malhotra ji challenges the notion of Sanskrit as a "dead language." He argues that Sanskrit continues to be a living language, albeit with a smaller user base, and is actively studied and used in various contexts. The book highlights efforts to revitalize Sanskrit and promote its continued use in modern India.

·??????? More Than Oppression: The book counters the view of Sanskrit as solely reflecting a hierarchical and oppressive social order. It argues that Sanskrit literature encompasses a vast range of themes, including philosophy, ethics, aesthetics, and spiritual exploration.

·??????? Sanskrit and Liberation: Malhotra ji emphasizes the role of Sanskrit in facilitating spiritual liberation (moksha) in Dharmic traditions. He argues that by studying Sanskrit texts, individuals can gain insights into self-realization and spiritual truths.

The Future of Sanskrit: Finding Common Ground:

·??????? Collaboration and Mutual Respect: The book doesn't advocate for complete rejection of Western scholarship on Sanskrit. Instead, it calls for collaboration and mutual respect between traditional Indian scholars and Western researchers.

·??????? Focus on Shared Values: Malhotra ji suggests that both traditional and modern approaches to Sanskrit can find common ground by focusing on shared human values like truth, compassion, and self-knowledge embedded within Sanskrit literature.

·??????? Sanskrit for a Globalized World: The book argues that Sanskrit, with its rich vocabulary and philosophical insights, can offer valuable contributions to a globalized world seeking solutions to contemporary challenges.

Criticisms and Considerations:

·??????? Oversimplification of "Schools of Thought": Critics argue that the book oversimplifies the debate by presenting two distinct camps with no room for nuance. They point out that diverse methodologies exist within both Indian and Western scholarship on Sanskrit.

·??????? Neglecting Internal Debates: Some critics suggest that the book downplays the existence of internal debates within India regarding the interpretation of Sanskrit texts and the role of caste in Indian history.

·??????? Focus on "Western Threat": The book's emphasis on a "Western threat" to Sanskrit might be seen as neglecting the ongoing efforts of Indian scholars to critically engage with Sanskrit and its legacy.

4. Rajiv Malhotra ji's "AI & The Future of Power" delves into the potential impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the balance of power and the very fabric of human civilization. The book argues that AI represents not just a technological advancement but a fundamental shift with far-reaching consequences.

The Iceberg Analogy: Understanding AI's Depth:

·??????? Beyond Efficiency and Convenience: Malhotra ji argues that focusing solely on AI's ability to automate tasks or provide convenience misses the bigger picture. He compares AI to an iceberg, with its readily visible applications forming just the tip. The deeper, submerged aspects represent the potential for AI to fundamentally alter power dynamics and reshape social structures.

·??????? Cognitive and Psychological Dependence: The book warns of a growing dependence on AI for cognitive tasks like decision-making and information processing. This dependence, Malhotra ji argues, could lead to a decline in critical thinking and independent thought processes in humans.

·??????? The Algorithmic Gaze: Malhotra ji raises concerns about the potential for AI algorithms to become the dominant form of "seeing" and interpreting the world. He argues that these algorithms can be biased and reflect the values of their creators, potentially leading to discriminatory or manipulative outcomes.

The Battlegrounds: Where AI Reshapes Power:

·??????? Shifting Power Balances: The book identifies five key "battlegrounds" where AI will significantly impact the distribution of power:

·??????? The Power of Framing: The book emphasizes the importance of how AI is framed and implemented. Who controls AI development and for what purposes will determine its impact on power dynamics.

Beyond Dystopia: Harnessing AI for Good:

·??????? Human-Centered Development: "AI & The Future of Power" doesn't advocate for abandoning AI development. Instead, it calls for a human-centered approach to AI development, ensuring it serves humanity's best interests.

·??????? Ethical Considerations: The book emphasizes the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide AI development and deployment. Consideration for fairness, transparency, and accountability in AI systems is crucial.

·??????? Augmenting, Not Replacing: Malhotra ji argues that AI should be viewed as a tool to augment human capabilities, not replace them. AI can be used to enhance creativity, problem-solving, and decision-making when combined with human judgment.

The Depopulation Question: A Controversial Aspect:

·??????? A Call for Action: The book raises the controversial question of whether widespread AI adoption could lead to depopulation, as machines become more efficient and potentially replace human labor across various sectors. Malhotra ji argues that this is a potential risk that needs to be addressed, although the book doesn't delve deeply into solutions.

·??????? A Call for Public Engagement: "AI & The Future of Power" emphasizes the importance of public engagement in discussions around AI development and policy. The book calls for open dialogue and democratic participation in shaping the future of AI.

?