My friend who works at Linkedin explained to me what Linkedin does.
I feel obliged to say something about subscribing to Linkedin here. I'm trying, but it's getting more and more confusing. At least I did not understand why it was so poorly made, until my friend who works at Linkedin explained to me what Linkedin does during the day.
After his explanation, it became clear that there was no point in using a Linkedin subscription. You can post to the feed, keep a blog, but this, of course, is not a full-fledged subscription, at least not what it should be if we want to make a quality product.
I also made a few posts to see how linked algorithms work, and at least they are more generous in sharing traffic than Facebook.
The problem is that I still do not understand - is there any fundamental difference if you write a post, a separate article or an article in the mailing list. Obviously, the products had some idea in their heads - why all this is necessary, but they could not convey it.
The best way to understand how things work is to watch how content creators with large audiences post content. I will watch and share.
Also, I still don't quite understand the audience here and what seems relevant to them. Audience analysis is also in progress.
AI-Driven Instructional Designer | Learning Automation | Scalable Training Solutions for Startups & Growing Teams
1 年I absolutely agree, but there is a significant nuance - the lifetime of a post in all social networks is negligible. The exception is YouTube, as there is a built-in search engine, and with SEO it gradually gives an increasing result.
Product Manager @ Hearst Magazines
1 年There are certain triggers for an algorithm to boost a post, one of them (there are more triggers) is to get comments asap. If a post is commented during couple of hours - up, if no engagement - graveyard. So I'd recommend to pay attention to the speed when creators get first comments and correlation between engagement and impressions