Mr Hunt’s Triple Lock Dilemma
For the duration of the current Parliament, the United Kingdom (UK) Government has pledged to up-rate the basic State Pension (bSP) and new State Pension (nSP) in line with the ‘Triple Lock’, something that has never been put into legislation.? This was in the 2019 Conservative Party Manifesto as, simply:
The Triple Lock means that the bSP and nSP will increase by the higher of:?
When you look at the published figures, you will see various CPI values quoted:?
All have a meaning and all are important for analysts who can use these figures to convey trends.? But as professionals, we are only interested in the CPI value.?
The question, though, is ‘what is earnings inflation’?? This must be defined in legislation.
It’s not there!?
The Social Security Administration Act 1992 (section 150A) in Great Britain requires The Secretary of State to increase pensions in line with a review of the general level of earnings over a review period.? The Social Security Administration Act (Northern Ireland) Act 1992 (section 132A) says that Northern Ireland may make an Order corresponding with that made in Great Britain.?
Yet, there is no statutory definition of earnings inflation, just that the Secretary of State ‘shall estimate the general level of earnings in such manner as he sees fit’.??
By convention, the Government has compared the Nominal Average Weekly Earnings (AWE) from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for the three months to July in one year and compared it to the following year (i.e. looking at May to July 2022 compared to May to July 2023).?
We need three values, and now we have them all:?
?So, convention has it that the bSP and nSP will increase by 8.5% in April 2024.
As above, there is no legislative commitment.? However, there is a Manifesto commitment (‘we will keep the triple lock’).? This is, perhaps, more important.??
领英推荐
Legislation is easy to change.? A political commitment is not, especially as April 2024 is the last time that the State Pension values will change before a General Election.? So, as I see it, there are two options:?
Remember that the only legislative commitment is for the UK Government (the Secretary of State for the DWP) to ‘estimate the general level of earnings in such manner as he sees fit’).? What this means is that despite any convention, if the 8.5% level is not deemed fit, another measure can be used.?
The Social Security Administration Act 1992 requires the UK Government to increase pensions in line with a review of the general level of earnings over a review period (the May to July comparison above published on 12 September 2023 as 8.5%).? However, this ONS value reflects annual earnings growth including bonuses.??
The ONS said themselves the rate was ‘affected’ by one-off payments and bonuses paid to employees in the NHS and civil service.? Annual earnings growth excluding bonuses was 7.8%.
Here is Mr Hunt’s dilemma, to be figured out before the rate is announced at the Autumn Statement in November.? Regardless of 8.5% or the lower 7.8%, there are two constants:?
?PLUS, there are two other factors:?
This dilemma has been faced before and one that I’m glad that I don’t have to muddle my way through.
It’s always interesting to look at the operation of the Triple Lock over the last few years showing the increases that have applied, highlighting the factor that was used (i.e. earnings, CPI, the 2.5% Lock or something else):
For the sake of completeness, note that the ‘additional’ State Pension (the State Earnings-Related Pension Scheme (SERPS)) rises in line with CPI inflation (the 6.7% announced 18 October 2023).
Chartered Payroll Professional
1 年Interesting analysis, Ian. I suspect he'll stick with the usual definition of earnings growth. The difference between now and 2021 is the election that's on the horizon. Pensioners are a large group and traditionally have been more likely to vote Conservative than younger people so it's not a group the party will want to alienate just now.