My 25 Years in Learning & Development

My 25 Years in Learning & Development

This week is the 25th anniversary of me leaving corporate land, starting my little company and setting out on my own in the world of L&D.

Like many in L&D, I didn't start out with L&D as a choice. Like many, it just kind of happened through a series of 'happy' accidents.

From customer to practitioner

I was a customer of L&D long before I became a practitioner. I attended training courses, and I sent people in my team off on training courses. Back then, there was little else besides a training course, and I didn’t give much thought to whether the course was 'good'. It was logistically convenient and at the right price, so I bought it. I cringe in hindsight.

One day I was asked to deliver some training on a subject someone figured I knew a bit about, and with much trepidation, I did it. I survived and didn't 'fail' because the happy sheet said people liked the course, or maybe they liked my jokes and felt sorry for me and my fumbling delivery skills. I started working part-time for a training company and rather enjoyed it, being the sage on the stage deftly switching from one OHP acetate to the next.

Despite being told I was good at training because the happy sheets said so, my engineering mind was uncomfortable. What was I really doing? Why was it being done? Did it make a difference? It felt a bit like cranking a handle on a wall where I couldn't see the other side. But I was paid to crank, so that's what I did.

The shift to Learning Transfer

Fast-forward many years, and it did take that long, the questions remained, and I started thinking about learning transfer, training course impact, and ongoing performance support, although I wouldn't have used those words back then.

It bothered me that training courses 'failed' in the sense that they didn't make much difference. Not just the courses I delivered, but most courses. As an engineer, if I designed machinery with that level of failure, I would be out of a job, and maybe even injuring the people who used my designs. Something was wrong in the world of organisational L&D.

The Learning at Work trilogy

I can't say I set out to fix the world, but I did start thinking about how things could change for the better and how I could make a difference. That led me to the topics for my books. The first, "Informal Learning at Work", was inspired by the work of Jay Cross and others. Too often, we ignore what is right in front of us in terms of how people learn what they need to know to do their jobs.

Then I turned my attention to the reason so many people appeared on training courses that were unsuitable for solving the stated performance issue. "Capability at Work" was my attempt to pull together the kind of diagnostics process that should be done before any learning initiative is considered. It is a process to help the person requesting training to see what they actually need rather than just what they want.

The third book in the trilogy tackled the biggest elephant in the room. "Learning Transfer at Work" looks at how to ensure that, following a training course, people start doing things differently. I sincerely hope the books have helped people shift their thinking and change their mindset about three of the elephants in the L&D room.

The Concept of Learning Workflows and the Learning Workflow Platform

At heart, I am still an engineer, and engineers like building things. So, I built a software platform to fill what I see as a gap in the range of L&D tools. If you want people to change their behaviour as a result of an L&D programme, it has to include a lot more than just attending a training course or doing some elearning. People need to experiment, practice, reflect, discuss and much more.

I coined the term 'learning workflow' to describe the concept of a workflow of activities spread over time that would lead to a new behaviour or set of behaviours. I first proposed the concept in my book on learning transfer. In my opinion, you will get little or no learning transfer without a 'learning workflow'. And if you want to do that at scale, you need a Learning Workflow Platform or LWP.

Looking to the future

This platform is now the focus of my company, People Alchemy Ltd , which is 25 years old this week, and the company birthday is the reason I am reflecting here on some of the things that have happened over that time. L&D has been an amazing sector to work in, and I am grateful for the wonderful people I have met and the experiences I have had along the way.

I am looking forward to more :-)

Speaking of wonderful people, maybe you and I should have a chat about what challenges you have in your L&D practice. Do get in touch.

My best wishes, Paul


Originally published on my blog https://peoplealchemy.com/blog/my-25-years-in-learning-development/

Olabimpe Alale

learning and Development * Ecosystems Management * Food Business owner

8 个月

Congratulations!

回复
Marian Stirbescu

CEO and Senior Trainer at Axioma Solutions UK | Romania | Bulgaria at Axioma Solutions, Founder at Colltrain

9 个月

Dear Paul, Your Monday tip from Paul has been a source of inspiration for me for the past ten years. Congrats!

回复
Ger Driesen

Learning Innovation Leader

9 个月

Congrats Paul!

Congratulations Paul - a focus on Learning Transfer is always a good (and often ignored) thing to have in any L&D project! As a fellow engineer I am also biased to that approach ??

Dr. Nigel Paine

Co-Presenter @ Learning Now TV | Dprof. in Learning And Development

9 个月

Well done, Paul Matthews. Another 25 years to go, and you will move from novice to practitioner!!! You have made a significant contribution and sustained a company. Excellent work

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Paul Matthews的更多文章

  • Design learning to fit into peoples' working lives

    Design learning to fit into peoples' working lives

    So much of the success of learning transfer is based on what people do after the formal training, when they return to…

  • The doctor analogy – can it help you in L&D?

    The doctor analogy – can it help you in L&D?

    If you are a trainer and feel that you have limited influence as to what goes on after the training event, think about…

    9 条评论
  • Time is of the essence when you design learning programmes

    Time is of the essence when you design learning programmes

    Time is of the essence – design your learning programmes so people are required to put into practice as quickly as…

    6 条评论
  • The road not taken – and L&D sentiment

    The road not taken – and L&D sentiment

    Donald H Taylor has released his latest L&D Global Sentiment survey. If you are in L&D, it is well worth a read.

    5 条评论
  • Today, think about what tomorrow brings for your trainees

    Today, think about what tomorrow brings for your trainees

    Every workplace evolves. If you train for today, what about tomorrow? Each trainee already has differences in the…

  • Performance support: why as well as how

    Performance support: why as well as how

    Have you ever read a software help file that tells you that the button with SAVE written on it does indeed save the…

    3 条评论
  • It's crystal ball time again! Can we see learning transfer?

    It's crystal ball time again! Can we see learning transfer?

    It's common at this time of year for people to gaze into their crystal ball or look thoughtfully at the bottom of their…

    9 条评论
  • AI in Learning & Development

    AI in Learning & Development

    In this last L&D Monday newsletter of the year, instead of offering my opinion and tips, I would like to invite you to…

    11 条评论
  • A pyramid for modern performance

    A pyramid for modern performance

    Consider what support resources need to be available to trainees as they progress through their learning transfer…

    6 条评论
  • Who are you when you are not there?

    Who are you when you are not there?

    The other day I overheard some people speaking about me. I was both surprised and grateful for what they had to say.

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了