The MVP Dilemma in ERP and SAP Development: Cleaning Up Before Redrawing
Laeeq Siddique
SAP Technical Consultant | Solution Architect | A Philomath | Driving Enterprise Success through Expert Solution Design & Development | Passionate about Consulting and Empowering People in SAP & Consulting Careers.
In today’s fast-paced world of software development, the concept of the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) has become a cornerstone. Whether you’ve seen the popular diagram where a skateboard evolves into a car or heard the mantra of “release early, release often,” the MVP strategy focuses on getting the most essential features into users' hands quickly. This approach has revolutionized how we think about product development, including in the complex world of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.
For companies running large-scale ERP systems, including those powered by SAP, delivering solutions that meet core business needs as efficiently as possible is critical. The MVP approach can help by focusing on delivering a minimum but functional version of a product or feature, enabling faster rollouts. However, while the MVP method offers undeniable benefits in terms of speed and risk management, it is not without its challenges.
Too often, MVPs are delivered but remain stuck in their initial form—a "kick scooter" that never evolves into the "car" the business envisioned. In enterprise environments, where integrations, scalability, and user experience are paramount, this can create friction and inefficiencies that grow over time.
The Advantages of the MVP Approach
Before diving into the potential pitfalls, it’s important to recognize why the MVP strategy is so widely adopted, especially for organizations running complex systems like ERP:
These advantages make the MVP strategy a go-to method for many teams, particularly in environments where agility and speed are essential. However, there are hidden challenges that arise when MVPs aren’t given the attention they need post-launch.
The Hidden Problems with MVPs
The true challenge with MVPs isn't in delivering the initial version, it’s in what happens next. Too often, teams focus on the next big project without fully refining or completing the initial MVP, which leads to several problems, especially in ERP environments:
领英推荐
So, how do you avoid these pitfalls while still leveraging the power of the MVP approach?
How to Maximize the Impact of Your MVP: Clean Up Before Redrawing
One key principle for getting the most out of your MVP is the concept of "cleaning up before redrawing." In other words, take time to refine and improve the initial MVP before rushing off to build new features. This approach emphasizes the importance of polishing what’s been built and ensuring the product’s foundations are strong before moving forward. Here’s how companies, especially those running ERP systems, can implement this principle:
Conclusion: The Key to MVP Success in ERP-Driven Companies
In today’s dynamic development environments, the MVP approach is an essential tool for getting products to market quickly and efficiently. For businesses running large ERP systems, where adaptability and scalability are key, the MVP can help address immediate needs while laying the groundwork for future growth. However, speed should not come at the cost of long-term sustainability.
By embracing the principle of "cleaning up before redrawing," development teams can avoid the common pitfalls of incomplete MVPs and build solutions that are not only functional but refined, cohesive, and scalable. The true power of the MVP lies not just in its ability to deliver quickly, but in the commitment to improving it once it’s in users' hands.
Taking the time to clean up before moving on can transform a good MVP into a great one, ensuring long-term success and better user experiences across the enterprise.
Great insights, Laeeq Siddique! Your approach of "cleaning up before redrawing" is truly intriguing. Refining the MVP strategy can undoubtedly lead to long-term success for ERP-driven companies. Keep up the great work!
C Level Executive with a Proven Track Record in Growing and Scaling SAP Services and Solutions Practices
1 个月Great narrative Laeeq!
SAP S/4 HANA | ERP Transformation | SAP COE
1 个月Very useful insights.. Sometimes we need MVP because a user is not sure of the requirement or may not have the full knowledge of system limitations and strengths.. I agree with the point that MVP needs a revision