Morality, where does it come from?
Mark Alan Bartholomew
Applied physics.(JOIN ME) the work presented here is entirely new
Morality. Where does it come from?
Morality comes from our most human condition, to violate local time frames, and to literally "see" into the future, or to intuit, our future. Of course, our future must contain something that represents all things good, right and just; else our populations and history of populations, might be even more violent than we have been.
But how did we get here? How can we say that our human condition allows us to see into some future, violating local time frames?
Well, if you asked a physicist today, or a mathematician, to describe nature or our universe, he or she might say that all things collided, was random and chaotic, violent even. AND HE would be wrong.
There is a way, of understanding our physical universe, our most human of conditions, departing from current knowledge and current thinking. One principle defines nature. Love, is the most common form of description for an elastic, communicating universe. When we get fancy, we call it entanglement. Because entanglements may occur over and over again, creating four new species of energy, we call it robust..... entanglement, RE.
Now when we begin to peer into the human condition, we see two cerebrum, breathing back and forth, back and forth, in what we call a quaternary fine structure creation, shifting in nature, or existing in two places, almost at once.
Our two bodied cerebrum, become this Entanglement (E) haven,... or place. HEAVEN.
And because entanglements incorporate the very distance involved in some "found" symmetry, instantly, producing four new species of fine structures, or energy, when our minds do this, we violate local time frames, when we think.... beyond the geometry of our senses.
Prophesy, is a result then, of a few very talented folks, who make it a practice of utilizing the ventricles in their brain, as much as the sensory ganglion. The ventricles make themselves available, to "sense" our environments, without changing anything. This gives us a pure, or untainted image of our universe. And no one told you? Hm....
Well, the ventricles exist in our brains because of the very peculiar nature of a third and second fine structure to entangle themselves, and to produce a fourth or quaternary fine structure that shifts in place,..... existing in two places, you might say, at once. But you would be wrong. This shifting presence of course occurs readily in the human mind, and does not allow for things to exist in the places that our ventricles evolved to inhabit.
When something entangles with this shifting presence, it jettisons off in some unique, unidimensional velocity. One velocity. Discrete motion.
The key to understanding morality, is that .....
I AM,.... connected to YOU, as YOU are,..... to me.
We are all connected. In fact, you would be amazed to find out that what you see and feel, in large part, represents what others are seeing and feeling.... and you are simply thinking it is you...
Morality is defined... derived,... from our ability then, to sense some "good, right and just" future. The physics allows it to be seen,... i.e. the future. And, some very talented folks over the years, ... thousands thereof,... have seen it, have written about it. And together,... as connected as we all are,... we really feel,.... together, this so very, good... future.
BUT WHY IS MORALITY FADING... in our governance,.. in our business practice?
This is a bit more complicated to explain.
Because nothing truly collides in nature, and all things exist to communicate, generating four new forms of energy, or fine structures... temporary fine structures.... atoms become this autonomous dance of two pseudo waves. And as such, they are creating energy after energy, after energy,... or field, after field, after field... over and over and over again. (The very same one's... for its' specific species of atom.). And cells, in our bodies... are comprised of atoms. THEY DO NOT NEED ENERGY. They are creating energy,.... every minute and second of its' existence. More over, they live for some "relative" time frame of "forever." Cells do, that is, live for some forever time frame.
Why don't they?
Why do cells die,..... age?
The answer is something that drove evolution itself. Flora. The fancy term is AUFI. Advanced, undetected floral innervation. It is a third nervous system. It represents a most primitive nervous system. AUFI makes its' way in and around each and every cell and tissue in our bodies, over the lifetime of the individual plant, or animal,... all things living. And living cells, tissues need energy in the form of ATP, only.... only... in the presence of AUFI.
When the cerebrum itself is compromised, probably around the age of thirty-five for most people, at about the time when hypertensions develop, this fungi, even bacteria and virus, have made a presence known, compromising what we call "cerebral breath." You see, the cerebrum breathe,... back and forth. YOUR mother didn't tell you this?
When flora invades the cerebrum, it produces upwards of tens of thousands of metabolites, that bombard our cells, creating ischemias and inflammatory responses. And, it does much more than this, but we'll be brief here.
In addition to this AUFI presenting itself to our tissues within the cerebrum, slowing our cerebral breath, if one were to eat genetically modified foods, then the AUFI, become even more violent in their interaction with our tissues and cells. YOU see, as we develop genetic talents in the lab, and introduce them into our foods, the fungi within our living tissues, digesting us,.... can digest us BETTER. We teach them to,... as they pick up genetic materials in the foods we eat, to use them against us, to digest us better.
So, now that we have opened pandora's box, genetically modifying our foods, teaching them to grow better in droughts,... to grow bigger, faster, stronger, we then teach our symbiotic, and pathogenic AUFI, to digest us quicker, slowing our cerebral breathe, faster, at a younger age, and even slowing the cerebral breath and cognition itself, to a grinding halt; making each of us more cranky, and irritable, and impulsive. We see it on the highways. And we see it in the aggressive nature of our politics and business practices, of great corruption and collusion and eavesdropping or surveillance,... things that violate constitutions.
But walk with me a while. Allow me to introduce the work to describe nature anew.
?
?
I would be most honored for you to visit my work and to join our discussion.?
?
One Principle?defines nature;?Robust Entanglement. ?Most would call this love.
?
Faith, becomes the sophistication of science, replacing scientific observation. ?However, this may be a faith that most do not recognize.? And, this is a most exquisite understanding and interpretation.
?
Understanding nature in this way allows us to realize energy in four new ways; to experience atomic interactions and chemistries in a new way; to educate our children and adults better, as we come to understand the human condition and nature better; and finally, to understand the physical connection of me to you, you to me.?
?
Now would you to please join me and 182 distinguished faculty, academicians and theologians, and industry professionals, some of which are listed below. ?There are five discussions you may join: physics & mathematics; and four discussions "downstream," ?including theology, diet & disease, education and cognition, in light of this one principle.
?
When we describe nature in one principle, it becomes a religious matter. Though as many as five biblical principles violate this one natural principle of love.??Walk with me, as we define a new age of understanding; revealing this one principle in our physics, our mathematics, rewriting them, and applying this new understanding to all disciplines downstream.
?
Describing nature in this way, allows for us to have an abundant future. it allows for us to eradicate disease, overnight. ?My passion is to restore all that is good, right and just.
?
I can be made available to come for a visit.
?
Some of those of faith, in discussion(s).
?
1 -?Jessica Eastwood- Teaching Fellow, ?Durham University, ?Durham England? PhD Philosophical?Theology
2 -Sister Joanna Burley? ?College of ?Saint Benedict, St. John's University,?Graduate Student, School of?Theology-Seminary
3 -?Daniel C Norman -? London School of Theology, Graduate Student, Historical?Theology
5 -?Father Rafael Pascual?? Full professor of the faculty of philosophy,?Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum, Rome, Italy.
6 -?Julianne Burnett -? Asbury University, Faculty Member, Bible,?Theology,?Philosophy
7 -?Felipe Coffman? Lancaster Bible College and Graduate School, Graduate Student, Doctor of Ministry
8 -?Robert Hunt ?Southern Methodist University, Department Member,?Theology
10 -?Raymond J Studzinski - Associate Professor of Spirituality and Catechetics Area Director - Catholic University
11 -Rodolfo Vargas -?Barry University, Alumnus, Department of Theology and Philosophy 12 - D. H. Williams - ?Baylor University, Faculty Member, Religion
13 -?Amos Winarto -? STT Aletheia, Faculty Member, Theology
14 -?Ronald Burris -? American Baptist Seminary of the West, Faculty Member, History Department
15 -?C. Christopher Shivers? London School of Theology, Graduate Student, Theology
16 -?Timothy T N Lim -? London School of Theology, Department Member, Theology
17 -?David McClister? Florida College, Post-Doc, Biblical Studies
18 -?Max Jasny -? Assistant Administrator at Martha's Vineyard?Hebrew?Center;?actively involved in the Hebrew Center for twenty years. ?He has served as Minhag committee chair, board member, and vice president, and has also led lay services and taught in the Religious School.?
19 -?John Ross? Liberty University, Graduate Student, Worship and Music
20 -?Josh Berkenwald -? jewish Theological Seminary of America, - Rabbi, Congregation Sinai, San Jose, California
21 -Paul Heck -? Georgetown University, Faculty Member, Theology and Religious Studies
22 -Fatima Tofighi -? University Of Religions And Denominations, Faculty Member, Religious studies
23 -?Christo Benade -? University of Pretoria, Alumnus, Science of Religion and Missiology
24 -David Mahfood? Southern Methodist University, Graduate Student, Graduate Program in Religious Studies
25 -Tim Suffield ?- Senior Pastor, King's Church, Birmingham, UK.
26 -?Ruben Habito -? Cultural linguistics, Christian Theology/Ethics and Radical Orthodoxy (Theology) - Professor of World Religions and Spirituality - Director of Spiritual Formation - Perkins School of Theology, SMU.? Dr. Habito has not joined any discussion yet, but decided to follow me instead; my research profile.
27 -?Mary McClintock Fulkerson -? Professor Emerita of Theology -?Duke Divinity School
28 -Fokke Pathuis ?-PhD- Researcher at Theologische Universiteit Kampen / Netherlands
29 -Harith Ramli ?-has been Lecturer in Theology and World Religion at the Faculty of Education, Edge Hill University in 2018. He grew up in Malaysia, and is an alumni of the Sultan Alam Shah Islamic College (KISAS), Selangor Darul Ehsan. His primary research is in the study the history of Sufism, but he has also published in the fields of Islamic theology and law. He received his doctorate in 2012 for his dissertation on the formation of Sufi thought in the writings of the fourth/tenth century scholar, Abū ?ālib al-Makkī. Prior to this, he has held teaching posts at the Muslim College (London), SOAS, the University of Nottingham, and the University of Cambridge. He was also a research fellow at the Cambridge Muslim College, where he continues to teach an affiliate teaching fellow.
30 -mustafa monjur -? University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, Faculty Member, Department of Islamic Studies
?
?
?
领英推荐
Most?reverent,?kind regards,
?
?
?
?
Mark Alan Bartholomew?
_________________ my profile:
or you may contact me directly in Texas at
832 596-1029
__________________
Discussion of this new work in the physics.
__________________
link to?discussion & article?on A WHOLE NEW APPROACH TO EDUCATION in light of new?science:?
___________________
For a detailed summary of work, and links to additional discussions, including links to discussion of theology of science in light of this new work, please visit the research website:
?
?
?
?
Discussion members in article on new physics & mathematics above:
A NOTE ABOUT ATTENDEES listed above:
?
A few names listed above have been denied a stay in this discussion due to corporate interests and surveillance technologies, information?technologies, and fields therein.. A hundred names were rejected?entry and do not appear. ?Listed are a few members that?were?allowed to remain for a day or so and to read and download works. ? It is my intention to use this public presence to denounce the?corporate form of conducting business. ?It will be my goal to suggest that we return to the farms, of old. ?Work, being ever so important. ?Sharing interests across borders does not seem good, right or just. ?Providing energy to do unlimited work in this manner will be?possible, presently. ?There is much to say on this matter, and?I will?address this when the time comes. ?
?
SIGNIFICANCE
?
Today, you are among?seven churches to receive this work?..... Jews, Baptists, first and second,?Lutheran, Methodist, Catholics, Presbyterians and Episcopalians.? I know there's a lot to digest here, but there's more. There are no references to previous works. ?There is only Faith. It is important for you to understand what is possible, and how this work was created.?
?
BRIEF HISTORY
?
Over the past?forty years,?this work has been presented to the scientific community.?First,?it was Dr. Nicholas Samios, the former director of the Brookhaven Laboratories for High Energy Spin Physics, in 1984. ?I was a boy, seventeen. ?He contacted me directly, over the phone after sending him this work. He was very animated. ?We spoke for thirty minutes. ?He left me with kind letter. He was, for me, a saint; Saint Nicholas, for he confirmed what I already knew. That my work violated all aspects of our physics, including the standard model, conservation of energy, mass and momentum, and more. ?Then, it was sending eighty pages and paperback books to members of the national Academy of Sciences, over the next thirty-five ?years. ?Finally, over the past three years, it has been in the way of twelve?thousand?emails, inviting researchers to read this work and to join a live discussion with explanation. To date, no one understands this work. ?
?
I have attempted to build a relationship with the president of the National Academy of Sciences over the past four years now. ?After our initial ten emails back and forth, with her vehemently rejecting my work or talks of meeting for lunch or for lecture to her staff, she has had a?change of heart,?and joined this live discussion in the past month. ?I do not know why. ?
?
This work promises energy in four new forms, forming freely, for?some grand, new abundant future.??This work promises clean environments and restoration of climate, as atomic motions are understood and able to be managed and manipulated. ?This work promises to alter the events of our lives in the way of?ridding our bodies of disease and the affects of aging.?But there's more.
?
Should you wish to see this work, it comes in many forms, in live discussion of the physics and mathematics, or in live discussion of a new understanding of diet and disease, or in live discussion of a new understanding of cognition, or even the theology of science. Finally, there's a discussion on educating ourselves, our children, in light of this new work. ?You will merely need to generate an "academia" account, anyone can join, and then you will have complete access. ?Each of the faculty listed above had to generate an account.
?
I hope you will participate in this good news and help to spread the word. ?I know you are terribly busy. ?This is work that may be accessed and viewed in your leisure. ?Although it is a live discussion, it is ongoing, for the next three years and more perhaps, as long as it takes for everyone to hear of God's presence in our lives and environment and science.
?
I know this comes at you from "nowhere." ?There truly is no good way to spring this on someone. ?And, this work will never see the light of day in our news medias for many reasons; it replaces our energy sector, it finds faith to be an intrinsic part of man; and it replaces our scientific method. ?Each of us now will have to walk that walk with God, or deny his or her physical self and be denied by all others. ?Each of us will have to acknowledge our connection to all things, to one another. ?In short, love defines this new understanding, as described in our bible. And, yet there is a physical presence that is associated with this "connection" to all things, to one another; a temporary, real physical presence. ?The fancy term is called?robust entanglement.?Symmetries formed in a quaternary fine structure shift back and forth, back and forth, giving us the notions of life itself; or Holy Spirit, as defined in our bible. Forty years this work has been denied. ?And we hear nothing. ?So, I come to you now, directly, planting seeds. ??
?
Let us discuss a few truths that have been sealed up for a few thousand years. ?Again, this is a bit technical, and it is very intense. And we address many of our scriptural metaphors.
?
Our predecessors told us that things collide. ?They told us that there were a hundred principles to describe nature, including multiple dimensions and more. ?They divided the phenomenon in nature into cute little packets of understanding. ?They told us there were four forces; including gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces; ?they told us about energy and matter and said that neither can be created or destroyed. ?They said energy and matter and momentum were conserved. ?And they were wrong.
I. ONE principle defines nature. ?
?
All things communicate, forming what we have understood in the past, to be some body of Christ, physically describable in both physics and mathematics. (The ten dollar word is "entanglement." ? God tells us to love Him with all our heart, and to love our neighbor as we love ourselves. ?Well, this is what nature does; ?It loves, or "communicates." ?Theoretical physicists call it entanglement. ?YOU, ME, OUR RELIGIONS call it LOVE; a new science calls it robust entanglement.)
?
II. Nothing truly collides.
?
III. Two natural principals exist in nature, in our universe:
? ? ?A. Comparison, eliciting some Distance, for which we then may find and apply,
? ? ?B. Adjudication, or judgement, where we apply over some distance, texture and size, found in some symmetry in space
IV. Here do we find the Christian Cross, as comparison and Adjudication, when we mathematize these concepts, become two planks of unique length, in directions not to contribute to the direction of the other, are then separated by some translation, or circle that does not meet back on itself, giving life to ?plank's constant, in some robust plank's constant, making all these, describing each thing, to be some unique presence in nature, in our universe.
?
V. Faith, becomes the sophistication of science, replacing scientific observation (as we understand the cerebrum to breathe back and forth, back and forth, a systems wide manifestation of single quaternary fine structure creations, formed out of atomic interactions in robust entanglement, forming energy from nothing, in four new forms, giving us the notion of life itself; ?defining life, itself.
?
VI. Here in some quaternary fine structure creation, we find a shifting presence, giving us the notion of life itself, and in this formation of living things, or living systems, a bicameral presence develops, giving us the notions of entanglement havens, or heaven.
?
VII. And, in this elastic universe, where all things communicate, finding symmetries, forming four new forms of energy, from nothing, for some grand new abundant future, we find that these things occur instantly, across any distance great or small.
?
SIN, becomes this physical presence within living systems; ?called AUFI, for advanced undetected floral innervation.
?
The human cell lives for some "relative" time frame of "forever." It is only in the presence of SIN, or AUFI that life needs nourishment, or energy in the way of ATP, as energy forms freely within each cell. ?And, as we come now to understand this human cellular condition, in the presence of SIN, we may now extend life for some relative time frame of forever, beyond imagination; ridding ourselves of disease, aging and death for any foreseeable future.
?
Disease, aging, death, are all a product of SIN, or AUFI.
?
Evil, becomes this phonetically evolved understanding of Evolution, or SIN's influence on life forms, and systems evolution, describable in a mathematics and physics; bringing to life what we have understood in our bibles as 666; ?whereby four groups of six arrangements or permutations of special natural variables, form three groups of unnatural events, and one group of six describing an actual natural event.
?
I know this is overwhelming. ?And yet we have misunderstood nature for so long. ?It is so very frustrating that we never quite had answers for anything it seems. ?Especially when we, ourselves ?were/are sick, and we sought/seek the advice from our doctors. ?We were and are at the mercy of science and technology companies and hence corporations for so long now. ?And we have come to this place of complete tyranny, with displays of tyrannical behaviors not seen since the time of the Romans.
Capitalism has now turned on its' people. ?
?
If this work does nothing else, it will relate to you the true nature of prayer, and the ?true nature of a body of Christ, real physical entities. When we pray, we create a fine structure, temporary fine structures, what we understand to be energy, in four new forms. Those of you that pray have felt "a movement," have seen a movement. ?In these fields, do we then entangle, and move. There's so much more to reveal. ?Please join me. May God bless you.