MVP

MVP, or Model-View-Presenter, is a software architectural pattern commonly used in Android development. It is a variation of the traditional MVC pattern and focuses on separating the presentation logic from the view and the data manipulation from the model. Here's a detailed explanation of MVP in the context of Android:

• Overview: MVP builds upon the MVC pattern and aims to improve testability and separation of concerns.
• Key Concepts: Model represents data and business logic, View displays the UI, and Presenter acts as a mediator between the View and Model.
• Benefits: Improved testability, decoupling of components, easier maintenance.
• Use Cases:?Large-scale applications, projects with complex UI logic.

? ? +-------------------+
? ? |? ?View/Activity? ?|
? ? +---------+---------+
? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?Creates
? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
? ? +---------v---------+
? ? |? ? ? Presenter? ? |
? ? +---------+---------+
? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?Updates
? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
? ? +---------v---------+
? ? |? ? ? ?Model? ? ? ?|
? ? +-------------------+        

In the MVP architecture:

• Model: The model represents the data and business logic of the application. It encapsulates the data and provides methods for accessing and manipulating it. In Android, the model typically consists of data sources such as databases, network APIs, or local storage.
• View: The view is responsible for rendering the user interface and displaying data to the user. It should be passive and devoid of any business logic. In Android, the view is implemented using activities, fragments, or custom UI components. The view should only communicate with the presenter and not directly access the model.
• Presenter: The presenter acts as an intermediary between the view and the model. It handles the presentation logic, processes user input, and updates the view based on changes in the model. The presenter also interacts with the model to fetch data and perform operations. It should not have any references to the Android framework classes to ensure testability.

The main goal of MVP is to decouple the view and the model by introducing a separate presenter layer. This separation allows for better testability, as the presenter can be easily unit tested without requiring an Android device or emulator. It also promotes modularity and reusability, as the view and the model can be modified or replaced independently without affecting other components.

In Android, MVP is commonly used to build complex user interfaces, especially when dealing with activities and fragments. The view interfaces define the contract between the view and the presenter, ensuring loose coupling. The presenter holds a reference to the view interface and manages its lifecycle callbacks, user interactions, and data updates. The model is responsible for providing the necessary data to the presenter, which then updates the view accordingly.

MVP in Android has some advantages, including better separation of concerns, improved testability, and easier maintenance. However, it also introduces additional complexity compared to simpler patterns like MVC. The presence of the presenter layer can make the codebase larger and more complex, requiring careful design and management.

Communication flow:

1. The Activity (View) creates an instance of the Presenter.
2. The Presenter communicates with the Model to fetch or manipulate data as required.
3. The Presenter updates the View by calling methods or setting properties on the View.
4. The View reflects the changes made by the Presenter to the UI.

Limitations :

1. Increased Complexity: MVP introduces additional components such as the presenter and interfaces, which can increase the complexity of the codebase. Developers need to manage the communication between the view, presenter, and model, leading to more code and potential maintenance challenges.
2. Tighter Coupling: MVP can result in tighter coupling between the view and presenter, as they need to interact closely to handle user actions and update the UI. This tight coupling can make it more difficult to modify or replace individual components without affecting others.
3. View-Related Logic: In MVP, the view is responsible for handling UI-related tasks, such as displaying data, handling user input, and updating the UI. This can lead to situations where view-related logic becomes more complex and difficult to test, as it is tightly coupled with the Android framework.
4. Lack of Standardization: Unlike some other architectural patterns, MVP does not have a standardized implementation or guidelines. This can result in variations in how MVP is implemented, making it harder for developers to collaborate on projects or understand codebases from different teams.
5. Learning Curve: MVP introduces new concepts and responsibilities, such as the separation of concerns and the role of the presenter. Developers who are new to MVP may require additional time and effort to understand and adopt the pattern effectively.
6. View-State Management: In MVP, managing the state of the view can be a challenge, especially when dealing with complex UI interactions or handling configuration changes. Ensuring proper synchronization between the view and presenter to preserve the view state can require careful implementation.

Example :

Let's assume we're building a simple login screen. Here's how the different components of MVP would be implemented:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Model: The model represents the data and business logic. In this case, it would include classes for user authentication, such as a UserRepository or a UserDataSource.

IUserRepository Interface:

interface IUserRepository {
? ? fun authenticate(username: String, password: String): Boolean
}        

UserRepository Implementation:

class UserRepository : IUserRepository {
? ? override fun authenticate(username: String, password: String): Boolean {
? ? ? ? // Perform authentication logic here
? ? ? ? // Return true if authentication is successful, false otherwise
? ? ? ? return (username == "admin" && password == "password")
? ? }
}        

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

View:The view is responsible for displaying the user interface and capturing user input. It should have minimal logic and delegate most actions to the presenter. In this example, we'll use an Activity as the view.

The view interface, ILoginActivityView, defines the contract between the view and the presenter. It includes methods like showLoading(), showSuccess(), showError(), etc., to update the UI based on the authentication result.

interface ILoginActivityView {
? ? fun showLoading()
? ? fun showSuccess()
? ? fun showError(message: String)
}        

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Presenter:The presenter acts as an intermediary between the view and the model. It contains the logic for handling user interactions and business operations.

The presenter interface, ILoginActivityPresenter, defines the contract between the presenter and the view. It includes methods like login(username, password) to initiate the authentication process.

interface ILoginActivityPresenter {
? ? fun login(username: String, password: String)
}        

The presenter implementation, LoginActivityPresenterImpl, implements the ILoginActivityPresenter interface. It interacts with the model (UserRepository) to perform authentication and updates the view based on the result.

class LoginActivityPresenterImpl(
? ? private val view: ILoginActivityView,
? ? private val userRepository: IUserRepository
) : ILoginActivityPresenter {


? ? override fun login(username: String, password: String) {
? ? ? ? // Show loading state on the view
? ? ? ? view.showLoading()

? ? ? ? // Perform authentication using the IUserRepository
? ? ? ? val result = userRepository.authenticate(username, password)

? ? ? ? // Update the view based on the authentication result
? ? ? ? if (result) {
? ? ? ? ? ? view.showSuccess()
? ? ? ? } else {
? ? ? ? ? ? view.showError("Invalid credentials")
? ? ? ? }
? ? }
}        

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Putting it all together:In the Activity class, we instantiate the presenter and handle user interactions.

class LoginActivity : AppCompatActivity(), ILoginActivityView {
? ? private lateinit var presenter: ILoginActivityPresenter

? ? override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
? ? ? ? super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
? ? ? ? setContentView(R.layout.activity_login)

? ? ? ? // Create the presenter with dependencies (view and model)
? ? ? ? presenter = LoginActivityPresenterImpl(this, UserRepository())


? ? ? ? // Handle login button click
? ? ? ? loginButton.setOnClickListener {
? ? ? ? ? ? val username = usernameEditText.text.toString()
? ? ? ? ? ? val password = passwordEditText.text.toString()


? ? ? ? ? ? // Delegate login action to the presenter
? ? ? ? ? ? presenter.login(username, password)
? ? ? ? }
? ? }

? ? override fun showLoading() {
? ? ? ? // Show loading state on the UI (e.g., display a progress bar)
? ? ? ? progressBar.visibility = View.VISIBLE
? ? }

? ? override fun showSuccess() {
? ? ? ? // Show success message on the UI (e.g., navigate to the home screen)
? ? ? ? Toast.makeText(this, "Login successful", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show()
? ? }

? ? override fun showError(message: String) {
? ? ? ? // Show error message on the UI (e.g., display an error message)
? ? ? ? Toast.makeText(this, message, Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show()
? ? }
}        

In this updated example, the UserRepository class represents the model. It handles the authentication logic and returns a Boolean result. The LoginActivityView interface and LoginActivityPresenter interface define the contract between the view and the presenter, and the LoginActivityPresenterImpl implements the presenter interface, interacting.

The above code is still not perfect , since dependencies are tightly coupled .

We need to inject or provide the dependency from outside .

It looks MVP and MVC are similar( Looks like C in MC is replaced by P in MVP), however there is difference between them:

Both patterns have their advantages and are suitable for different scenarios. MVC is more traditional and widely used, while MVP provides better separation of concerns and testability. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project.

While they have similarities, there are some key differences between them:

1. IN MVC , user inputs are forwarded to controller as it is like onButtonClick() i.e controller expose the API such as onButtonClick() and then controller takes the action based UI event . But where as in MVL , Presenter dont handle the UI events , but instead expose the high level API such Login(usename,paswd). So presenter is not handling the view/UI events. This point is same as send point i.e separation of concerns.

1. Separation of Concerns:

• MVC: In MVC, the Controller is responsible for handling user input, updating the model, and updating the view. The Model represents the data and business logic, while the View is responsible for rendering the user interface.
• MVP: In MVP, the Presenter acts as a middleman between the View and the Model. The View is responsible for rendering the UI and handling user input, while the Presenter handles the logic, interacts with the Model, and updates the View.

3. Dependency Direction:

• MVC: In MVC, the Controller has a strong dependency on both the Model and the View. It receives input from the user and updates the Model and View accordingly.
• MVP: In MVP, the Presenter has a strong dependency on the View, but the View has a weak reference to the Presenter. The Presenter updates the View and handles user input, but the View is not aware of the concrete implementation of the Presenter.

4. Testability:

• MVC: MVC can be more challenging to test due to the tight coupling between the Controller, Model, and View. Mocking dependencies and isolating components for unit testing can be more complex.
• MVP: MVP promotes better testability as the Presenter can be easily mocked or stubbed for unit testing. The View interface allows for easy separation of concerns and mocking the View for testing purposes.

5. Code Organization:

• MVC: MVC typically results in a structure where the Controller handles user input and delegates tasks to the Model and View. This can sometimes lead to a bloated Controller with multiple responsibilities.
• MVP: MVP promotes a clear separation of concerns, where the View handles UI-related tasks, the Presenter handles the logic and interaction with the Model, and the Model represents the data and business logic.

Thanks for reading , please comment if you have any.