Monolithic vs. Microservices: Solution Architecture Decision-Making

As a Solution Architect, one of the most fundamental architectural decisions you’ll make is choosing between a Monolithic or Microservices approach. This decision isn’t just about technology—it’s about aligning business goals, team structure, scalability needs, and operational complexity.

Understanding Monolithic Architecture in Solution Architecture

A Monolithic Architecture means the entire application is built as a single unit, more often than not with:

• A single codebase for the backend, frontend, and database.
• A single deployment for the entire system.
• Tightly coupled components, meaning changes in one part of the app can affect the whole system.

When should you choose Monolithic?

You should choose a monolithic approach:

If you’re launching a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), monoliths allow for faster iteration and simpler deployments.

If the product doesn't require independent scalability for different modules, a monolithic approach reduces overhead.

If your team doesn’t have experience managing distributed systems, a monolith simplifies maintenance.

3 of the most common challenges with Monoliths

The entire application must scale together, even if only one module experiences high traffic.

As teams grow, coordinating development in a large codebase becomes difficult.

A bug in one part of the application can block the release of unrelated features.

Understanding Microservices in Solution Architecture

A Microservices Architecture consists of multiple independently deployable services, each responsible for a specific function of the application. These services communicate via APIs, event-driven messaging, or service buses.

When should you choose Microservices?

You should choose a microservice approach:

If different parts of the system experience different loads (e.g., payment processing vs. user authentication), microservices allow independent scaling.

If multiple teams are working on the same product, microservices enable them to work independently without interfering with each other’s code.

If different parts of the business have separate concerns (e.g., logistics vs. customer service), microservices help encapsulate those responsibilities.

Different microservices can be built using different tech stacks based on their requirements (e.g., Python for AI services, Node.js for web APIs).

3 of the most common challenges with Microservices

Managing multiple services requires orchestration tools like Kubernetes, Istio, or service meshes.

Debugging is harder because failures can be network-related rather than just code-related.

Each microservice may need its own database, introducing eventual consistency challenges.

How to decide: Monolithic vs. Microservices

You must evaluate trade-offs based on the business and technical landscape. Here’s a decision framework I use:

Team Size

• Monolithic: Best suited for small teams.
• Microservices: Works well for large teams with independent ownership of services.

Scalability

• Monolithic: The entire application scales together, even if only one part needs more resources.
• Microservices: Each service scales independently, optimizing resource usage.

Complexity

• Monolithic: Simpler systems with fewer moving parts, making it easier to manage initially.
• Microservices: More complex, especially with multiple domains and inter-service communication.

Deployment Frequency

• Monolithic: Deployments are less frequent, often requiring the entire application to be redeployed.
• Microservices: Frequent, independent deployments for each service allow faster iterations.

Technology Flexibility

• Monolithic: Uses a single tech stack for all components.
• Microservices: Different services can use different tech stacks, enabling more flexibility.

Operational Maturity

• Monolithic: Easier to maintain with fewer dependencies, requiring less DevOps expertise.
• Microservices: Requires strong DevOps skills to manage orchestration, monitoring, and deployments.

So, how do you choose? It's not always either or.

Start with a monolith when speed and simplicity matter.

Extract microservices from the monolith as the business grows.

Use modular monoliths where different services are in the same repo but are loosely coupled.

Thanks for reading!

Please comment your thoughts below!

Thanks!