The Moronization of Leadership Education

The Moronization of Leadership Education

Years ago, Carl Icahn stated that many of the companies he took over were being run by morons. He maintained that top leaders liked to surround themselves with people less talented to minimize threats of a coup. They were often replaced by one of their less talented direct reports as they retired or moved on, who in turn surrounded themselves with people even less capable. After four or five iterations of successively less capable people moving into top spots, Icahn observed that many senior leaders could say all the right things but did not have a clue on how to make any of it happen.

?

Several things have happened over the past year which causes me to believe that something along the same lines is happening with leadership education in academia. Although there has been an explosion of leadership courses, minors, and majors in higher education over the past 20 years, what is being taught and who is doing the teaching may be missing the mark. This is unfortunate, as college courses are often a person’s first opportunity to systematically learn about leadership. The lessons learned in these courses may stick for life, so it is critically important that academics get it right. But do they? The following examples cause me to worry.

?

Textbook Reviews. I am a co-author of what has been one of the top selling leadership textbooks for the past 30 years, and every three years we ask college professors to provide feedback on the 18 chapters in our book. We ask whether our content is covered in their courses, what they like and don’t like, what is missing, and suggestions for improvement for our chapters. Some of these six professors are teach leadership courses having over 1,000 students each year, and here are some intriguing results:

·?????? About half of the professors covered concepts such as what is leadership, developing as a leader, ethics, power and influence, leader traits, leader behaviors, contingency theories of leadership, and leadership and change. The other professors did not cover these topics in their courses.

·?????? Most of the professors did not cover follower motivation, satisfaction, engagement, performance, potential, groups and teams, situational factors affecting leadership, or the dark side of leadership.

·?????? None of professors’ courses covered critical leadership skills, such as how to manage stress, set goals, provide feedback, diagnose performance problems, or build teams.

Although this a small sample, a fair question to ask is: What exactly are professors teaching in their undergraduate and graduate leadership courses? A lot of relevant content seems missing from their courses, and as a result students may be ill-equipped to deal with the challenges of leadership after graduation.

?

Master’s in Organizational Leadership. A few years back my daughter completed her Master’s degree from a prestigious university. We would talk two to three times a week to review the course content, activities, and assignments while she was completing her degree. I loved these conversations, as it was a great way to connect with my daughter and discuss the relevant research surrounding what she was learning, how concepts were interconnected, how they played out in the real world, and their implications for being an effective leader. Two things that shocked me about these conversations was the shallow understanding of the concepts and the lack of real-life experience of the professors. Her professors did not have a good grasp of the relevant literature and could not think critically about what they were teaching. Likewise, they had no real-world leadership experience and could not explain how the concepts played out in the workplace. My daughter has developed a well-tuned b.s. detector when it comes to leadership, although I am not sure what role her Master’s program played in this regard.

?

Leadership Educators. A few months ago, there was a conference for new educators wanting to learn how to teach undergraduate and graduate leadership programs. It was a great idea and noble cause. I offered to help facilitate the conference, as it was taking place less than 15 miles from my home, and I had written and sold many more college textbooks and trained more real leaders than the rest of the staff combined. But not being part of cool club, my offer was declined. Maybe this was a good call, as I could have made my fellow faculty uncomfortable given my earlier comments. The unfortunate consequence is that by not having an external perspective, the problems with what and who is teaching college students about leadership only gets perpetuated.

?

To be fair, there are outstanding educators teaching courses on leadership. I would go to any leadership course taught by Ron Riggio, Susan Murphy, Bob Hogan, Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Jeffrey Pfeffer, Bob Sutton, Rich Hughes, Robert Ginnett, Andrew Munro, Dan Freschi, Rick Lochner, Rob Kaiser, or any of the United States service academies, which place a premium on the research and application of leadership. But I fear that many of those teaching leadership at the undergraduate and graduate level neither have a good handle on the leadership research nor how to apply what we’ve learned to the real world. Academic freedom allows these same professors the latitude to choose what concepts to cover and how teach leadership. Leadership education is an area where colleges and universities could address some of the challenges facing organizations and avoid getting criticized for failing to prepare graduates for real world positions. This would in entail taking a more disciplined approach to leadership education, which most higher education institutions seem loathe to do.

?

?

?

Gordon Curphy is a former college professor who specializes in C-suite succession planning, executive coaching, top team facilitation, scaling effective teamwork, and leadership development. He has developed several successful commercially published leadership and team assessments; coached 200 C-suite executives; worked with over 600 top teams; trained 20,000 leaders; and sold over 100,000 books, chapters, and articles on leadership and teams. You can find more about Gordon’s leadership books and consulting services at:www.curphyleadershipsolutions.com and

Paul Barrett

Chief Research Scientist at Cognadev UK Ltd

1 年

The article : Raelin, J. (2004). Don't bother putting leadership into people. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 3, 131-135. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.14776184. [Paywall]. Says it all for me. Leadership 'training' is about 'doing it', starting gently in the organization (careful graduated, placements) with mentors, with those displaying 'leadership' moving forward and those not showing the seeds of leadership moved into other roles. "Action-learning" in Raelin's article. "Chalk and Talk stuff" is no substitute for actually displaying aspects of leadership 'for real' in the organization (or outside if showing that you've created and led your own small organization from scratch). And no, I don't think anyone can be a leader given 'training'. Sure, some strategic analytical knowledge and critical study of a host of successful and failed leaders will help - but the bottom line is performance-based evidence. You can either demonstrate leadership, or show the potential for leadership and good judgement in the workplace, or you find out you just don't have what it takes, and accept other roles might suit you better. Just my thoughts from observing/working with some stellar leaders (not as a leadership consultant).

Karen Main

Award-winning Author/Speaker/Facilitator/Owner at Innovations in Training

1 年

Well said, Gordon (Gordy) Curphy, PhD . One of my struggles with leadership “education” that has proliferated over the past ten to twenty years is that those new to the field seem to presume that leadership is a “thing” that can be easily explained and understood. But in reality, leadership is the art of responding to circumstances and situations which are not easily defined and predicted in a textbook fashion. “Developing” leaders, at least in my experience, is not possible through a checklist - it’s a set of skills and abilities and perspectives that are cultivated over time. A good textbook to introduce basic principles and philosophies is a good starting point, but it’s not the singular formula.

Kim Baker, Architect of happy, trusting, get-it-done teams

Human performance catalyst, trainer, coach, facilitator, conflict mediator

1 年

Gordon (Gordy) Curphy, PhD You had me at the headline!

Dan Freschi

Leadership & Team Development Executive - SPHR, SHRM-SCP - Author - Combat Veteran

1 年

Gordon (Gordy) Curphy, PhD, I feel quite humbled to be mentioned alongside such revered professionals and luminaries. As an instructor, I strive to ensure that the coursework I teach is practical and research-based. My teachings are mostly derived from my own leadership experiences and supplemented with insights from leaders in our community to demonstrate how research findings can be applied in real-life scenarios. From my decade-long experience in academia, I've observed that most professors teaching leadership have little to no real-world leadership experience. Their focus is solely on theoretical concepts, which creates a significant gap between what students learn in textbooks and how it plays out in the real world. This cognitive dissonance can be quite challenging for students when they enter the workforce.

Rob McKay

Enterprise Educator, Developer of Leaders and Cultivator of Managers. SFHEA FCMI

1 年

Great article. I was commenting the other day on the 'Matryoshka Management' problem, where managers, like the eponymous Russian Dolls, surround themselves with people who are just like them, but less so; just as in your opening paragraph. The body of your article really resonated with me - I've taken teams through major crises and disruptions, and now enjoy (really enjoy) talking to practicing managers and business owners about leadership, hopefully with a foot in practice and a foot in solid theory (if there is such a thing for as contested a concept as Leadership). Too much academic work is rooted in ego and the fear felt by the individual 'leader' and too little in the messy trenches of actual leadership.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了